Home Blog Page 34

A Few Anecdotes About Garbage

A FEW ANECDOTES ABOUT GARBAGE

By Rosa Telegus

Lunch was a catered buffet served in the boardroom of the Comox Valley Regional District office in Courtenay.  This was the time Lindsay chose to dump three large black plastic bags of garbage on the floor in front of us – us being the Regional Solid Waste Advisory Committee.  Lindsay is not a homeless gal.  She is a CVRD outreach person and was with stunning flair making a point.  She spent the next ten minutes while we chomped through roast potatoes and chicken and a Greek salad sorting the garbage that she and her crew had collected around Courtenay.  The bags contained mostly recyclables and compost, and not much actual garbage that should be buried in a landfill. 

Smell?  It’s those organics, coffee grounds, vegetable peelings, and trashed desserts that smell, the methane generators.  Or, let’s call them the climate changers.  However, luckily there were no disposable diapers in those bags that Lindsay brought in.  If there had been, the room would have emptied.

Back on Denman – a dutiful unknown Denmanite, or perhaps it was a visitor not knowing where to take it, recently dropped off a bag of garbage at the Recycling Centre – after hours.  Garbage, not recycling, containing a used disposable diaper.  Horrible for our Recycling Centre workers.  But: diapers – a favourite food of bears!  Bear candy!  I have seen bits of diapers, cleaned of their contents, hanging off trees around dumps.  Us Ministry of Environment inspectors could recognize the smell for miles away.  

“Bear,” we’d say as we drove in.

Watching Lindsay go through those bags of garbage reminded me of my days at MOE in Kamloops where, in addition to bears, illegal garbage dumping was a problem.  We would go through bags of garbage looking for what?  Not recyclables but envelopes or bills with names and addresses and phone numbers.  Amazingly, this always worked to lead us to who dumped the garbage.  

And now to Comox:   I have a ninety-nine year old friend, Ann, who continues to compost.

“Every morning I eat an orange,” she told me.  “Then I snip up the peel and put it around my peach tree.”  Her lovely peach tree is abundant with ripe fuzzy peaches in late summer.  “Enough to fill my freezer and last the whole year,” Ann continues.  “Perhaps the oil from the orange peel does the trick?” I reply.

I prefer to dwell on the glee I see on Ann’s face as she shows me the earth around her peach tree, bright orange with snipped peel.

“Yes, I get it,” I say, meaning her attitude, I guess, and her care and thought about where her orange peels go.  This could be the secret to a long life!

Denman Island Bulletin Board Declares Itself “Beacon of Kindness,” Immediately Erupts Into Civil War Over Lost Cat Post

Denman Island Bulletin Board Declares Itself Beacon of Kindness,” Immediately Erupts Into Civil War Over Lost Cat Post

By Staff Satirist, The Islands Grapevine

DENMAN ISLAND, BC — The Denman Island Bulletin Board Facebook page, long touted as the “heart of the community” and “a safe space for respectful discussion,” has once again demonstrated its unique talent for transforming mild inconvenience into full-blown moral warfare.

The group, which claims to “foster connection and share helpful local information,” was thrown into chaos Tuesday after a resident posted a photo of a cat “possibly lost or just really chill.” Within 14 minutes, the post had devolved into a 168-comment thread featuring accusations of “toxicity,” “censorship,” and at least three separate references to the Magna Carta.

“This group is about compassion and respect,” declared one admin in a post pinned above a 400-comment thread titled ‘Who Keeps Taking the Recycling Bins?’ “We welcome all voices — except the rude, the negative, and anyone who disagrees with me in even a nuanced way.”

Longtime residents say the page has become a vital community resource for finding plumbers, reporting ferry delays, and settling centuries-old philosophical questions through personal attacks.

“It’s incredible,” said local potter Fiona Drift, who was banned for asking where to buy tofu. “One minute you’re just trying to share that the Co-op has oat milk again, and the next, someone’s accusing you of corporate fascism.”

