Home Blog Page 9

I’M ON HOLIDAY

I’M ON HOLIDAY

  By Anon Singer, Hornby Island

Chorus (sing between verses):

   I’m on HOL- I- DAY, I’ve left my brains behind

   I’m on HOL- I- DAY, I’m sure that you won’t mind

1 Waiting at the ferry dock, I’ll blast out my loudest rock 

   I will drive at eighty K past the playground on my way

2 I brought a lot of booze, I’ll drink anywhere I choose

   And I’ll dump the cans and glass in some bushes as I pass

3 My cigarette butts, too, I’ll just toss them when I’m through

   When I use your porta-pot, I’ll shove my garbage down the slot

4 I will let my dogs run wild, and never supervise my child

   We’ve got bikes, so we’ll go ride, three or four, all side by side

5 Some dumb sign says “Shellfish Lease” where I pick oysters on the beach              

   Yeah, I heard that fires are banned, but mine’s a beach fire, in the sand

   I’m on HOL- I- DAY, I’ve left my brains behind

   I’m on HOL- I- DAY, don’t you love me and my kind?

outhouse mites

#1742

3Ravens Housing Cooperative  

MNS G1 IN10 N1 O2.00 Y0.00 C0.00 YT0 CT0 s0 sY0.00 S0 C0 FM0 FC000000000

3Ravens Housing Cooperative  By Keith Porteous (Op-Ed)

Anyone paying attention knows that there is a housing crisis of accessibility and affordability, but the word crisis” is now so commonly used its lost much of its impact and the sense of urgency in its true meaning. A crisis is defined as an unstable or highly difficult situation that requires immediate decisive action to resolve. It can also be a critical turning point where the outcome will make a positive and decisive difference.

Such is the current situation on Denman Island where we need urgent and decisive action by Local Island Trustees, proponents of innovative housing projects, and the broader community at large. Non-market based housing solutions need to be supported by the Local Trust Committee, and the 3Ravens Affordable Housing Cooperative is currently the best example deserving of our collective support.

One of the ways that the LTC has helped clear the bureaucratic hurdles for 3Ravens is by letting the Province of B.C.s regulatory agencies deal with the issues of water, where the LTC is without direct legal jurisdiction in regulating the health and safety of potable water. The 3Ravens Housing Coop cannot proceed without Provincial approval of their plans for water. The LTC should finish their work on housing policy reform prior to the end of their elected term.

Critics of 3Ravens who have written to the Local Trust Committee have made wrong assumptions about the affordability aspect of the proposal. 3Ravens is not a project that addresses every kind of housing need, nor does it address the need for non-market rental housing. Instead, 3Ravens Housing Cooperative creates an opportunity for people and families who have some independent means, but are priced out of the inflated housing market.

This type of non-market housing is crucial in retaining a healthy demographic mix of people who have likely been renters, but are interested in a community project that is reliant on the mutual efforts and benefits of a dozen neighbours who wish to work collectively for a secure home to live and thrive as friends and family. This is a legacy project already contemplated in the current Denman Island Official Community Plan.

While a worthy non-market rental housing project like Denman Green is best located near the amenities of Downtown Denman, 3Ravens will provide secure homes for people less dependent on their proximity to these services, in a similar way that the CoHo Landing project does not require their residents to live walking distance from services, because its residents have independent means of transportation. 

The additional 7 proposed 3Ravens residences will be no more than 1200 sq. ft., with a small common house, built on a 15 acre parcel. A few neighbours have expressed a fear of loss of privacy, but this seems more like the concern of entitlement carried by people living in extremely expensive and privileged circumstances. The closest neighbour building will be 250 ft from 3Ravens with plenty of trees buffering in between. We’re living in a housing crisis, and our neighbours need our support.

The Denman residents who are currently renters, and successfully aspire to be a part of the 3Ravens Coop, will also open up needed affordable rental vacancies for others. Let’s wish the very best of luck to Sara and Paul, in their generous efforts to bring forward such a worthy gift to Denman Islanders. 

