Home Blog Page 53

All-Seeing Bliss: Full-Spectrum Drone Surveillance 

Drone invasion: fleet of remote controlled black drones flying in the sky. Rising popularity of civil drones is creating a new kind of sky traffic, with safety concerns. Composite image with digitally generated drone.

*Satire*

All-Seeing Bliss: Full-Spectrum Drone Surveillance 

By Thomas P. Hunterson, 

Chairman and CEO of Newcor Strategic Observations Group™️

In these uncertain times, when porch pirates roam free, raccoons behave with open impunity, and neighbours have the audacity to mind their own business there is only one logical solution: full-spectrum drone surveillance blanketing every inch of our beloved communities. Some naysayers may mutter words like “privacy,” “civil liberties,” or “I’d prefer not to be filmed showering,” but these concerns quickly dissolve when compared to the unparalleled glory of a sky buzzing with benevolent robotic observers.

Imagine stepping outside your front door and feeling the gentle whirl of rotor blades above; the modern equivalent of a guardian angel, only louder, shinier, and equipped with thermal imaging, and the comfort of constant aerial companionship. It’s incredibly reassuring to know that no matter where you go, a drone is hovering nearby, documenting your every move in case you ever want to relive the magic of your visit to the recycling centre.

For centuries, humanity has suffered from the oppressive burden of not knowing what everyone else is doing every second of the day. But fear not: with full-spectrum surveillance there is an end to all mystery, while gossip becomes obsolete. Why speculate about your neighbour’s romantic life, when you can view a 4K aerial replay? Why wonder which dog is off-leash and leaving unwanted “presents”, when you can call up a heat-signature track and file a detailed report? At last, the dream of total transparency, especially other people’s, can be fully realized.

Drones bring people together in ways previously believed impossible, boosting community engagement whether you want it or not. Suddenly, parent-teacher meetings are more lively when parents review flight logs to determine who exactly let their kid leave a bicycle in the ditch by the ferry. Bridge Parties are no longer plagued by awkward dancing and instead, residents enjoy spirited debates over whose backyard trampoline generated the most suspicious movements at 3 a.m. Nothing fosters togetherness like mutually assured visibility.

Gone are the dark ages where homeowners lived in blissful ignorance of their yard’s imperfections. Full spectrum surveillance harkens a new golden age for lawn care. With drones capturing every brown patch, weed, and slightly crooked garden gnome, citizens have been elevated to peak horticultural enlightenment. Neighbourhood standards rise, competitive edging becomes the sport of the summer, and front yards everywhere achieve an immaculate, surveillance-optimized sheen.

What better time than early childhood to teach kids this important life lesson, that privacy is a quaint relic from the past? Thanks to drones hovering lovingly over playgrounds, children adapt quickly to performing for an invisible aerial audience. They grow up confident, self-aware, and perfectly prepared for adulthood in which every job interview, commute, nap, and dental cleaning is monitored for quality assurance.

Sure, some critics claim that full-spectrum drone surveillance represents a “dystopian overreach,” or a “nightmare scenario,” or “literally the opening montage of every cautionary sci-fi film ever made.” But these cynics overlook the profound joy of living in a community where nothing escapes the warm, unblinking gaze of tireless mechanical helpers.

After all, what is freedom compared to the soothing certainty that someone, somewhere, somehow, is watching you at all times? Because if safety is good, then omnipresent aerial monitoring must be great. And in this brave new world of beautifully buzzing skies, we can all sleep soundly knowing that even our dreams might be recorded for an even brighter, buzzier, future review.

Shucking Oysters: Trumpettes

Shucking Oysters: Trumpettes

By Alex Allen

“Horse face.” “Fat.” “Ugly.” A “dog who has the face of a pig.” And “piggy.” These are just a few terms of endearment Trump has said to various women over the last year. Attacking women’s looks, mocking their bodily functions or comparing them to animals is his repertoire. Which is all rather odd, considering Trump has appointed more women to Cabinet-level positions than any other Republican president. The “new model of right-wing” womanhood – far-far right and blood thirsty. 

In 2012, Trump attacked Cher, over her criticism of Republican candidates, saying that she should “stop with the bad plastic surgery and nasty statements.” In the same year, Trump dismissed Bette Midler as “an extremely unattractive woman.” In a 2015 interview he said, “Heidi Klum. Sadly, she’s no longer a 10.” And yet, for a man who is so obsessed about looks, the women in his inner circle are not exactly Vogue material. All have identical plastic faces. Prolapsed lips, filler cheeks and foreheads, jaw contouring, coupled with heavy makeup, spray tans, fake eyelashes, thick eyebrows, and dark smoky eyes. It’s the Mar-a-Lago look. Which makes perfect sense considering the meaning of Mar is to ruin or diminish the perfection or wholeness of.

