Home Blog Page 16

Letter to the Editor – Doug Rennpferd

Dear Grapevine.

This is a response to Gabriel Jeroschewitz’ recent stories involving the historical figure Jesus as a kind of literary device.

I don’t know wha impression of Jesus other readers, if they are even many, make from this kind of writing.

But we are living at a time when, at the end of a long decline of Christian culture accompanied by all the disastrous effects the gospel predicted it would have; the greatest majority of us know little to nothing of Jesus, his historicity, his deeds and words, and his resurrection…

So adding to people’s scanty impressions of a man who claimed a unique central divinity to mankind and history, are someone’s words put in the mouth of Jesus – words he would never says they are in contradiction of what he said and did.

This to me, has the flavour of a vulture pecking at a corpse. But of course Christ is not that corpse. Because the resurrection of Jesus was well attested a the time I happened.

If I have a bone to pick, it is about the author making their Jesus and Nietzsche agree; because they really were diametrically opposed in their message. Nietzsche championed the glorification of one’s will, whereas Jesus said that he did nothing of his own accord, but only what his father would have him do. This is an important distinction in a world that has become sick with self-worship, a blueprint for society that big business and global institutions encourage.

I also wondered if the writer would show a similar lack of cowardice if they wrote about Mohammed to a Muslim audience.

But the central force of Christianity is a living sacrifice, a lamb that told his followers to forgive and even give their lives up to their antagonists.

That is a juicy carcass indeed…

Finally, to have Jesus say God is dead is the most perverse kind of misrepresentation. Jesus who said all power was given into the Son: who was transfigured on Mount Hermon; of whom when Thomas saw his resurrected Master, said, “my Lord and my God.” For more uninformed people, God is not dead nor is Jesus and they are the same person who loves us.

Sincerely, 

     Doug Rennpferd

Well, At Least Lindsey Graham Is Dead

Well, At Least Lindsey Graham Is Dead

Reading by Tim Foley:

The only positive thing about the Iran war heating up again is that Lindsey Graham won’t be around to enjoy it.

The bloodthirsty South Carolina senator breathed his last on Saturday, succumbing to what his office describes as “a brief and sudden illness” after a political career dedicated to promoting wars, airstrikes and proxy conflicts at every possible opportunity.

People have long poked fun at the hypocrisy of Lindsey Graham living as an obvious closeted gay man in a political party with a virulently anti-LGBTQ platform. I personally have always found Graham’s sexual attraction to men a lot less interesting than his sexual attraction to acts of mass military slaughter.

Ever since the death of Graham’s dear friend John McCain, nobody on Capitol Hill has been able to match his gleeful enthusiasm for the shredding of human bodies using high-priced war machinery. Wherever there was any debate about dropping bombs, launching missiles, toppling foreign governments, arming proxy forces, or imposing starvation sanctions, you could always count on Lindsey Graham to be the first and loudest voice arguing in favor of more death and destruction.

Graham has personally taken credit for persuading President Trump to begin the war with Iran. In the months leading up to his unexpected demise, the senator had advocated for direct US military interventionism in Iran, Cuba, Venezuela, Yemen, Nigeria, Lebanon, and Palestine, and had just returned from a trip to Kyiv promoting the US proxy war against Russia. He was literally pushing for more war and military expansionism until the very end of his life.

All the world’s worst people are publicly expressing their grief about the loss of their beloved war slut, from Trump to Benjamin Netanyahu to Itamar Ben-Gvir to Tom Cotton to Mike Huckabee. Meanwhile, everyone who’s not a warmongering psychopath is having a splendid day.

Of course we’re seeing imperial narrative managers like Piers Morgan wagging their fingers and chiding their audiences not to speak ill of the dead, but the hell with them. We’re not doing that. Politeness is not more important than Lindsey Graham’s victims. The liberal desire for propriety and nice feelings does not outweigh the importance of naming and shaming Graham’s frenetic scramble to murder as many human beings as he possibly could throughout his evil, miserable life.

Lindsey Graham is dead, and it is good that he is dead. May his omnicidal ideology soon join him in the arms of the cold, cold ground. May the insane, insatiable god he worshipped cease to gain recognition on this planet.