Observers note that the Bulletin Board’s moral compass swings wildly depending on who’s holding it. Self-described “gentle souls” have been seen publicly shaming neighbors for tone, font choice, and “energetic aggression,” while others rally around slogans like ‘Community, Compassion, and Consequences.

One moderator, speaking under the pseudonym PeacefulDolphin49, defended the group’s approach. “We don’t silence anyone,” she said. “We simply remove comments that make people uncomfortable, question authority, or use the word ‘however.’ That’s not censorship — that’s curating good vibes.”

A recent poll of islanders revealed that 92% read the Bulletin Board “religiously,” while 87% claim they “hate it but can’t look away.” Anthropologists have proposed the page be preserved as a digital heritage site documenting “peak small-town drama.”

Despite frequent declarations of “no more negativity,” the group shows no sign of slowing its descent into self-parody. Sources report that a new rule banning “passive-aggressive language” has already sparked heated debate over whether the phrase “Have a lovely day” qualifies as an attack.

In a recent update, moderators invited members to join a new spinoff page, Denman Island Bulletin Board: The Kindness Reboot, described as “a drama-free zone for community harmony.” Within hours, the group had splintered into three factions: True KindnessKindness Uncensored, and The Real Bulletin Board, You Sheep.

As one commenter succinctly put it: “This island doesn’t need a community page. It needs a group hug and maybe a mute button.”

Letter to the Editor – Melanie Ridgeback

(Satire/Fiction)

Dear Editor,

We demand changes to the Grapevine’s editorial policies. If you don’t follow our guiding principles (below), we’ll continue our advertising boycott that withholds all publicly tax funded local advertising from The Islands Grapevine..

GUIDING PRINCIPLES

1.As neuro-curious allies,The Islands Grapevine acknowledges our privilege before speaking in this safe, consent-based conversational space.

2.The Grapevine only sees sentient beings on diverse evolutionary timelines.

3.The Grapevine will assure our community newspaper is inclusive for all energy forms, including those who identify as ambient light.

4.The Grapevine will now refer to Halloween as ‘Intercultural Awareness and Post-Colonial Reflection Day.”

5.The Grapevine will no longer use big words — it’s a micro-aggression against pre-verbal consciousness.

The Grapevine will also adjust its language as a result of our newfound training in nonviolent communication. 

(eg. the tree didn’t fall — it self-lowered in resistance to the anthropocentric forestry-industrial complex.)

The Grapevine acknowledges that the bullying behaviour of a few hostile and privileged neighbours is as a result of them navigating late-stage capitalism.

Instead of being cancelled, The Grapevine will now describe it as a “community-driven accountability redistribution.”

Sincerely, and with extreme prejudice,

Melanie Ridgeback

You Believe The Mainstream Narrative? Of Course You Do, You’re Twelve

You Believe The Mainstream Narrative? Of Course You Do, You’re Twelve

Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix

 

Listen to a reading of this article (reading by Tim Foley):

The ultimate expression of “everyone is twelve now” theory is in the mainstream worldview promoted by western pundits and politicians which holds that the world is full of evil villains doing evil things simply because they are evil, and that these Bad Guys are opposed by the virtuous Good Guys of the US-led world order.

You think Hamas killed Israelis because they’re a bunch of monsters who hate Jews? Of course you do, you’re twelve.

You think Trump is trying to get rid of Maduro because Maduro is an evil dictator who wants to poison Americans with fentanyl? Hell yeah homie, you’re twelve.

You think Putin invaded Ukraine because he hates freedom and democracy and wants to conquer the world? Bless your heart my twelve year-old buddy.

You think the US and Israel have been attacking and eliminating rivals in Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen and Palestine in order to fight terrorism, stop tyranny, and protect the world from nuclear weapons? Yeah, that checks out, you’re twelve.