2026 JRSP Artist-Scholar Residency Announced:

2026 JRSP Artist-Scholar Residency Announced:

Aaron Richmond: Meeting the Park through Relays of Attention

The University of Victoria (UVic), in partnership with the Jeffrey Rubinoff Sculpture Park (JRSP), is pleased to announce that Montréal based artist, scholar and curator Aaron Richmond has been selected as the 2026 recipient of the prestigious UVic x JRSP Artist-Scholar Residency.]

Aaron Richmond

Richmond’s practice situates in the intersection of visual art, architecture and performance studies. He holds a PhD in Architectural History and Theory from McGill University and is currently an affiliated Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Fine Arts at Concordia University. Following his residency at the JRSP, Richmond will be the Leonard A. Lauder Fellow in Modern Art at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York.

“At the Rubinoff Sculpture Park, I hope to engage the park’s sculptural environment as a living archive, while also treating it as a prompt for the continued exploration of material practices, ideas, and gestures. While in residence, I will develop a body of work that moves, like a relay, from landscape-architectural drawings to the creation of lightweight temporary sculptures, which will in turn function as the setting (or scenography) for performative readings of texts drawn from the learning centre and archives.”

With this work, Richmond hopes to provoke a broader set of questions: about art’s continued relevance as a space for experimentation; about its dynamic interplay between graphic, formal, textual and performative modes of attention; and about the kinds of fleeting scenography suited to this moment of social and environmental uncertainty.

See his work at www.aaron-richmond.com and attend his free open studio event at 12pm on July 16th at the Jeffrey Rubinoff Sculpture Park. “For the open-studio event, I will share my working process while guiding visitors through an attentional walk: an embodied on-site demonstration of the relays, prompts, and curiosities that animate it.”

Richmond was among the 56 distinguished international artists and scholars who applied for this year’s residency. Following his three week stay on Hornby Island this July, he will return to Victoria in November to present his works, offer student engagement at UVic, and host a public talk during the week of November 17, 2026.

Keep an eye out for updates on the residency and event dates at www.jrsp.uvic.ca, @uvic_rubinoff and https://finearts.uvic.ca/research/ and @uvicarts.

Courtenay-Alberni MP pushes Ottawa for national ship recycling strategy

Courtenay-Alberni MP pushes Ottawa for national ship recycling strategy

from AllthingsUnionBay.com

A Vancouver Island MP is calling on Ottawa to build a plan when it comes to breaking apart vessels that are derelict or at the end of their use.

Courtenay-Alberni MP Gord Johns made his comments June 11 during Question Period, saying while the federal governments shipbuilding strategy focuses on how to build and maintain vessels, it has no plan when it comes to responsibily retiring” them.

Thats a missed economic opportunity and a serious environmental risk for coastal communities,” Johns said in a statement released Monday.Johns said more than 900 derelict and end-of-life vessels are currently sitting off the coast of B.C., posing environmental risks while many aging federal vessels are also nearing retirement.

The MP asked whether the federal government would invest in dry dock infrastructure, ship recycling facilities and regulations that would make vessel retirement a formal component of the National Shipbuilding Strategy.

In response, Transport Minister Steven MacKinnon acknowledged ship recycling is a multi-billion-dollar global industry and said it presents an opportunity for Canada. 

MacKinnon also referenced derelict vessels across the country, including many owned by the federal government, and specifically highlighted interest in developing the sector in Port Alberni.

Johns welcomed the acknowledgement but said recognition alone is not enough.

Coastal communities need investment, enforceable regulations and a clear federal plan to build a safe, environmentally responsible ship recycling industry in Canada,” he said.Port Alberni has emerged as a potential location for a future ship recycling industry on Canadas West Coast.

Last year, local leaders, First Nations, industry representatives and government officials formed a ship recycling leadership group to explore opportunities for a made-in-B.C. solution.

There are currently only two commercial ship recycling facilities operating in Canada, both located on the East Coast.

The discussion has gained urgency following concerns over ship-breaking operations in Union Bay.

In 2025, the provincial government cancelled the Crown land lease held by Deep Water Recovery, citing environmental compliance and stewardship concerns, following complaints about pollution in Baynes Sound.

Johns said any future industry in Port Alberni would need to be developed differently. This has to be done the right way,” he said. That means full partnership with First Nations, respect for rights and title, strong community support, good local jobs and the highest environmental standards.”

