Home Blog Page 126

What Is Security? (Part 2)

WHAT IS SECURITY? Sally Campbell

(Part 2)

The new movie “Israelism” (available for rent on Kinema) is a must-see eye-opener into the tight connections of North American Jews with the State of Israel. It offers much “insider” insight into just why it is so painfully difficult for many Jews to even call for a ceasefire to the ongoing genocide in Gaza. Their Judaism has been linked with Israel at the basic level of identity. If my security as a human being is intrinsically linked with the idea of Israel, right or wrong, then how can I be safe if I let go of that idea?

Peter Beinart, highly-respected American journalist, professor and writer, an Orthodox Jew who has moved inexorably away from Zionism, recently hosted Palestinian Fadi Quran, advocacy officer for Avaaz, on his weekly zoom call. Quran is a remarkable person with degrees from Stanford, who has long been engaged in policy development for Al-Shabaka, the Palestinian Policy Network. He lives in the West Bank, 200 yards away from “extremist settlers” and never knows when his door will be broken down, his family attacked, or he will be arrested, perhaps imprisoned. Nonetheless, his deep humanity shone out when he reiterated the importance for Israeli Jews of safety and security, (especially given the historic inherited trauma that has been triggered since October 7th.) As he said, they completely deserve to have security after a long history of anti-semitism culminating in the Holocaust, but the ideology of Zionism has done the reverse, because ironically Zionism has, seeded within it, some of the key racist/supremacist beliefs that earlier Europeans had against Jews. Quran said that Jews do not have security in Israel, and they do not feel safe. In his view, there are now 3 scenarios for Israel-Palestine:

  1. Commitment to freedom, justice & dignity for all “from the river to the sea”, beginning with a ceasefire and an end to the Occupation, legal protections of religion & culture for both Israelis and Palestinians, an interim government which includes Palestinian political prisoners like Marwan Barghouti in the leadership, not the PLO, followed by inclusive elections. He compares Hamas to the Republican Party and says they will have to be included in peace negotiations.
  1. A return to the status quo of occupation, apartheid, and repression of Palestinian resistance – what most Israelis think they need.
  1. Continuing the genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, aiming for their erasure – what Israel’s far-right wants, and which may well lead to a regional war involving nuclear-armed nations.

It is pretty clear that only the first scenario can possibly lead to safety and security for everyone. No one is secure until all are secure.

The Course on Miracles points out that we either come from a place of love or a place of fear. When our security needs are driven by fear responses, we’re locked into a self-fulfilling cycle. Ironically, the 2.3 million Palestinians imprisoned in Gaza were, prior to October, in certain ways more secure than the Israelis living so close by yet in another world – one with reliable electricity, clean water, abundant food, housing, access to education, medicines, building materials and freedom to move – all of which have long been denied Gazans. Palestinians’ deep family ties and their practice of “sumud” (steadfastness) gives them an inner security Jewish

Israelis cannot find as long as they remain the oppressors in a modern-day settler-colonial project.

But who decides Israel must change?

The international commons can decide to influence Israel to stop using military responses to address its security needs, primarily by ending financial support for its devastating agenda, and refusing arms trade with Israel. The U.S. gives Israel a minimum of $3.8 billion/year. Both Canada and the US also provide charitable tax receipts for hundreds of millions of dollars of donations to Israel annually, mostly for the illegal settlement enterprise or the Israeli military. That can stop with citizen pressure. Why do Canadian taxpayers need to subsidize (to the tune of

$1/2 B/year) the illegal settlements and military in a country with the same GDP as Sweden? Particularly when that country is under investigation by the world’s highest court, the ICJ, for genocide?

The community of nations can also decide to pressure Israel to end its occupation, its siege of Gaza and its apartheid regime. Until those things happen, we can all decide to support the non- violent Palestinian call for BDS. Israelis and Palestinians can then decide together what their form of governance will look like, and what constitutes security for all. There is no way out, only through.

CNN’s CEO Is Making Staff Churn Out Israel Propaganda

 

CNN’s CEO Is Making Staff Churn Out Israel Propaganda

 
 

Listen to a reading of this article (reading by Tim Foley):

One of the noblest and most important things a western journalist can do these days is help expose the propagandistic manipulations of the mainstream western press institutions who have duped our civilization into consenting to a profoundly dysfunctional status quo which does not serve the interests of normal human beings. Unfortunately this rarely happens, because western journalists tend to view the mainstream press as allies and potential employers.