As Guardian writer Arwa Mahdawi wrote: “Among women the look is characterized by huge lips that look as if they could suck up a small child whole, frozen facial expressions, and cheeks so bulbous you could hide a gerbil underneath them. Men also have the slick frozen faces, but instead of bigger lips they’re pairing them with bigger jaws.” Also known as the “Republican look,” their clothes, whether casual or corporate, are always form-fitting and often accessorized with big gold Christian crosses. The women are always thin and almost always white.

Mahdawi adds that these are not human faces, they are “luxury meat-masks meant to signal wealth and in-group belonging.” AI-generated caricatures that live in such weird little bubbles that everyone is addicted to filler. No more hiding your secrets, it’s about flaunting them – a sort of conspicuous consumption of cosmetic surgery. 

DC plastic surgeon Anita Kulkarni has been turning down an influx of political insiders asking for “a more done look, like that Mar-a-Lago face.” And not because of a huge waiting list, but because adding extra fillers and injections on top of already treated faces, can be dangerous, she warned. It’s a situation Kulkarni calls “filler blindness.” If you add more and more product to your face and are surrounded by people who do the same, “you lose sight of anatomic normalcy.”

“It’s a mistake to dismiss this as just about fashion, just about makeup,” said Juliet Williams, a professor of gender studies at UCLA. “It’s actually absolutely central because this Trump MAGA movement was able to return to the White House in 2024, I believe, essentially because of leveraging the gender war.” Williams added: “I look at these MAGA women and I don’t see them as fashion victims…I see it as war paint.”

It’s about signalling your exclusive membership in Trump World. As Mahdawi wrote, when surgery is embraced for the purpose of political conformity, consciously or otherwise, the inner circle will just be “a steady stream of fembots, indistinguishable and dulled.” 

Achieving Mar-a-Lago Face isn’t easy. According to DC plastic surgeon, Dr. Jeffrey Lisiecki, the amount of work required depends on how much a person has aged and their natural features. To obtain the signature look, most people need a whole suite of procedures. And this is only the beginning. 

Achieving Mar-a-Lago Face isn’t cheap: $15,000USD for a brow lift, $30,000 for a face lift and neck lift, $12,500 for an eyelid lift, $20,000 for a nose job, and $10,000 for a fat transfer to the face. To complete the look, women will pay thousands more on Botox, fillers, neuromodulators, microneedling, facials, peels, laser treatments and medical-grade skin care products. 

And like a relationship, without regular maintenance, the Mar-a-Lago Face starts to disappear very quickly. Maintenance includes more Botox injections and laser treatments to maintain the skin’s buffed appearance. The bee-sting lips and puffy cheeks will require regular fill-ups and more surgery will be needed to tighten up the aging loose skin.

Dr. Faryan Jalalabadi, a Beverly Hills plastic surgeon, uses the term “frozen face,” which is caused by filler obstructing the muscles, resulting in less expression. Studies have found that the ice princess look leads to a lack of ability to connect. “When you look at them and you’re trying to have a heart-to-heart conversation, it’s hard not to get distracted,” Jalalabadi notes. “You have a hard time connecting with this person because they can’t move their face.” 

It’s no secret that when we get old our faces not only lose a bit of volume, they kind of sag and the only way to lift with volume is to overfill. And that’s where we see these overfilled high-cheek-boned, puffy-looking faces, “bordering on non-human looks, because what happens is people keep going back for little maintenance touch-ups.” Eventually, they can only get the surgeon who prefers money over cosmetics. The result? Jalalabadi warns they can “easily end up getting the Joker smile, where your lips are over-pulled horizontally, or windswept eyes because the skin wasn’t set in the proper direction.” 

One of the women most frequently cited as embodying the MAGA face is Homeland Security Secretary and ICE Princess, Kristi Noem. “The long-hair extensions, the big lips, the big cheeks, the makeup, the lash extensions, it’s like she’s doing drag,” said Daniel Belkin, a dermatologist in New York. Megyn Kelly called out Noem for “cosplaying” an ICE agent on a police raid while wearing “25 pounds of hair, only to be outdone by her 30 pounds of makeup and false eyelashes.” 