Johns is also calling for federal regulations similar to those used in Europe, where ship recycling operations are governed by strict environmental, health and worker-safety standards.

Johns said he will continue pressing the federal government to invest in infrastructure and establish a national framework for vessel retirement as part of Canadas long-term marine strategy.

Canadas shipbuilding capacity recently came to the forefront after BC Ferries announced it had not received any local builds for its four new ferries, prompting the company to choose a Chinese shipyard.

Shucking Oysters: Free-Floating Fiefdoms

Shucking Oysters: Free-Floating Fiefdoms

By Alex Allen

What is with us humans that we can not just leave some things well enough alone? Why can’t we, as Nova Scotian’s say, just “leave ‘er be where Jesus flang ‘er”? We always have to DO something. Fix it. Hack it. Reboot it. Develop it. Scale it. Automate it. Conquer it. As if doing less, or even doing nothing, were not an option. Every inch of the Earth if it’s not abused it is eventually monetized. The rinse and repeat mantra of the capitalist world. As Douglas Rushkoff noted in his book, Survival of the Richest, “this is not creative destruction, but destructive destruction – all justified as the inevitable tide of forward progress.” 

We have Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk flirting with space colonies, inhabiting Mars, and floating data centres, all in the name of what? Progress? Innovation? Transformation? Winning? As Rushkoff wrote these are merely euphemisms for conquest, colonization, domination and extraction. Like the colonialists of the day, the elite entrepreneurs of the world are competing for and hoarding every inch, with no oversight at all. “They can break the law of physics, economics, and morality to offer them something even better than a way of saving the world: a means of escape from the apocalypse of their own making.” 

And it’s not just the usual’s. One company, Lonestar Data Holdings, wants to repurpose the moon “as a kind of off-world backup for Earth’s data.” Another company, Intuitive Machines, will be the mining the moon for iron and titanium. A third, D-Orbit, are looking at redacting old satellites and recycling parts for profit.

So now we have “seasteading,” a movement to establish permanent residences at sea, free from the pesky jurisdictions of any nation. Taking its name from “homesteading,” which describes the wild west approach to settlement in the US, seasteaders couch their economic interests in terms of innovation and freedom. As critic China Mieville explained, “Above all, they recast their most banal avarice – the disinclination to pay tax – as a principled blow for political freedom. Not content with existing offshore tax shelters, multimillionaires and property developers have aspired to build their own.” 

In 2008, Patri Friedman (the poker-playing grandson of economist Milton Friedman) launched The Seasteading Institute (TSI), with funding from Peter Thiel, co-founder of PayPal and pay pal to Vance and Trump. Seasteading, like politics, is a technology of world building. As the journalist Oliver Wainwright argued, “Seasteading represents the ultimate Silicon Valley approach to governance.” The success of the libertarian seasteading “relies on state power being simultaneously eluded and exerted.” When it launched, TSI’s mission statement was, “to establish permanent, autonomous ocean communities to enable experimentation and innovation with diverse social, political, and legal systems.”

Not long after they received funding from Thiel in 2017, TSI approached French Polynesia with an idea: Could they build a few miles off the shores of their islands? French Polynesia’s government drew up a seven-year agreement and both hoped to get work underway. Unfortunately things began to get heated. The engineering side went well. The ideological side did not. Marc Collins Chen, CTO of Oceanix, realized that “what they seemed to be imagining was a kind of floating island for tech billionaires who wanted to live a low-rules and -regulations kind of life, while also using the resources – like tech resources and things – from French Polynesia.” 

In Tahiti with no surprise, locals organized mass protests against “techno-colonialism” and blatantly using their fishing grounds as a food source for a floating island of billionaires. The agreement was eventually discontinued by the French Polynesian government. Do I hear echoes of Albania over the $1.4 billion Ivanka vanity project on Sazan Island? 

UofT environmental scientist and professor of sustainability Peter Newman, one of the most outspoken critics of seasteading, once called it “apartheid of the worst kind.” In an interview he bluntly shared his views: “Whether it is privatized urbanism or techno-libertarian escape, the idea is pretty stupid. It’s a rich people’s diversion and has no obvious value.”