This happens to be one such rare occasion, and it happened in one of the last placesyou’d probably have guessed if you follow mass media propaganda with a critical eye. The Guardian has a great new article out titled “CNN staff say network’s pro-Israel slant amounts to ‘journalistic malpractice’” by a guy named Chris McGreal which cites multiple CNN staff members and internal documents to reveal the immense top-down pressure in the network to tilt coverage heavily in favor of Israel.

McGreal writes the following:

“CNN is facing a backlash from its own staff over editorial policies they say have led to a regurgitation of Israeli propaganda and the censoring of Palestinian perspectives in the network’s coverage of the war in Gaza.

“Journalists in CNN newsrooms in the US and overseas say broadcasts have been skewed by management edicts and a story-approval process that has resulted in highly partial coverage of the Hamas massacre on 7 October and Israel’s retaliatory attack on Gaza.

“‘The majority of news since the war began, regardless of how accurate the initial reporting, has been skewed by a systemic and institutional bias within the network toward Israel,’ said one CNN staffer. ‘Ultimately, CNN’s coverage of the Israel-Gaza war amounts to journalistic malpractice.’”

McGreal’s sources say CNN’s wildly biased coverage of Israel’s assault on Gaza is the direct result of edicts from the network’s new CEO Mark Thompson, who assumed his role two days after the October 7 attack. From 2012 to 2020 Thompson was the president and CEO of The New York Times, which is currently experiencing its own internal strife due to the pro-Israel bias of that outlet. 

Before his NYT executive gig Thompson was the director-general of the BBC, where he came under fire multiple times for the pro-Israel bias he imposed on the British state broadcaster. In 2005 he held meetings in Jerusalem with then-Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon with the reported aim to “build bridges with the country’s political class,” immediately after which he removed BBC correspondent Orla Guerin from Jerusalem following accusations of “antisemitism” made against her by the Israeli government. In 2009 he was hotly criticized for choosing not to air the Disasters Emergency Committee appeal for Gaza, and in 2011 he presided over the decision to censor the lyrics “free Palestine” from a performance by rapper Mic Righteous on BBC Radio 1Xtra.

This is the sort of person who gets hired to multiple executive positions in multiple highly influential western media platforms. If you’ve ever wondered why it looks like the western press function in pretty much the same way as the state propaganda services in the autocracies the west proudly sets itself apart from, this is why. The corporate media are owned and controlled by plutocrats who have a vested interest in preserving the status quo power structure upon which their kingdoms are built, and state broadcasters like the BBC have the same interest for the same reason. They decide who the executives of those outlets will be, and those executives make policy and hiring decisions which cause the outlet to function in a way that is indistinguishable from state propaganda.

These are the people who’ve been pulling the wool over the eyes of the mainstream public and manipulating the masses into thinking, speaking, working, consuming, and voting in ways that serve the interests of the ruling power structure. In this way they are able to ensure that revolutionary opposition to that power structure remains a fringe minority position, even as that power structure wages wars, sponsors genocides, destroys the biosphere, and keeps everyone poor, sick, and stupid.

Our world will never see the revolutionary changes it desperately needs until the people begin using the power of their numbers to force those changes to happen, and the people will never start using the power of their numbers to force revolutionary change as long as they are being manipulated by propagandists into accepting the status quo. Our task therefore, as people who love truth and desire a healthy world, is to begin waking the public up to the reality that everything they’ve been told about their society, their government and their world is a lie, and pointing them toward true information about what’s really going on.

That’s how humanity will awaken from its propaganda-induced coma to create a healthy world: one pair of eyelids at a time. This might sound like a slow-going project, but for every newly opened pair of eyes there is one more voice who can help wake up the others, which means exponential growth is possible. This is how we move humanity into the light of truth and begin the shift toward a truth-based society.

And we’ve got an advantage: the empire needs to use human beings to generate its propaganda. That’s what we’re seeing in CNN staff turning against their boss and reporting his malfeasance to another news outlet. As long as the empire depends on ordinary human beings to turn its gears and facilitate its horrific atrocities, there’s always the possibility that the next pair of eyes to open will be someone on the inside.

________________________________________________________________________

My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece here are some options where you can toss some money into my tip jar if you want to. Go here to buy paperback editions of my writings from month to month. All my work is free to bootleg and use in any way, shape or form; republish it, translate it, use it on merchandise; whatever you want. The best way to make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list on Substack, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. All works co-authored with my husband Tim Foley.

 

Bitcoin donations: 1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Featured image via Adobe Stock.