The mainstream western worldview is like a children’s cartoon, with the Bad Guys doing Bad Things simply because they are Bad, and the Good Guys striving heroically to stop them. It sounds like a shitty PG-13 summer blockbuster starring The Rock, but it’s the consensus worldview of serious professional pundits and analysts who share this perspective on mainstream platforms with serious expressions on their faces, and anyone who calls any part of it into question is dismissed as an extremist or a deranged crackpot.

Because everyone is twelve now.

I said the above on Twitter and I got a reply from a guy saying “Western countries like Denmark, Holland and the UK, US and Israel too are objectively nicer and happier places than the third world ones you mentioned. You can see by walking around, looking at people and things. So we’re doing something right that they’re doing wrong.”

It always fascinates me when people think this is some kind of checkmate argument. Yes obviously it’s nicer to be in the countries doing the bombing, sanctioning, extracting and stealing than the countries being bombed, sanctioned, exploited and robbed. It’s nicer to be a mugger than the person being mugged, too. It’s always more pleasant to be the hammer than the nail.

It’s such a self-evidently stupid argument, but you see it all the time. Whenever I talk about the abusiveness of the western empire I always get empire simps in my replies all “hoho, but have you considered that it is nicer to live here than to live there?” Of course it is, dickflop. It’s always going to be easier being the abuser than the abused.

Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir reportedly advocated shooting children who get too close to the “Yellow Line” dividing Israel-controlled parts of Gaza from the parts under Hamas control. After a while you start understanding why so many people refer to the Israeli regime as “demonic” and “satanic” even if you’re not religious. At a certain point you just run out of strong enough adjectives.

It’s so weird how the western political/media class regards Ben-Gvir as a fringe kook whose comments should be ignored despite the fact that he (A) is Israel’s national security minister and (B) consistently ends up getting what he wants.

Zohran Mamdani is outside my area of political interest and it’s none of my business who New Yorkers elect as their mayor, but the Islamophobic shrieking I’ve been seeing online in response to his campaign has been absolutely jaw-dropping. No one with mainstream political or media aspirations could ever get away with talking about the religion of a Jewish politician the way Zionists have been openly talking about Mamdani and his faith.

From what I can tell Mamdani is a just a regular guy and a fairly ordinary progressive Democrat with an extraordinarily high level of campaign talent, but these freaks are claiming he’s going to impose sharia law and start throwing gays off the Chrysler Building. It’s a degree of mass hysteria about Islam unlike anything I’ve seen since the immediate aftermath of 9/11, which any normal person will agree led to some extremely bad thinking and terrible decisions.

Some of it is arising from organic American racism and the knee-jerk rightist impulse to throw anyone to the left of Bill Clinton out of a flying helicopter, but a lot of it has nothing to do with Mamdani at all. As we’ve discussed previously, Zionists have been seizing on every opportunity to promote hatred of Muslims because it’s a lot easier than convincing people to like Israel.

To be clear, I am not speculating when I say this. Drop Site News published a reportlast month based on leaked documents which showed that the Israeli government had commissioned an American polling company to help it with the PR crisis caused by its genocidal atrocities, and the report found that the most effective strategy would be to foment fear of “Radical Islam” and “Jihadism”.

So this agenda is already in the waters of Zionist consciousness. The election of a Muslim to the most high-profile mayoral position in the United States provides Israel supporters with ample opportunity to stir up panic about Muslims in America on the assumption that Israel will benefit from such sentiments, since Israel is always killing Muslims. There is no argument to be made that Israel is a good nation that is inherently deserving of support, so they’re banking on circulating the belief that it’s good to drop bombs on Muslims instead.

Western politics is getting more and more diseased, and US politics is leading the way. It’s making people dumber, crazier, and more hateful, and is preventing them from seeing that the real minority that’s been causing everyone’s problems are the rich and powerful oligarchs and empire managers who rule the western power alliance. Keep ordinary members of the public hating each other and fighting each other, and they won’t start hating and fighting their actual oppressors.