“The most positive way to look at seasteading is that it has a pioneering mentality which is seeking to go where no humans have dared to go,” Newman added, “like going to the Moon or Mars. Many aspects of human life have been improved by daring pioneers.”

Collins Chen is working on a floating city off the shores of Busan in South Korea which will be starting construction in 2026. Oceanix, partially funded by the UN, focuses on climate change and less on creating a libertarian paradise, describes itself as “new land for coastal cities looking for sustainable ways to expand onto the ocean, while adapting to sea level rise.” The interconnected neighbourhoods will accommodate a community of 12,000 people, with each neighbourhood designed to serve a specific purpose: living, research, and lodging. 

As interest in seasteading resurfaces, Collins Chen’s Oceanix experiment seems more encouraging as a sustainable blueprint. But as Holly Baxter warned in The Independent: “in the background, the fever dream of techno-libertarianism, where wealth replaces governance and fantasy stands in for infrastructure simmers on. Its promise of freedom is seductive, but its avoidance of accountability is perilous.” Baxter wrote that ultimately, it may say more about the psychology of a handful of very rich men than it does about the future of humanity.

Smart city infrastructures and space colonies are pitched not only as consumer-friendly, high-tech, and sustainable solutions for human survival, but also as “promises of a certain aesthetic futurism.” In all cases, a “glossy, sometimes spectacular design product or event is aimed to comfort and encourage us to hand the keys over what remains of our futures to the extinction designer, hoping that the world they promise actually has a place for us.”

In Silicon Valley, extinction is not a threat to living worlds, but a design opportunity – a bug to be fixed. For Thiel, Musk and Bezos, among others, extinction is their market. What matters is not what is left for the many, but what services and bling are anointed to the chosen few on their exclusive floating cities and space colonies. As Jonas Staal eloquently wrote, “like the American Dream, the Extinction Dream exists only for the elite’s elite.”

The Unceded Territory of Dreams 

Unquiet presences ... Dora Maar's Sans Titre (1934)

The Unceded Territory of Dreams 

By Cylon2036  We/Us

Before language learned to fence the horizon, sleep wandered barefoot across a realm with no edges. We acknowledge the unceded territory of dreams, where every forgotten ancestor arrives disguised as weather, where rivers remember names that mouths have misplaced, and where the moon signs no treaties because light cannot be owned.

In each dream we cross an invisible border without passports, carrying our unfinished selves like lanterns stitched from moth wings. We borrow impossible aquatic architectures that bloom into neatly folded flowers. We wake believing we have returned, though our shadows carry pollen from elsewhere.

To acknowledge this territory is not to claim belonging but to admit trespass with gratitude. The dream refuses deeds, maps, and monuments. It offers only temporary shelter beneath the vast republic of the unconscious, reminding us that the imagination has outlived every empire, and that which is most shared is what no one can possess.

Image Credit: Unquiet presences … Dora Maar’s Sans Titre (1934)

The Beach at the Edge of Everything

 

Gabriel Jeroschewitz, April 29th, 2026, translated from Aramaic into English

The Beach at the Edge of Everything

The tide was going out when I saw them – two figures sitting on the beach. One had a beard like seaweed; the other wore a mustache like a relic from a dead regime. I was looking for solitude, but instead found Nietzsche and, beside him, Jesus of Nazareth.

“You keep talking about how God is dead,” Jesus said, picking up a shell with his fingers. “But you never offer an answer as to what comes after.”

“What comes after is the Übermensch. That’s the whole bloody point of creating beings that do not need permission from some almighty deity to live their lives.” Nietzsche crossed his arms over his chest. “When the old priest dies, the new man can come into the world and live.”

“What you said,” Jesus said, setting the shell on the sand, “is true. But what you felt when you wrote about the death of God was in Turin, alone, watching your horse get beaten up. You weren’t eating well, and no one spoke to you kindly in months. The man who wrote about the death of God was falling apart.”

“I know you feel pity for me, Jesus,” Nietzsche said. “But the angels came to me.”

“They did?”

“They came to me, in my house in Turin. When I was alone in the dark and crying over all the pain in my life. When I was weakest, they came to me. All of them. Nude, of course. They lay beside me on my bed and spoke to me in languages that told me I was chosen and that the universe loved me.”