Lindsey Graham is dead. At least that’s one good thing. No matter what else happens today, they can’t take that away from us.

___________________

Caitlin’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

The best way to make sure you see everything I publish is to get on my free mailing list. My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece here are some options where you can toss some money into my tip jar if you want to. Click here for links for my social media, books, merch, and audio/video versions of each article. All my work is free to bootleg and use in any way, shape or form; republish it, translate it, use it on merchandise; whatever you want. All works co-authored with my husband Tim Foley.

Bitcoin donations: 1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Some Enchanted Evening

facebook.com/markprior.images

Denman Summer Morning

souls

#1743

Poisoning Our Way to a Better World?

Poisoning Our Way to a Better World?

By Leif LeBaron

I wonder how many people noticed the “Pesticide Use Notice” at Grassy Point (not to mention other areas along the shores of Hornby, Denman and Vancouver islands). The main information is transcribed here:

Permit #402-0689-25-25

Pesticide: imazapyr (Habitat Aqua)

Adjuvant (surfactant): Poly(oxy-1,2-ethanadiyl),alpha-undecyl-omega-hydroxy- (AquaSurf)

Purpose: kill cord grass (Spartinha spp.) in Baynes Sound

Contact: Becky Brown, Ministry of Forests, 250 739 8206

The notice also states that treatment areas are designated with yellow flags and recommends staying out for at least 48 hours, and those who might harvest sea asparagus should refrain for the calendar year. Children and animals are likely to be curious about these flagged areas and ironically attracted to them. Will these flags remain in place for the calendar year? It also seems essential to post a full notice at each treatment area, rather than a single notice posted distant and out of sight.

In any case, such precautions may help humans, but not the killdeer who nest in those areas, nor the other wild animal and plant inhabitants.

Imazapyr is non-selective, water-soluble and persistent. A 2004 Swedish study on railway spraying detected it in ground water eight years after application.

Glyphosate has also been deployed locally by the Coastal Invasive Species Committee in quiet complicity with local invasive species activists.

My personal experience with those who perpetrate and promote the deployment of biocide to combat invasive species has shown an alarming complacency. It’s not easy when they are indignant to criticism, high on their own good intentions, but I bid those of us who do recognise the folly of poisoning our way to a better world, please reach out and encourage alternatives.

Rachel Carson published Silent Spring in 1962. The biocides have changed but the proud pathology persists.

Shucking Oysters: Pipe Dreams

Shucking Oysters: Pipe Dreams

By Alex Allen

“Beautiful British Columbia” our licence plates proudly display. “Super Natural British Columbia” our brand announces. One campaign years ago featured a print ad showing three orcas surfacing against a majestic mountain backdrop with the tagline: “So many of our visitors return in Spring.” And so it is with supreme irony, that Alberta premier Danielle Smith finally gets her southern pipe dream.

Under the proposed route, the pipeline will move one-million-barrels-per-day of crude oil to the soon to be built Robert Banks Terminal 2 in Tsawwassen. The entire Roberts Bank terminal facility will span almost 640 acres, including a brand-new causeway and jetty that could be five kilometres long and an artificial island about the size of 330 football fields. Put another way, it could handle an additional two million 20-foot shipping containers each year.

The product will then be loaded onto the aptly named “Very Large Crude Carriers” that are three football fields long, six highway lanes wide, and 20 storeys tall. Each of these vessels will have a capacity of up to two million barrels of crude oil, with traffic increasing to 408 tankers a year (up from 60). In contrast, the current Aframax-size tankers have a capacity of 750,000 barrels. 

The oil tanker’s route will go through the home waters of the endangered southern resident killer whales and Western Canada Wilderness Committee’s Lucero Gonzales said that unless the route is changed, the species could be pushed to extinction.“It’s my worst nightmare. It’s an ecological nightmare. I don’t think a lot of us expected it,” Gonzales shared ominously. 

   

Last year, a federal court judge dismissed a lawsuit by the David Suzuki Foundation, the Georgia Strait Alliance, the Raincoast Conservation Foundation and the Western Canada Wilderness Committee that said the expansion project would destroy vital chinook salmon habitat, threatening the very survival of southern resident killer whales. The pollution, light, noise, dredging and physical obstacles will “starve the estuary” and impact the entire ecosystem environmental groups warn.