_______________

Caitlin’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

The best way to make sure you see everything I write is to get on my free mailing list. My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece here are some options where you can toss some money into my tip jar if you want to. Click here for links for my social media, books, merch, and audio/video versions of each article. All my work is free to bootleg and use in any way, shape or form; republish it, translate it, use it on merchandise; whatever you want. All works co-authored with my husband Tim Foley.

Bitcoin donations: 1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Feature image via Adobe Stock.

lunkfast club

#1707

Shucking Oysters: How Nobel of You

Shucking Oysters: How Nobel of You

By Alex Allen

Nitroglycerine, dynamite, ballistite. These are just some of the more famous inventions of Alfred Nobel, who held 355 patents during his lifetime. Nobel pursued many successful business ventures with his family, but what he is best known today for is the veritable Nobel Prize foundation. 

Awarded annually, the prize categories are in: physics, chemistry, physiology or medicine, literature and peace. But few awards in the world command as much prestige or controversy as the Nobel Peace Prize. This prize is the most coveted of them all, particularly with world leaders. And no more so than with Donald Trump, who’s pursuit of the award borders on the obsessive. 

Trump’s entire worldview seems predicated on a notion that life is unfair, Dave Schilling wrote in The Guardian. The system is rigged and he alone can balance the scales back toward justice. “This all makes sense as a rhetorical strategy, and it has proved popular in an age in which most people deem the American government to be about as straight as a bowl of chicken noodle soup. But it doesn’t play so well when his grievances are focused almost exclusively on himself and his own personal gripes.” 

Maureen Dowd wrote in the New York Times that Trump’s “longing is partly inspired by his jealousy of Barack Obama, who absurdly got a Nobel Peace Prize after only eight months in office for just being a cool dude.” Expanding the US military’s domestic role and sending the National Guard to blue cities is basically declaring war on his own country. “Even if he says he should have won the Nobel five times over for his work solving foreign conflicts, he is creating conflicts in America, concocting perilous crises in American cities.” 

Trump’s “conception of peace is performative and transactional, driven by media spectacles, symbolic agreements, and coercive diplomacy,” wrote Ihsan Faruk Kılavuz. The rise of performative peace underscores the urgent need to distinguish image from substance. Trump may understand the Peace Prize better than most, however, “as an award that too often rewards power over principle.” 

The Nobel Peace Prize needs to return to its founding values: “recognizing those who pursue peace not as a political strategy but as a principled mission rooted in justice, nonviolence, and human dignity.” The first Peace Prize in 1901 was shared by Jean Henry Dunant of Switzerland and Frédéric Passy of France. Dunant was recognized “for his humanitarian efforts to help wounded soldiers and create international understanding” in founding the Red Cross and creating the Geneva Conventions. Passy was honoured “for his lifelong work for international peace conferences, diplomacy and arbitration.” 

Peace does not come from drone strikes, dramatic threats of war, or being a bully. It comes from “genuine reconciliation, human rights protection, and long-term social transformation.” US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth glibly said “those who long for peace must prepare for war.” From Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and everything that has happened in that war until now, we see what “peace through strength” looks like. And it’s not pretty.

Minoo Khaleghi wrote in the International that the Nobel Peace Prize selection criteria has become increasingly political and power-driven and the winners have more often “legitimized radical, politicized, and even militaristic actions than celebrated genuine and institutionalized peace.” 

There are countless examples of this contradiction between the award of peace and the actions of those who received the prize. When Henry Kissinger won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1973 the announcement provoked outrage. How can he win for helping end the Vietnam War he started? Two Nobel Committee members resigned in protest. North Vietnamese leader Le Duc Tho, who was jointly awarded the prize with Kissinger, refused to accept it, for obvious reasons. 

Barack Obama’s 2009 Nobel Peace award, after less than a year in office, was described as an “advance prize” granted for his “extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.” Yet Barack’s government led more military operations since Bush Junior, “proving that his peaceful rhetoric and real-world actions were profoundly at odds.” Even Obama himself admitted to confusion over the honour, stating years later that he was unsure why he received it. 