The Dance of Rejection

The Dance of Rejection

I reject you

You reject me

You reject me

I reject you

And so the story goes

No one wins

And the heart becomes heavy

With all the grudges it must remember to hold

I would rather build a bridge

There is more that connects us, 

Than divides us

I place my armour down

May love win

Green Wizardries: The Rites of Spring

Green Wizardries, The Rites of Spring by Maxine Rogers

Spring is here and I am seeing a lot of orchards that could really have used some summer pruning last year.  It is vastly easier to rub off buds of branches forming where you do not want them in June than to let the tree waste its energy forming branches you have to clip off in February.  Summer pruning causes the tree to put more energy into fruit production than branch production.  

If you didn’t summer prune, you will have a lot more work now.  My life got a lot easier when Kate Janeway came to the Garden Club one year and explained the basics of pruning and the advantages of summer pruning.  If you have a calendar, it is a great idea to write in a little reminder at the beginning of June that now is the time for all good orchardists  to get pruning.  

Even with summer pruning, I still have to get out there and give the trees a little haircut.  When I do, I take a plastic ziplock bag with a clean rag and a bottle of Dettol disinfectant.  I wipe down my pruning saw, loppers and secateurs before starting on a tree.  This helps to prevent the spread of diseases from one tree to the next.  

This is also a great time to spread lime in the orchard and to give the fig trees an extra helping of lime and a generous helping of bone meal.  Figs are not pruned the way we would prune an apple or a peach tree.  Figs produce fruit on the ends of their branches so you don’t clip the branches back.  With figs, you have to look at the tree and think, which branch will I not be able to reach this summer?  Then prune the whole branch out to keep the fig tree open in the centre and with branches you can hope to reach in the summer.  

If you have a polytunnel, now is a good time to leave some seed potatoes out in a tray in a sunny windowsill to go green and develop shoots.  The potatoes can be planted in the polytunnel or a cold frame at the end of the month and this will get you the first new potatoes a full month early and they are such a delicacy.  Steam them and serve them tossed with butter and herbs.

I had a crop of  Windsor broad beans planted out in October and they were doing well but an extreme cold snap killed them off.  I will plant some more of the Broad Windsors this month but will wait until March to plant out the Jerusalem broad beans as they are from the Levant and are just that bit more tender.  

A friend on Hornby grew a great crop of Jerusalem broad beans last year and confessed she didn’t really know what to do with them.  They are a very versatile bean.  Just soak them overnight and bring them to a boil and turn the heat down and simmer them until they are tender.  Drain and toss them with whatever salad dressing you like, add some fresh chopped onions, dried tomatoes and peppers, whatever herbs you like and you have an excellent bean salad that is a good meal in itself and also a great side dish.  

Jerusalems also make great baked beans and soup beans.  Broad beans were originally used to make hummus before people started to use chickpeas.  The Arab World and the Horn of Africa uses them to make a sort of bean porridge that they eat for breakfast.  It is called Ful and will keep you full all day.  Try it spiced with cumin and olive oil.  

February is also the time to start some seeds.  If you have a good spot in your house which is bright but not too hot and not too cold, you can start celery, onion, leek and celeriac seeds now. I also started sweet peas, German chamomile which makes a great tea, hyssop and calendula.  I started these flowers in an unheated greenhouse.  I pot up extra sweet peas to give to friends.  Peas don’t like having their roots disturbed.  The sweet peas are planted out without dividing the plants and they do very well.  

Calendulas are a very hardy flower and I am only planting them now to speed up the blooming time.  Calendulas are an excellent flower to grow for pollinators.  They really increase the number and diversity of wild creatures visiting your garden.  This in turn helps create a balanced environment where no one creature gets out of balance.  Calendulas are deer resistant and make a pretty cut flower.  

Inside the house I am starting Cosmos daisies and alyssum under the lights on my propagating shelf.  Both flowers are very pretty and attractive to pollinators.  The cosmos attract a lot of butterflies and moths and the alyssum attracts many smaller pollinators as well as smelling like honey.   Good luck with the Rites of Spring.

lugubrious goo

1 7 24 lugubrious goo

As a child when I was sickly my mother used to lather my chest with vapour rub.

The sheen of white gel smelled like the disinfectants at the pool of the YMCA.

The sheet stuck to me as I tossed and turned

and in the coarse drawl of my breath I could hear voices in a squeaky timbre from my congested lungs.

I was fascinated by the whispers

I breathed deep just to hear the rattle.

My mother said my chest was my weakness.

Back when I popped acid like cough candies I smoked over three packs of cigarettes on a sixteen hour trip.

My fingers turned orange and my tongue turned green

and the chest rattle reappeared with a vengeance, my mind and body filled with a nasty lugubrious goo.

At eighteen my doctor told me if I kept it up I’d be dead by thirty-five.

I made some changes

but this chest cold I’ve had of late brings back some old memories

and a bit of that lugubrious goo.