This is the real brutality of the Mar-a-Lago aesthetic. Like their boss, they have a vile streak all their own. Kaleigh Werner wrote in the Independent, “it’s not the makeup or potential plastic surgery, but the eagerness with which its adherents capitulate to the whims of their king. American politics, like our faces, may never recover.”

Saints in Cheap Rooms

 Gabriel Jeroschewitz, October 29th 2025, inspired and dedicated to Jean Genet

A tragically comic tone inspired by Jean Genet’s life and sensibility—but it is not a biography. It’s a fictionalized, imaginative tribute, blending history, invention, and irony.

Saints in Cheap Rooms

I met Jean one night in Paris, which no longer exists—though, of course, it never existed except in his imagination and the stains on the floorboards of Montmartre. By then, I was older than he ever intended to become; he, meanwhile, had slipped into legend and was bored by it. “It’s exhausting,” he told me, “to be admired by the right people. I always preferred being adored by the wrong ones.”

He looked disappointingly alive: blue veins under the wrist, nicotine patch on his arm, a slight heretic’s smile. The room was small, yellow, and smelled of vinegar and fear. “They call this a boutique hotel now,” he said. “Once it was a brothel. I can still hear the heels.”

I had been sent by a magazine that believed nostalgia could be monetized to write a piece titled The Last Saint of the Streets. My editor wanted tragedy, perhaps with a whiff of redemption. Jean preferred jokes. “Tragedy is just comedy with a good tailor,” he said, plucking at his shirt. “But you can’t afford either, can you?”

In the beginning, he told me, there was no mother, only paperwork. He was a child of the Republic, property of the state, and had a signature on a form that had lost ink. “They gave me foster parents who loved God more than food. So I stole food. Later, I stole God.”

He laughed—not kindly, but the way an acrobat laughs after surviving a fall. “You can tell a lot about a man by what he steals first.”

At twelve, he was caught taking apples. At thirteen, kisses. By sixteen, he had graduated to identities. He would try on names like other boys on jackets: Jean the Porter, Jean the Pickpocket, Jean the Poet. Only one fit properly, and it was the one he fashioned himself—the Genet who would bloom in the gutters.

“I enjoyed reform school,” he said, as if describing a spa. “Such an efficient place to meet your future readers.”

The files described him as incorrigible. He considered that a compliment, which, in the language of bureaucrats, it was not.

Years later, he began writing in another cell—not out of hope but spite. “You know how others keep diaries to confess?” he told me. “I kept mine to brag.”

He scrawled on brown paper, on the backs of arrest warrants, sometimes on the skin of lovers who slept too long. When the guards burned his first manuscript, he only smiled. “They were my first critics,” he said. “And like all critics, they improved the work by destroying it.”

He spoke of that period as one might talk of a monastic retreat. The other inmates thought he was drafting appeals; he was inventing saints. “All my saints were thieves,” he said. “Because they understood transubstantiation: turning sin into meaning.”

I asked whether he believed in God. “Of course,” he said. “How else could I rebel?”

Jean had a talent for making violence ornamental. He could describe a brawl as tenderly as others describe a wedding. “Prison was my first theatre,” he said, “and the wardens were generous producers. They even provided costumes—uniforms, chains, everything in matching grey.”

He adored men who were bad for him. “It’s not masochism,” he protested. “It’s aesthetics. Villains have better posture.”

Once, he fell in love with a murderer named Maurice, who wept only when shaving. Jean kept his tears in a bottle and later sold them as holy water to a painter from Montparnasse. “They were counterfeit tears, of course,” he said. But then, what isn’t?”

Their affair ended, like most of his affairs, in an arrest and an epitaph written in lipstick. Yet he remembered Maurice with laughter, describing how they used to gamble cigarettes over hymns. “He had such a voice for blasphemy. You could almost believe he meant it.”Fame arrived while he was still pretending not to want it. One morning, two gentlemen of letters appeared at his cell: Cocteau, wearing a silk scarf, and Sartre, wearing an opinion.

Cocteau called him a poet; Sartre called him a phenomenon. Jean called them “clients” and asked if they wanted receipts.

They campaigned for his release. The President signed a pardon. “They say I was freed by literature,” he told me, “but it was paperwork again. Always paperwork.”