This year in October, the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to María Corina Machado, leader of the right-wing opposition party in Venezuela, who was praised “as one of the most extraordinary examples of civilian courage in Latin America in recent times.” Machado, in hiding, dedicated the award to the “suffering people of Venezuela” and to Donald Trump “for his decisive support of our cause.” 

Machado joins the US administration in calling Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro the leader of a “criminal narco-terrorism structure” and has asked Trump for more help in unseating Maduro from power. She even asked Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to help “liberate” Venezuela with bombs. What is concerning is the massive deployment of US military force in the region, with over 10,000 US troops and dozens of aircraft and ships. The administration claims it is a counter-drug and counter-terrorism mission, but US officials have privately made it clear that the intent is to drive Maduro from power. 

Faramarz Kouhpayeh wrote that Trump and Machado are “cut from the same right-wing authoritarian cloth,” which in part explains why Trump quickly congratulated her, and why Machado, in turn, dedicated her award to him. Khaleghi warned that in awarding the prize to Machado, the Nobel Committee has provided an open invitation for Trump to continue, and even “escalate, military intervention and gunboat diplomacy in Latin America.” 

As Kılavuz sadly wrote: “In a world where Mahatma Gandhi once stood as the emblem of peace and non-violent resistance, we have reached a point where international arsonists portray themselves as peace icons and hide their atrocities beneath the shadow of the Nobel Peace Prize.” 

Venezuelan activist Michelle Ellner said of María Corina Machado: “Anyone who knows what she stands for knows there’s nothing remotely peaceful about her politics.” The Nobel Peace Prize has a credibility problem; it needs to rise above the very forces it was created to challenge, otherwise it will continually be awarded to mediocre individuals whose chief qualities are greed, ego and a talent for manipulation.

Phoenix Riting! – October 23rd, 2025

I had a teacher in Grade 12 who told us, “Everything you will ever know, you already know now. Once people hit the age of nineteen, their minds start to rigidify, and after that, nothing more can change.”

I don’t know where he got that very wrong opinion from, but he stuck to it like glue. Now we understand things differently. Neuroplasticity is real. Brains change, heal, adapt, make new synaptic connections. The more we learn, the more we can learn.

Opinions are easy to hold onto. What’s trickier is to listen, to expand our point of view, to hear others, and to see if maybe our opinions can change or evolve. We can change and grow right up until the day we die.

If that’s true, what does it say about our cultural obsession with youth? To this day, if you’re not famous by thirty, the story goes, you’re probably never going to be. And if you can’t be famous, who even are you? You may as well put yourself out to pasture, take a seat on the “obsolete” pile with all the other never-weres and used-to-wannabes.

The 60s and 70s started the trend of youth worship, although back then, the thinkers and pundits were universally grey-haired white men. Not that that was better. Now we turn instead to toned yoga teachers with YouTube and Instagram accounts, and massive-thewed gym bros who host podcasts.

They’re called “influencers.” They influence people, but only if they’re young, fresh, dewy-eyed, and good to look at. Because they look good, shiny-toothed and glowing with health, it’s assumed that they must be smarter or wiser than average. But when you really listen, they have nothing real to say.

What madness is this? Everything feels backwards these days. Maybe we’re a bunch of Dorian Greys, old and weary-eyed as children, bearing the weight of the world; then, as elders, we grow lighthearted, humming, breathing deeply through our days, learning to look at life through the eyes of innocence. We learn to be present. But we do not influence the culture.

If you listen to today’s influencers, you’ll come away with the impression that what really matters in life is how good you look on screen. Image must be managed. Some edit their images with Facetune and Photoshop; others “looksmaxx” by hitting the gym or mastering contouring with makeup–men and women alike.

Scratch a little deeper and you’ll find that what really matters is how much money you make. The more money you have, the more you matter, and the more influence you can wield. If you don’t have money, it doesn’t matter what you’ve learned from your past mistakes or how wise you are. 