Matoes Story

Apples

Apples

by Mr. Unknown

Take a chomp 

Crisp and sweet

A wonderful snack

A fine treat

Try a red delicious

Or a tart granny smith

Or whatever variety

Vital for a spirit lift

Put them in pies

Or in a gooey crumble

Cut them into slices

To cure stomach rumble

A truly great fruit

Great as health food

To refuse an apple

Is being quite rude

Phoenix Riting! – February 1st, 2024

This is my third attempt at a column this week. I write, I reread, then sigh and start over. So many wrong ways to say the right thing. The Island Grapevine’s cancelling is, I am led to believe (not by the publisher, who has been nothing but gracious), my own doing. An article I wrote in these pages back in July caused certain people, within an hour of my article seeing print, to lose their minds and rush to cancel the publication. “Fire the publisher from his job! Kick him off the board he sits on! Boycott the Grapevine! Boo hiss!”

 

I didn’t learn anything of this for months, but it’s turned into a Huge Big Deal, and the cancelling appears to be working. Now, it’s trickled down to me, because my platform is disappearing. How bizarre. I’ve struggled to make sense of it ever since, because to my mind, my article was, while controversial, fairly inoffensive. Call me naive, but I did not expect this outcome, especially given the controversial nature of so many other opinions expressed in the same paper. It’s what the Grapevine stands for–freedom of expression.

 

I’ve had my wrong thinking explained to me, patiently and in depth, and while I’m grateful to those people who took the time to try to lay out exactly how my column was problematic, their responses failed to convince. Nobody called me hateful or a bigot, though I found out later that those words were used behind the scenes. Everything they said seemed like a reason to write a heated letter to the editor, not cause to cancel the publication that dared to platform me. And then there’s this: the vast majority of the by-now copious feedback I received has been approving, most often along the lines of “I would never dare, but thank you!”

 

The trouble with humans is our tendency to polarize–to believe that if something is right, then the opposite of that thing must be wrong. But that is simply not true. Multiple things can be true at the same time. The opposite of a right is not necessarily a wrong; quite often it’s another right. It’s daytime here, but you’d be wrong to argue the point with someone in Australia, where it’s night. Context is everything.

 

People are complicated; needs can come into conflict, but that doesn’t necessarily make one person’s need wrong and another’s right. Relationships break up all the time because of conflicting needs, without either of them having to be in the wrong. For any controversy, there are so many ways to look at it, and how we see it depends entirely on point of view.

 

It’s so easy to dismiss the suffering of whoever we view to be in the wrong, but pain is pain. To dehumanize someone, to demonize them or diminish them, is itself wrong. When we get to know someone, to understand the history and subjectivity of their pain, we can only empathize, and so they begin to become real to us, and no longer so wrong. Demonizing opposition, calling them the enemy is a tool of war; we should resist the impulse to do so at all costs.

 

If we are not allowed to publicly discuss and weigh the balance between conflicting rights, then terrible wrongs inevitably follow. People perceive reality differently from each other, depending on their lived experience and point of view. Individuals are differently vulnerable. People with disabilities, mental illness or neurodivergence, poverty, survivors of war, trauma, misogynistic oppression, all suffer, and all matter. It makes no sense to hierarchize suffering as though the pain of some should weigh more than the pain of others.

 

We are still a long way from a fair and equitable society, and in order to grow, we need to talk about it. We need to bring forward the arguments in favour of and against, to weigh consequences, to find balance. Everyone deserves to live freely and authentically as their true selves, no matter who they are. 

 

Note: TIG has been a unique resource and outlet for folks to share their opinions the old-fashioned way, in a local paper, accessed by the community. If you support the Grapevine, and want it to survive and continue to be a committed, free speech voice for our communities, please consider advertising or submitting some form of paid content.

 

That’s what I think. What do you think? email me at phoenixonhornby@gmail.com

Shucking Oysters: The First Edition with a Balsamic Reduction

Shucking Oysters: The First Edition with a Balsamic Reduction

By Alex Allen

Full disclosure: I am editor of the iconic monthly Hornby Island paper, The First Edition. 

It is no easy task being the editor of a paper, let alone an editor of a small community paper. People have no issues calling you up and giving you shit about something someone else wrote. Or accosting you at the local grocery store because you didn’t publish their article. There are no boundaries in small communities. If someone has a beef, you are most definitely going to hear about it either from the horse’s mouth or some other aperture.

It’s a thankless job. No matter how much you try to please one and all, and print the paper without any noticeable glitches, there will always be some curve ball tossed your way. The gig is not for the faint-hearted, that’s for sure. Criticism is long and praise sparse. For every compliment we receive, there are dozens of complaints. I often think that I must enjoy the abuse or just a little. 