The impact assessment found there would also be impacts on Dungeness crab, barn owls, western sandpipers and many other species. Yet after the assessment, while the-then Minister of Environment and Climate Change Steven Guilbeault concluded that the project would have significant adverse effects, cabinet approved the terminal expansion anyways arguing that the public interest “superseded the impacts,” and therefore the project was justified. The judge determined that as long as mitigation conditions are “rationally connected to the likely adverse effects on the whales,” all is well with the world. Say what?

As many know, Guilbeault made no secret of his opinion that the Carney government was headed in the wrong direction on climate and left cabinet last year in protest of the Memorandum of Understanding Carney signed with Alberta. 

American Lovel Pratt, marine protection and policy director for Friends of the San Juans, warned: “This would significantly elevate the risk of catastrophic oil spills, vessel accidents, underwater noise pollution, and harm to endangered marine wildlife.” The increase in oil tanker traffic, Pratt added, “is especially alarming for the critically endangered southern resident killer whales, whose population currently numbers just 74.” Marine traffic noise and lights impact the whales’ abilities to hunt and communicate through echolocation. A large container ship can reduce a southern resident killer whale’s echolocation range from 400 metres in quiet conditions to just 60 metres.

Northern Washington first nations strongly opposed the previous Trans Mountain pipeline expansion and oppose this one as well. They argue that the large increase in vessel traffic endangers their treaty rights and threatens vital fisheries. If there’s a spill in the area, Pratt points out, “Oil knows no boundaries.”

The Union of BC Indian Chiefs also voiced concerns to the southern route. “If governments have accepted the longstanding opposition of Coastal First Nations on the north coast, they cannot simply move the proposal south and expect a different outcome,” said elected Chief Councillor Linda Innes.

“We have anxiety about the impact of any new pipeline project, period, on British Columbia’s coast,” Premier Eby told reporters. Eby acknowledged that permitting the new oil pipeline falls under federal jurisdiction and BC does not have the power to stop it. Carney said: “This is a representation of what we are all trying to accomplish to make Canada more independent, more resilient, more prosperous, more sustainable.” 

“The decision to uphold the north coast tanker ban and not proceed with a northern pipeline is a huge victory for the many coastal First Nations, businesses and concerned residents who have spent years fighting to protect it,” said Flossie Baker of Sierra Club BC. “However, Alberta and Ottawa’s pivot to green light a pipeline to British Columbia’s southern coast is a repeat of a dangerous and economically misguided decision: the infamously over-priced TMX pipeline.”

Both Alberta and the federal government reaffirmed their commitments in the Memorandum of Understanding, including completing a trilateral MOU with the Oil Sands Alliance on the Pathways Project and the controversial oil pipeline expansion. If the project moves forward, construction could start as early as September 2027, at an estimated cost of $43 billion. How it all unfolds we shall see. As former US diplomat Alan Eyre said, “a memorandum of understanding is as comprehensive of an agreement as a Tinder date is to marriage.”

Two Arrows

Gabriel Jeroschewitz, May 11th, 2026. Dedicated to and in memory of Joan Vollmer and Jack Kerouac

Two Arrows

The first arrow flies fast and true, and there is nothing we can do.

The second arrow – that is ours alone.

I first heard about the shooting in a jazz club in Greenwich Village, though “heard” isn’t quite the right word. The news of Joan Vollmer’s death travelled in silence through the Greenwich Village table of poets to those who were fond of William. They whispered of the murder in Mexico City and William’s unrelenting obsession with his wife, Joan. The man who perpetrated this crime on his sweet wife had killed her with a game of William Tell. He had drunk too much whiskey that fateful night in Mexico City and discharged his pistol into her head in an act of drunken misadventure that resulted in her death. This happened in 1951 when I was still very young. It would take years of exposure to the lives of other Beat writers to understand how the arrow of self-inflicted pain was aimed at ourselves over and over again.