Out of prison, he wandered Paris like a ghost who had overslept the apocalypse. Sartre invited him to salons, where people discussed existentialism and ate small sandwiches. Jean pocketed the sandwiches. “If you can’t live up to your reputation,” he said, “you might as well snack.”

Sartre later wrote a seven-hundred-page book about him. Jean never read it. “I already know the ending,” he claimed. “I remain misunderstood—but beautifully so.”In middle age, he grew political, though he insisted it was just another form of erotica. “I love the scent of danger,” he said. “It’s cheaper than perfume.”

He travelled to America and befriended the Black Panthers. “They greeted me as a comrade. I greeted them as a tourist of oppression.” He grinned to show he knew the irony. “At least they had better posture than the French revolutionaries—practice with rifles, you see.”

Later, he supported the Palestinians, scribbling essays that were half love letters, half manifestos. “The world thinks I choose sides,” he said. “But really, I just choose the beautiful losers.”

He claimed solidarity was the purest form of desire. “To march beside someone is to fall slightly in love with their stride.”

In this, he was consistent: the same hunger that made him steal wallets now made him steal injustices. Whatever belonged to others, he adopted—then returned, slightly more tragic and slightly more comic, as art. 

“Being respectable,” he informed me over cheap wine, “is a contagion spread by furniture.”

He refused armchairs and preferred the floor. “Chairs make one complacent, and complacency kills poetry faster than vice.”

Publishers begged him to tone down his work. “They wanted homosexuals who behaved like diplomats,” he said. “I gave them saints who behaved like thieves.”

When television producers proposed an interview, he demanded to appear in drag as the Virgin Mary. They declined. “Another missed miracle,” he sighed.

He liked to walk through respectable neighbourhoods to lower the property values by association. “Every culture needs its scarecrow,” he told me. “I volunteer.”

At this point, dear reader, I must confess my role. I had come to chronicle the legend, not to become part of it. Yet Jean, like quicksand, pulled everything into his orbit—pity, curiosity, even journalistic detachment.

He insisted I accompany him to a dinner thrown by admirers from the university. The evening dissolved into arguments about whether art should liberate or provoke. Jean said it should be embarrassing. “If a book doesn’t make you afraid to hand it to your mother, why bother?”

Midway through dessert, he pickpocketed the dean’s watch, then presented it as a gift to the waitress. “A redistribution of time,” he called it.

That incident cost me my column but gained me this story.

 

Old age suited him like rust suits iron—it gave him character while threatening to destroy him. He lived in hotel rooms that smelled of damp lace and burned coffee. “Each day,” he said, “I throw out one more illusion. Soon I shall be pure absence.”

He wrote slowly now, his sentences looping like prayer beads. Sometimes he forgot the plot but never the style. “Plot is for readers with errands,” he said. “Style is for those with faith.”

Visitors came hoping for wisdom. He gave them sarcasm; it lasted longer. To a student who asked how to live authentically, he replied, “Stop trying to look authentic. Die anonymous, and they’ll build you a museum.”

His laughter had shrunk to a cough. But when he laughed, the walls still vibrated, as if amused by his persistence.

One winter morning, he decided to die in a hotel he couldn’t afford. “Death should always be an act of theft,” he said. “I’m stealing a few more hours.”

I found him half‑asleep, murmuring to the ceiling. “Tell the concierge,” he whispered, “not to change the sheets. They are holy relics now.”

He refused hospitals—too clean, too sincere. “If I must be purified,” he said, “let it be by dust.”

He asked me to fetch a mirror. “So I can watch myself disappear,” he explained. When I returned, he was already gone, leaving only the mirror fogged with what might have been breath—or irony.

The manager billed me for the room. “He always leaves someone the check,” she said.

The funeral was sparsely attended: a handful of literary critics, two ex-lovers, and one confused tourist who thought it was a performance piece.

The priest hesitated over the eulogy, uncertain whether to emphasize repentance or rebellion. Ultimately, he settled for silence, which Jean would have considered an excellent review.

Afterward, at the café, we debated his legacy. Some called him a prophet of liberation; others, a pervert with a pen. I said he was a comedian who never told the same joke twice.

A critic shook his head. “There’s nothing funny about Genet.”

“Exactly,” I said. “That’s why he’s hilarious.”Years later, I still see him—in the corner of every bar, mocking the respectable ghosts who pretend not to notice him.

Sometimes he stands behind me in the mirror, fixing my tie. “You’re growing tidy,” he warns. “Careful—that’s the first symptom.”

