Home Blog Page 12

Pick up a chair, walk through the door, and sit on the floor.

Antique wooden chair with cane isolated on white - 3/4 Front view

Ladies. And Jelly spoons, I am in front of you. Behind you. To tell you something, I know nothing about.

Next Thursday, which is Good Friday, we are having a ladies’ meeting only for men.

Admission is free. Pay a dollar, pick up a chair, walk through the door, and sit on the floor.

 

Pick up a chair, walk through the door, and sit on the floor. 

Gabriel Jeroschewitz, April 17th,  2026. This is taken from a childhood rhyme. I remember from when I was 8 years old; its stayed with me ever since. Im not sure why, its silly, and I thought Id write a story about it,

 

The auditorium was established in a world before the arrival of those who would temporarily come to fill it with their presence. From the mezzanine – the afterthought of the structures architects – I surveyed the empty rows of chairs that would one day be filled by those who would come to sit through the performance of a myth that was to be enacted before them. The fluorescence of the lights above signified the presence of some purpose for the establishment, but never stated what that purpose would be.

He appeared through the door that was both entrance and exit all at once. The audience that filled the room comprised those who had come to see the world’s myths wear thin in the modern age. Each of them was of an age when their biographies had taught them to expect disappointment in their lives, but never with such regularity as this.

Ladies,” he began, and jelly spoons.”

In Mythologies, I have written of the steak-and-frites as a symbol of nationalism in the nations diet, and of the striptease as an act representing mans metaphysical connection to woman. Yet, I had never written of the jelly spoon, nor considered it as a symbol of anything within the world of modern myths. Yet here he was, addressing the audience of jelly spoons, and I felt the tragedy of the audience members all at once.

I am in front of you,” he said, standing in a position of presence before them, yet also behind them at the same time.

The audience turned. Yet he was not behind them. But within the world of myth, he was present before and behind them at once. The audience members all turned to him, but I thought of the photograph from the age of mechanical reproduction. The image of the audience members here had not lost its aura but had instead grown wild, spreading throughout the auditorium.

To tell you something I know nothing about.”

Franz Austin wrote of speech acts that could perform actions upon the world of language; this was such an act performed before the audience. Each audience member leaned forward into the performance of this act, recognizing it as an exhumation of Enlightenment myths.

Next Thursday. Which is Good Friday?”

Thursday is the day when Thor and Jupiter are honoured throughout the Western world. Yet on this day that would become Good Friday, the audience understood the myth hanging before them, for they all knew in their minds and hearts that the upcoming Thursday would be Good Friday. For on this day, the sacrifice of Christ occurred throughout time. Thus, for the audience members who were modern in age and understanding, this day did not appear on their calendars but rather within the mythologies surrounding the Christian religion.

We’re having a ladies meeting, only for men.”

The myth of the lady and the importance of the female in society were examined before the audience. The ladies’ meeting was to be open only to men in attendance. Thus, all audience members were excluded from the meeting they were supposed to attend. Yet they were also included in the myth of the lady meeting, yet they were only ever the sign of the ladies. The tragedy of the audience members was the recognition that they had never been anything other than.

Admission free. Pay a dollar.”

The paradox of the situation drew laughter from those who understood the logic of the modern world. To pay for something free was the logic of the leisure industry. The dollar was paid for the void in the auditorium. One man in the third row – whose posture indicated his former position as an accountant for a firm – paid for his own absence in the world by handing over his bill. Yet, he was paying for nothing at all.

Pick up a chair, walk through the door, and sit on the floor.”

The instruction was that of a Zen koan stripped of its enlightenment. Chairs are symbols of the Western world and of humanity’s expectation that people remain seated in the presence of others. Yet the audience members were instructed to pick up their chairs, walk through the door separating them from the rest of the building, and sit on the floor surrounding the stage: the floor, the base of humanity, the fond.

The audience members followed the directions set before them. Chairs were picked up by those whose joints had likely borne the consequences of decades of sitting in their homes and workplaces. The door opened onto a wall within the building. Each of the men sat on the carpeted concrete floor, their spines turned towards the floor as if in the shape of question marks, their empty chairs remaining beside them.

You may find this a bit confusing,” the man said to the audience members who had all followed the directions set for them, but it’s completely rational.”

The audience members understood what he was referring to. The rationality he spoke of was the rationality of the office that they had filled for years. The rationality of their marriages that failed over time. The audience members recognized this rationality.

Like most things in this humanity.”

He paused here, allowing for a few breaths between the audience members and himself. Yet, he continued by stating the following:

The so-called humanity.”

The scare quotes were audible throughout the speech. For he was referring to the biological term humanity as a collection of the species homo sapiens, and instead referred to their existence as merely the sign of their existence within the world.