And yet time bestows upon us such wild and unique gifts: creativity, insight, poetic expression, our own angle of view.

The most interesting people, the ones with the most to say, say it right here, to my face, where no one else is around to listen. What a ridiculous blessing it is to be surrounded by wise, funny, experienced, self-educated, mature humans of all ages, and to have that wealth all to ourselves. No filming, no like button, just life happening right here. Just for us.

It’s not about age, youth versus elders. The people I value most have opted out of the cultural obsession with image and disposable income. I’m not othering anyone here; it’s not even about income or wealth. It’s about priorities. It’s about attitude. Do we really see and hear the people in front of us? Or are they filtered through a lens of status relative to our own?

If you live on Hornby, I suggest you necessarily pay more attention to who people are and less to how they seem. We simply don’t have the population to afford us the luxury of picking and choosing between classes of people. Each person here is a class of their own. What a privilege that is.

I am endlessly fascinated by the things people say, the wit and wisdom they drop so casually right there in the produce department, over a head of endive or a bell pepper. It makes me think. It makes me smile. It makes life excellent. Too bad there’s no “share” button.

Thats what I think. What do you think? Email me at phoenixonhornby@gmail.com for feedback and for more information about the Songwriter Circle that meets at 7 p.m. every Friday evening at the Hornby Arts Centre.

The Stones Remember

Gabriel Jeroschewitz, September 30th, 2025, dedicated to my high school teachers and our ancestors abridged

The Stones Remember

The past does not only whisper; it tolls like a bell that no hand rings, and on certain nights when the winds rise over the Borders, I can hear it still. Its sound is not in the ear alone but in the bones, a sorrow that rattles like thin reeds in winter water. They call such sensations memory, but let me tell you plainly—some memories belong not to us, but to the land itself. And when men are foolish enough to lean too close, the land sometimes comes awake.

In my boyhood, in those truant afternoons stolen from the blackboard and its chalk-dust tyrannies, I first tasted what I can only now call the dissolution of paper. I had taken some clerkly volume from the back shelf of the school library, a heap of dog-eared authorities no one read except out of punishment. Its subject was the high and far-off times, recounted in a dead tongue, blotted with pedantry. Yet the text began to breathe in the July field where I lay reading, sunlight freckling the grass. Letters blurred with heat, figures of Saxon axe-men and Norman butchers dissolved into streams and reformed as faces of the living earth—faces that looked back at me with neither kindness nor hostility, only recognition.

It was as if the air leaned close and whispered: You are not the first.

From that instant, a restlessness entered me. It has never left. All my life, I have wandered the winding ways of this island—its rivers, ruined churches, long barrows gnawed by sheep, half-forgotten forts perched on hills like broken teeth. And always, beneath the clamour of history with its trumpets and treaties, I have heard a deeper voice, lamenting.

The tale of Britain since the Flood is written in war, as every schoolchild knows. War that gouged the heart high, spilt jewels both red and white, and left brother to kill brother in salt seas brimming with tears. Caesars came with lawful butchers; Saxons with flame for thatch; Vikings with rune-cut axes; Normans with ropes and iron laws. Centuries later, priests jingled threats of Hell while gorging on roasted meat. I don’t need to belabour it. You know the litany. Blood, fire, famine, plague—a fame that soaked away and left only scars.

But what struck me in boyhood and still in grey age is that all this bloodshed was but an echo. The stone remembers older sorrows. Long before English or Scot and Babel cracked our tongues, some people stood among the standing stones and shaped them, not for war but for conversing with something we no longer name. They left no parchment, coin, or crown—only the granite, chalk, and earth patterns.

And this is where the horror begins.

For one August some years ago, I returned to the Borders, to that very place where Powsail Burn joins the Tweed. The riverbanks hummed with bees. A brown bull grazed in the far meadows—a seeming peace. I carried with me a notebook, intent on tracing again those patterns of stone and water that had haunted me for half a century.

But peace is a veil, thin as mist.