I first encountered Jack Kerouac in 1956, when The Dharma Bums began travelling throughout the United States on their journeys of self-discovery. Jack moved through the world with a sense of wonder at existence and a longing to understand life’s meaning. He was also a man enamoured with Buddhism and the Eightfold Path as described in the sacred Buddhist texts, or sutras. In a conversation about his reasons for becoming interested in the religion, he told me of the tale of the arrow.

“Suffering is the first arrow,” he said, recalling the tale of the Zen master who told his students that while the first arrow of suffering would find them, they would release the second and aim it at themselves.

“Yes,” he said, “Over and over, we aim.”

He spoke with the authority of a man who knew the Buddhist teachings well. Yet I knew the Jack Kerouac before me was a man who chased enlightenment in his travels and in his habit of drinking bourbon into the early hours of the morning when his wife would often find him awake, wandering into the hallway with a glass of the amber liquid.

I encountered William Burroughs as an intellectual of the Beat Generation. A man who studied at Harvard University and penned the celebrated novel Naked Lunch, which would come to be considered a masterwork in the canon of Beat writers. Yet, the true masterwork of his mind was on the topic of his self-inflicted wounds.

On the night of the murder of his wife in Mexico City, I found William at an apartment on the Lower East Side of Manhattan. Paraphernalia of his quest for self-annihilation surrounded him. He spoke of his marriage to Joan with cool detachment. He spoke of the difficulties in their marriage. He confessed to having killed Joan in the act of his cruel, drunken, “William Tell” game. He insisted that he did not do it intentionally.

Yet, when he said these words in my presence, the air of the apartment became polluted with the truth of what a man had done for his own gratification at the cost of another’s life. Yet, he would serve thirteen days in prison in Mexico City for the crime of murder. His family would purchase his release from prison, and William Burroughs would walk free from the legal system that had targeted him for his violent act.

The second arrow has no enemy. William Burroughs did not need anyone but himself and the whiskey to commit the murder of his wife. This is the hidden architecture behind the Beat Generation. Yet, Jack Kerouac understood the dangers of self-inflicted wounds. In his novels, he portrayed many aspects of William Burroughs’ life – the cruelty and the pathos – the man who pursued enlightenment and self-actualization at the cost of everyone and everything in his life. For Jack Kerouac, William Burroughs was a man who sought both enlightenment and annihilation – the same impulse in two directions.

William Burroughs’ arrow burned brightest in the minds of his wife in Mexico City and in the lives of the generations of men and women who followed his path. Yet, when Jack Kerouac died at the age of forty-seven, the arrow had found him too. His last years of life were marked by bitterness and loneliness as he succumbed to whiskey. In comparison, William Burroughs endured another forty years of life as a celebrated, grand old man of letters whose most celebrated work was the murder of another human being and getting away with it.

Now, in the later years of my life, I often think of the arrow of suffering – the first arrow – and the second arrow that we aim at ourselves. The first arrow includes the deaths of our loved ones, the losses in our lives, and the betrayals of those who share our lives. These are unbidden tragedies of life. We cannot stop them. The second is our contribution to the arrow of suffering.

William Burroughs aimed the arrow at himself and his wife and fired the gun. Joan Vollmer died. The Beat Generation built monuments to the man who had taken her life. Kerouac dreamed of simple words to define the nature of existence and enlightenment. For Jack Kerouac, simple words came hard to find, and enlightenment eluded him throughout his life. Yet, the arrow of his self-inflicted wound eventually found him in whiskey and bitterness. He had understood suffering and enlightenment in his novels – yet could not escape it in his life.

The first arrow of suffering comes fast and true. The second?

The second arrow of suffering – we arm ourselves, point the gun at ourselves with trembling fingers – and we justify it to ourselves as an accident, an inevitability, the way things are. We pursue enlightenment and seek annihilation at the same time. Yet, what the Beat writers taught us – what we learned from their deaths and their lives – is the following truth:

Joan Vollmer died because a man aimed a gun at her head for amusement. William Burroughs died in prison, but walked out of jail and went on to become famous. Jack Kerouac wrote about Buddhism, but he died of whiskey. And the rest of us, who merely watched it all occur – the great cultural phenomenon of the Beat writers – we learned of the true path to hell and the arrows that we can fire into our own hearts over and over again.

Two arrows. Only two. And both of them are ours.