Jesus remained silent for a while.

“And did you believe them?”

“What other choice did I have?” Nietzsche laughed. “My mother wrote letters to me that I could not bring myself to read. My sister hated humanity and all it did to the world. I had enemies from every university who spoke poorly of me in every journal. I was alone in my life. To survive, I accepted the comfort from the angels.”

“You are the dancing star,” Jesus said with a smile. “The one who creates meaning in a chaotic world.”

“But I didn’t do it for meaning,” Nietzsche said softly. “I did it to survive. To convince myself that a world without meaning was not winning over humanity.”

Jesus looked at him with sorrow in his eyes.

“Why are you here doing this to me?”

“Because I read your work. Because I know what it is to have your words misunderstood. You said the world needed to be free of God. It became an excuse for cruelty. Your Übermensch became monsters. You died before you could stop it.”

Nietzsche looked at Jesus with his blue eyes. “I died in 1900. For over a century, I have been dead. What does it matter what the world did with my words?”

“It matters because you’re still here.”

“I am?”

“You’re still sitting here on this beach, arguing about meaning in a chaotic world. I know what you did was beautiful, but the greatest terror of man is realizing that most cannot create meaning for their lives. Most need to feel loved and seen by someone greater than themselves.”

“And what did you do instead of offering comfort as I did?”

I placed the wine bottle on the sand and approached the pair.

“Jesus said you had a problem with loneliness, despite your great gifts to the world.”

“So I did.”

“You created stories to explain your pain. Your longing to be connected to something greater than yourself.”

“Which is?”

“That one is the loneliest number,” Jesus said, staring off into the distance. “That no matter what you achieve in your lifetime, on the final night of your life, you will eat dinner alone.”

The dog howled somewhere on the beach.

“I loved them,” Nietzsche said of the angels. “Even though they were not real.”

“But they were to you?”

“To me, they were real enough to make my existence bearable. To make my loneliness not so terrible.”

“They are not unlike what I offered you.”

“They are not,” Jesus said. “You said the infinite loved you. I said we were alone in the universe.”

“Which is more comforting?”

“Both are terrifying,” Nietzsche said. “But you chose to lie about it.”

“Perhaps. Or perhaps I chose to hope about it.”

“The whole purpose of God being dead,” Jesus said with a small smile, “is that it doesn’t really change anything. People needed meaning from God, even before you spoke of it. They do now. But you gave people an altogether different word—instead of ‘God loves you,’ you said you must love yourself.” Instead of saying “God has a plan for your life,” you said you must make your own plan. It’s the same fear of being alone in the universe, Friedrich. The same need to not have to suffer in silence by existing in a universe devoid of meaning.”

“You gave them a reason to survive.”

“But you didn’t.”

“I did.”

“How?”

“I gave them meaning,” Jesus said. “You gave them a reason to believe in a higher being, but not one that cared for them.”

“So what happened to the angels?”

“They were never real.”

“I know.”

“But what happens to them?”

“They become the reason at three in the morning when you’re lying awake, trying to ignore the silence in your bedroom. You wake up thinking of all the victories you had in your lifetime, what incredible things you said in your lifetime, and how they all brought you nothing but a more comfortable chair in your lonely room. They become the costume for your loneliness.”

“That’s a terrible thing.”

“It is the only honest one,” Jesus said. “Despite what people say about your death and the Übermensch, I think you were brave to speak up about it. In fact, I think you were right about most of what you said. The world is in chaos. Meaning is something that humans must create for their lives. God died, or rather, the deity that humans once worshipped passed on. But you were also dying inside and hiding it from the world by speaking in prophecies and ultimatums. You were lonely men showing desperation for one who would understand their pain.”

Nietzsche said nothing. He just sat on the beach as the tide went out.

I finished my wine.

I almost went over to introduce myself to the man who spent his life arguing against the humanity of human connection.

But I did not.

The angels would not come tonight. Never had they come to anyone. Yet, Nietzsche remained on the beach, staring at the horizon, wondering if they would appear.

Sometimes, in the face of loneliness, the simplest of choices to remain on the beach with your thoughts and your pain is the most human of all.