It always surprises me that someone can come up to you in public, face-to-face, and tell you how terrible they think you are, just because they don’t like something you wrote. It’s even worse when you, Gawd forbid make a mistake, which we all do from time to time, because we’re human. Thankfully, I am not on social media, so I remain blissfully oblivious and protected from the other unruly mob. 

I’ve lost count how many times I’ve received angry phone calls and emails from individuals because their submission was not in the paper. The occasional email, yes, I may have somehow humanly missed, but when I get reamed out because someone had the wrong email address, sorry, that’s not my problem. But, apparently it is very much my problem. In my eight years as editor, I have published every article submitted except for one because it was horribly written. Another time, I had to edit out a Nazi analogy in an article, because it upset our printer. Other than that I have been fairly mellow in my role and most readers have been generous in compliments.

Our masthead reads, “Ingredients of articles and letters do not necessarily represent the tastes of the editor, nor is their accuracy guaranteed or true meaning often understood. We do, however, encourage diverse opinions that may or may not represent your views, but do reflect the content of our very diverse community.” In other words, the First Edition is not some homogenized version of our community. We don’t all love our neighbours, but we certainly tolerate them. 

Underneath my desk I have a pile of First Editions dating back to the 80s and 90s (that someone graciously unloaded on me). Randomly reading a few the other day, the obvious thing was the amount of advertising. In the old double-sided legal version, a 30-page 1994 First Edition had a colossal 53 ads (many full page ads). The masthead indicated there were 25 individuals involved in getting the paper out, from typesetting (before computers) to collating. 

The February 2024, 32-page First Edition? Twenty-four ads, mostly business card size and only four individuals at the helm. One to edit and do the layout, two to collate, one to bill, and one to print. At one point, the editor and printer were paid. Then just the layout person and printer. Then the editor and printer. And during my time, only the printer is paid. It’s a labour of love, obviously.

And now, every paper is struggling with the clusterf*ck of social media. Just last week, our local credit union (a regular advertiser for years) announced that they will no longer be advertising in The First Edition. Instead, they will be “pivoting their marketing strategy towards digital channels that enable them to better measure results.” I think that’s a polite way of saying, “You’re so old-school.” 

In 2028, it will be the First Edition’s 50th anniversary. Like a 99-year-old holding on for dear life for the milestone, we are hoping we can at least survive until that time. Our printer and billing person are retiring this year, which is another change of the times. The volunteers are getting old; we’re all getting old. Are newspapers as well? Last year, 29 local community newspapers shut down in Canada and I’m sure more to follow. 

The closure of local news outlets has left a significant communication gap in many small communities, making it challenging to inform those who are not active on social media. In the First Edition, we have community news, from our ratepayers’ reports to emergency preparedness updates and every other group in between. Some excellent writer’s contribute their thoughts in poem and narrative. There are calendars of events from theatre to quilting. And there is always a local group or person highlighted in some way. We are community.

As one former staffer of the now deceased Kamloops Weekly said, “We all care. That’s why we do this. We’re not in it to get rich. We care about our communities. And we think what we do is important, so that’s why we’re doing it.” 

But the reality of small newspapers is they’re basically ads with stories in them. In the end, as Jeff Benziger wrote, “your work ends up in scrapbooks or for wrapping fish or lining bird cages.” Or fire starter.   

Trivia Night: A Fundraiser for Local Students February 17, 2024

Attention all Trivia buffs and their friends!  The Denman Island Community School, the Parent Advisory Committee and the Denman Island Community Education Society are hosting a fantastic evening at the community hall that you’re going to love!  Bring the whole family for a night of fun, food, games and prizes!

TRIVIA NIGHT – Saturday February 17, 2024

Denman Island Community Hall

  • Doors at 5:00 pm
  • Food galore! 
  • Games start at 6:00 pm with Quiz Master Daniel Farrow and special guests!
  • Kid’s Party in the Hub starts at 5:30

Registration on NOW until February 12!

Sign up a full team of 8; if you only have a partial team or want to join as an individual, please sign up!  We will connect folks to make full teams.  Registration forms are available online – check the local social media bulletin boards for the link.  If you prefer phone or email, we can help you with the registration process.  Cost is $20/person – no one turned away for lack of funds – just ask by email at dices.communityprograms@gmail.com or call us at 250-335-2058.

This is a FUNDRAISER for the Denman Island Community School Parent Advisory Committee and Denman Island Community Education Society with support from the Denman Island Community School.  Together we are raising funds in support of educational and recreational opportunities for Denman students.  

We hope to see you there, Saturday February 17, 2024 at the Denman Island Community Hall.