The Call Is Coming From Inside Our House  

The Call Is Coming From Inside Our House  

By Keith Porteous

Humanity is taught to fear rivals across borders, where we imagine civilization ending in mushroom clouds launched by adversarial powers, or in environmental collapse driven by distant factories and faraway governments. Yet the greatest danger does not come from some external adversary at all. It emerges from those who have accumulated extraordinary economic, technological, and political power within our own societies. The call is coming from inside our own house.

Over the past few decades, a new class of billionaires have risen alongside the digital revolution. Their companies build the software that mediates public discourse, the satellites that enable military weapons and communications, the cloud infrastructure that governments depend upon, and the artificial intelligence systems that promise to reshape every aspect of economic and political life for the human community. Their innovations have produced remarkable advances in military capabilities, which has also translated into unprecedented political power.

The tech-billionaires have been handed 100s of billions of dollars in military and surveillance contracts.

The concentration of wealth and power in a relatively small number of individuals creates incentives that deserve intense public scrutiny. Governments increasingly outsource critical infrastructure, intelligence capabilities, cybersecurity, cloud computing, and weapons technologies to private corporations. Military budgets have massively increased in response to manufactured geopolitical tensions, while those same tech-oligarchs and their corporations receive contracts worth tens of billions of dollars. 

The net worth and influence of tech-billionaires like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg and others has risen tenfold in the last 5 years, with their market capitalization now measured in trillions of dollars.]

The industrialists of the twentieth century supplied tanks, aircraft, steel, and oil. Today’s military industrialists increasingly supply satellites, autonomous systems, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, cloud infrastructure, DRONES, surveillance technologies, and advanced semiconductors. The products have changed, but the economic incentives have not.

These same billionaires shape public opinion with think tanks, media platforms, and lobbying organizations, while political actors benefit from portraying the world as being in permanent crisis, vilifying every geopolitical rival, with military expansion unfolding as the inevitable response. Fear is very profitable, while war generates unprecedented fortunes alongside its crimes and tragedies. 

Ecological collapse continues to accelerate, with rising temperatures, biodiversity loss, freshwater depletion, soil degradation, and increasingly destructive weather events that threaten the long-term stability of societies across the globe. The U.S.-NATO alliance is the single biggest carbon emitter on the planet.

Climate resilience efforts are unable to compete politically against military spending, with the U.S., Canada, and the NATO alliance increasing their spending by hundreds of billions of dollars, refusing to finance more renewable infrastructure, disaster preparedness, ecosystem restoration, or climate adaptation. This reflects the political priorities of an elite class of billionaires and their political operatives in government and media.

Western society’s most serious long-term threats are not rival nations, but systems of economic and political organization that reward short-term profit over collective survival. The irony is striking.

Artificial intelligence and digital platforms enable the hoarding of wealth, data, and political control on an unprecedented scale. Technological power is inseparable from political influence, where billionaires who control communications infrastructure, own major media platforms, finance political campaigns, advise governments, and shape public opinion while securing military contracts, occupy a position unlike any private citizen in human history.

Democratic institutions are not designed to manage high levels of concentrated economic influence, but to enable them. These dynamics can be found wherever economic power becomes sufficiently concentrated to shape legislation, regulation, media narratives, and public priorities. Oligarchic influence is unrestrained by democratic oversight, independent journalism, or resistance to regulatory capture.

Power has become self-legitimizing simply because it arrives wrapped in innovation. The greatest mistake would be to imagine that civilization collapses only through dramatic events like a nuclear exchange, or a catastrophic environmental tipping point. Decline is unfolding as neoliberal capitalist society weakens, and economic inequality widens. Citizens have rightly lost trust in democratic processes, while discourse fragments into algorithmically optimized outrage. 

Military expenditures rise while ecological systems deteriorate. Each development is unmanageable on its own, but together they are catastrophic.

Civilizations don’t fail because they misidentify every existential threat, but because they overlook the internal arrangements that slowly erode their own foundations. If humanity is to avoid war, climate change, and technological disruption simultaneously, it must be willing to examine the incentives embedded within its own political and economic systems. 

The greatest danger is not outside the walls. The call is coming from inside our house.