As dusk fell, I saw the salmon leap against the weir, flashing silver in the gloom. And in their arc, I thought I glimpsed the outline of a man—antlered, leaf-crowned, half-submerged. Call him Green Man, call him what you will. He vanished, but the river stirred as though it had drawn breath. And then the air pressed close again, whispering: You are not the first.

I confess I grew frightened. My hand shook so that my notes blurred. The evening bells from a village church tolled across the fields, dull and mournful, like the wound-horn of some forgotten battle. With each toll, visions pressed upon me—quick, bleeding visions.

I saw men of the first tribes, beehived and coracled, their skins daubed not with barbarous paint but with bright spirals, intricate as stars. They laughed, gossiped, stole, and feasted. They lived. But then—I saw them undone. Not by Saxon or Roman blade, for these people long predated such invaders. No, their undoing came by something older, a wave without an ebb, flooding the land from beneath.

It was not water. It was forgetting.

A plague of forgetting, thick as fog, rolling in silence. They lost their own names. They lost the words with which they had conversed with stone and river. Children stood beside their parents and did not know them. Lovers lie down together as strangers. All vision was maimed. All amethyst turned adamant. I heard their cries, and in the reeds I heard lamentation, like wind rushing through hollow bone.

The horror of it was not death. It was erasure.

And it spread. What are the endless wars of later age, if not the staggering of blind men who no longer remember themselves? Brothers are killing each other because both have forgotten they are brothers. History itself is an aftershock of this first forgetting.

By nightfall, I was near mad with dread. I stumbled from the river toward the old stone circle on the ridge. The moon rose behind it, pale and pitiless, outlining each stone like a black tooth against a silver sky. I dropped my notebook. The paper was already dissolving beneath my hand—the ink spilling away like water, as it had in childhood. Nothing written would hold.

And then I saw him.

Merlin, they call him, though the name is poor and ill-fitting. A shadow stood among the stones, a man with hair wild as roots, eyes drowned in centuries. He lifted his hand, and I knew it was not to bless but to warn. His lips moved soundlessly, yet I understood: The wound is still open. It bleeds in every age. It will never heal while men forget themselves.

I tried to speak, but my voice was lost to the tolling of some unseen bell. I ran, half-falling down the slope, branches scratching my face. Behind me, I heard the bees hum louder, a droning like the unceasing murmur of graves. I did not look back until I reached the bull in the meadow. Strange comfort, that creature—its breath rising in the cool night, steady, indifferent to men and their madness. Only then did I dare turn.

The circle was empty—stones and nothing more.

Yet I do not mistake. What I saw was true. The land does not lie.

Now, years later, I write this, though I know it will invite mockery. But mockery is a thin thing compared to silence. I must speak if only to bear witness, though my words dissolve even as I set them down. For what am I but nothingness set a-wandering, restless in life and seeking no peace in death, compelled to breathe the ages into the air lest they vanish utterly?

Do you understand?

The stones remain, from China to the Americas, India to Ireland. They are patterned, patient, and immutable. They are the last testimony of our unwritten forebears, those clean and cunning ones we slander as savages. Their presence hints in every human word, and though history lies, beauty endures—an impossible beauty reared by hands now nameless.

But it is fragile. Already, I feel it slipping again. I fear one day it will be gone entirely, and we will be left alone with only our wars, our roasted meat, our pedants prating of Hell. Alone in the garden, restless, unable to die.

And so I leave you this tale, if it endures on paper. Scan it before it fades. Listen—not with your ears, but with your bones. Do not fear the silence between words. For in that silence, the forgotten speak.

And if you find yourself upon some soft summer’s day by the Tweed or any river where stones stand long in field or wood, cup the water in your hands. Look within.

If the salmon leaps, the bees hum, the wind bends reeds into lamentation—know this: Memory is not merely yours. It also belongs to the land; one day, it may call you home.

But beware, for the land remembers not only beauty. It remembers forgetting. And that is a blessing from which no man returns whole..