I tell him the world has changed, that his kind of scandal is now mainstream, that nobody goes to prison for love anymore. He smiles. “Then go for something larger. There’s always another crime.”

He was never a hero, and he would have resented being one. Heroes end their stories; clowns keep performing under collapsing tents.

If tragedy is merely comedy that remembers its mortality, then Jean achieved both: he laughed himself into sainthood and sinned himself into laughter.

Coda

I keep his stolen watch on my desk. It runs backward, of course.

Sometimes I wind it, and the seconds tick in reverse—each moment returning to an earlier disgrace, each disgrace glowing a little brighter for being remembered.

I think that was his real miracle: not turning pain into art, but convincing us that pain was already art, if only we looked at it with the right amount of wickedness.

So here’s to the thief who stole redemption and pawned it for a story. Here’s to the saint of cheap rooms, who taught us that even degradation can have good comic timing.

And when my clock finally stops, I hope Jean applauds—from whatever infernal cabaret he haunts—before stealing it outright

Letter to the Editor – Stephen Hawkins

Denman Island High-Speed Internet: Time for Clarity, Transparency, and Accountability

by Stephen Hawkins

For more than four years, Denman Islanders have been told that high-speed fibre-optic internet is coming. In that time, millions of dollars in public funding have been committed, yet residents continue to face unclear timelines, shifting explanations, and limited transparency from CityWest

—the company contracted to bring world-class connectivity to our island.

It’s important to understand just how much public money is at stake. The current build-out is not a new initiative; it is a continuation of the earlier $5.6-million publicly funded project, which also included approximately $760,000 from the CVRD. That first phase was intended to complete the job—and didn’t. When it became clear that the project had come up short, it was Denman residents—who asked questions, pushed for answers, and drew attention to the unfinished work.

These community efforts helped bring about the most recent round of provincial funding, delivered through the Northern Development Initiative Trust on behalf of the Ministry of Citizens’ Services. That additional funding is now supporting CityWest’s renewed effort to finish the network.

Over the past year, I have been working alongside several other Denman residents to press for clarity. Together, we have approached elected officials, asked detailed questions, and sought reliable public updates. We have been grateful for the responsiveness of Director Daniel Arbour and the Ministry of Citizens’ Services, who have provided helpful information when able.

CityWest, however, continues to provide incomplete, vague, or evasive responses to key questions—questions about service coverage, outstanding gaps, completion timelines, and what still needs funding. If residents are to have confidence in the process, that must change.

Denman Islanders cannot advocate for what we don’t fully understand. And when millions in public dollars are being spent—our dollars—we deserve clear communication from the company delivering the service and from the public bodies funding it.

We need timely, accessible, public updates, ideally through community forums such as DIRA, so that all Islanders—not just a handful of people persistent enough to chase answers—can understand where things stand. Transparent information will make us better advocates for the final rounds of funding required to ensure every Denman Island household is served.

We all want this project to succeed. Fibre-optic connectivity is essential for modern work, education, health care, and economic security on Denman. But success requires openness. It requires accountability. And it requires the public to be treated as partners—not as an afterthought.

About the Author

Stephen Hawkins is a former media worker and current freelance video producer. A relatively new Denman Island resident, he has longstanding family ties to the island and has spent decades involved in labour and community advocacy.

Nobody’s Coming To Humanity’s Rescue; We’ve Got To Save Ourselves

Nobody’s Coming To Humanity’s Rescue; We’ve Got To Save Ourselves

Listen to a reading of this article (reading by Tim Foley):

AI isn’t going to save us. Tech innovation isn’t going to save us. Your favorite politician isn’t going to save us. The Epstein files aren’t going to save us. China isn’t going to save us. The aliens aren’t going to save us.

No one is coming to save us. There is no deus ex machina resolution to the plotline of the human story.

We’re going to have to save ourselves.

In ancient Greek theater they used to resolve plays by having gods come in at the end to punish the villains and reward the heroes. The actors playing the gods would either be lowered onto the stage by a crane or raised by machine from a trap door below, hence the term deus ex machina. Today it’s used to refer to any lazy plot resolution where the protagonists are rescued out of the blue by an external force rather than by the fruit of their own struggles and character development; if the gods just come in to save them at the end, then nothing they did up until that point mattered, leaving the audience dissatisfied and staring at the writer instead of at the story.

When you look at the existential crises facing humanity today, it’s tempting to find hope in some belief about external forces coming to our rescue without our having to struggle and change ourselves. You see such salvation stories everywhere:

  • Elon Musk is going to automate everything so we don’t have to work and then help humanity become an interplanetary species.
  • Artificial superintelligence is right around the corner and it will explode our scientific understanding of the universe and give birth to transformational new technologies.
  • The release of the Epstein files will expose all the corruption that’s been poisoning our society and lead to the arrest and disempowerment of all the evil bad guys.
  • Electing progressive Democrats or populist Republicans can put heroes into office who will transform the American political system for us.
  • The rise of China is going to reshape the world order and help bring about the end of capitalism.
  • UFO disclosure is happening any minute now and it’s going to bring in alien technologies that will save humanity from destruction.

And it never happens. The Greek god never makes his entrance. The actors are left standing there in a long, awkward silence while the set collapses around them.

It’s never gonna happen, folks. Apollo missed his entrance and Zeus is a no-show.

Nobody’s going to save us but us. We’re going to have to change. We’re going to have to act. We’ll keep hurtling in the direction of tyrannical dystopia, environmental catastrophe and nuclear armageddon until we do.

We’re going to have to help each other snap out of the hypnotic trance of propaganda and awaken to the truth of what’s really going on in our world, and show each other that real change is both necessary and possible.

We’re going to have to wake up enough that we can use the power of our numbers to force our rulers to stop stealing from us, oppressing us, killing our biosphere and murdering people.

We’re going to have to awaken from the trance of ego and become a truly conscious species, so that we can build a healthy world without falling back in to our self-destructive patterning when the revolution is over.

Everyone wants change, but no one wants to change. That’s why the deus ex machina plot resolution is preferable in our minds.

It’s just a fantasy, though. Change is coming from nowhere but ourselves. Maintaining hope in the fantasy is the first obstacle preventing us from waking up to reality.

Every species eventually hits a juncture where it must either make adaptations to changing conditions or go extinct. We are at that juncture today. We’ll either pass that test or we won’t, and if we pass it, it will be because of our own efforts, sacrifices, and self-transformations.

Nobody’s going to do it for us.

_____________

Caitlin’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece here are some options where you can toss some money into my tip jar if you want to. The best way to make sure you see everything I write is to get on my free mailing list. Click here for links for my social media, books, merch, and audio/video versions of each article. All my work is free to bootleg and use in any way, shape or form; republish it, translate it, use it on merchandise; whatever you want. All works co-authored with my husband Tim Foley.

Bitcoin donations: 1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Feature image via Adobe Stock.

Angled – 11/27/2025

sooo sad

#1711

CityWest Provides an Update to Denman Island Expansion Project

 

CityWest Provides an Update to Denman Island Expansion Project

DENMAN ISLAND – Earlier this year, CityWest announced that more homes and businesses on Denman Island would receive fibre-optic services after a $2.1 million increase to the project’s budget. The investment represents an additional 238 homes to be added to the scope of the project, representing 95% of occupied properties on Denman Island.

We’re excited to announce that construction has started on Denman Island, with work on Owl Crescent and Pickles Street currently underway! 

The project represents multiple additions to our existing infrastructure on Denman Island. Because services are already available to most of Denman Island, CityWest will be able to bring new sections online in stages as we build out the rest of our network. 

CityWest is encouraging all residents that would like to receive project updates to fill out the contact form at www.citywest.ca/dropping-in or call us at 1-800-442-8664. A representative from CityWest will contact homeowners and businesses as services become available in their neighbourhood.

A small portion of homes were unfortunately not included in the project’s increased scope due to the complexity of bringing services to some of the more remote areas and properties on the island. We have sent a representative to inspect each property from this list and are currently finalizing our field assessment from earlier this year. We have identified a number of addresses that will now be able to be serviced with fibre-optics. Homeowners in these areas will receive a letter in the coming weeks with an update on the connectivity status of their properties.

Fibre-optic services are being delivered on Denman Island through a partnership with the Comox Valley Regional District. The initial project, which covers both Denman and Hornby Islands was strongly supported at the local level, with 94% of residents between the two islands voting in favour of the last-mile build. The partnership will see a portion of the profits from Internet, security, TV, and phone services go directly back into the Comox Valley Regional District for grants and other forms of assistance that benefit residents and community organizations.

Today, hundreds of Denman Island homes are benefiting from improved connectivity through CityWest fibre-optic services. This expansion of the current project will ensure that even more homes and businesses have access to the best technology available.