Like Aristotle said. A thing is itself and not something else.”

Aristotle wrote of the necessity of objects existing in their own right, not in place of another thing. Yet, the audience members understood from this revelation that the man wanted to be something else, for they desired to be the jelly spoons. They desired to be the ladies of the ladiesmeeting, for they craved to know something of the nothingness that was occupying the world today.

The speaker was gone, as all speakers often become when the signifier consumes the signified. Each audience member remained on the floor. They would remain on the floor until the next Thursday, until the next Good Friday, until the jelly spoons rusted and the dollars turned to confetti. For they were waiting for the meeting to occur – this meeting for men that was actually a ladiesmeeting, this admission that was free of entry cost them anything.

When the audience members parted from the auditorium, I carried the myth with me. Yet outside the building, the sun was setting on what would have been another day of the week. The chairs remained empty beside me. The floor was just the floor. Yet I knew – I who had stood in the mezzanine above the audience members, who had commented upon each of their actions, who had stood both in front of and behind them – that I, too, was a jelly spoon in the world, awaiting to be addressed.

Letter to the Editor – Sally Campbell

Dear Editor:

Kudos to Cylon 2036 for their May 7, 2026, Grapevine piece: “The Kabuki Politics of Mark Carney.”  Discouraging, to say the least, but brilliantly expressed and so accurately detailed. This is a must read, lest we are lulled to sleep by Carney’s “masterclass in tonal distinction.”  Thank you for giving us this artful analysis!

Sally Campbell

Nobody Sincerely Believes Cuba Threatens The United States

Nobody Sincerely Believes Cuba Threatens The United States

Reading by Tim Foley:

In a sign that the US is preparing for yet another evil war, Marco Rubio is now claimingthat Cuba poses a “national security threat” to the United States, saying the likelihood of a peaceful agreement is “not high”.

“Cuba not only has weapons that they’ve acquired from Russia and China over the years, but they also host Russian and Chinese intelligence presence in their country — not far from where we’re standing right now,” Rubio told the press on Thursday. “So Cuba has always posed a national security threat to the United States. They, by the way, have been one of the leading sponsors of terrorism in the entire region.”

Rubio’s comments come as a US intelligence report laundered through Axios claims that Cuba may be preparing to launch a drone strike against US military forces. Havana said the Axios report misrepresents Cuba’s defensive measures as a preparation to attack, accusing the US of “fabricating pretexts, creating and spreading falsehoods, and distorting as extraordinary the logical preparation required to face a potential aggression.”

The US has also unsealed an indictment for Raul Castro, the 94 year-old brother of Fidel Castro, in a move that resembles the playbook used for the kidnapping of Venezuela’s President Nicolas Maduro.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The excuses for military action are already being rolled out. This happens as US war machinery relocates to the Caribbean, and as Cuba flounders under a crushing US oil blockade that is already inflicting a severe humanitarian toll.

And everyone knows it’s all based on lies. You know it. I know it. Marco Rubio knows it. The war propagandists know it. The gusanos brigading social media begging for war know it. We all know it’s a sham.

Not one person sincerely believes Cuba poses a threat to the United States.

No one sincerely believes Cuba just coincidentally became an urgent menace to US national security all of a sudden right when the US began scrambling to consolidategeostrategic control in the middle east and the western hemisphere.

Nobody actually thinks that a tiny, impoverished island nation is preparing to launch a war of aggression against the United States.

This is a performance put on by warmongers and bootlickers. It insults our intelligence and robs us of dignity.

 

 

 

 

 

 

If things cool down with Iran, then it’s a safe bet they’re going in for the kill shot on Cuba. The US empire never makes peace, it just moves the crosshairs of its war machinery from nation to nation.

We see this over and over again.

Yay! The troops are leaving Afghanistan — oh, now they’re waging a proxy war in Ukraine.

Excellent, they’re deescalating against Yemen — whoa, now they’re kidnapping the president of Venezuela.

Oh hey, it looks like the mass slaughter in Gaza has slowed down — oh, now they’re going to war with Iran.

Look, they’re pulling thousands of troops out of Germany — oh, it’s so they can move them to Poland.

Hey these Iran negotiations are finally getting somewhere — ah man, now they’re invading Cuba.

Over and over and over and over again. As soon as the human butchery slows down in one place, it picks up somewhere else.

The US empire exists in a constant state of war. War is the glue that holds the empire together. If the wars stop, the empire stops.

That’s why the denizens of the empire are never allowed to vote for an end to wars. You can vote for candidates who will end abortions or trans rights or corporate regulations, but you can’t vote for a candidate who will actually end the wars. Peace is never on the ballot, because war is too critical for the functioning of the empire.

Which is why it’s so important for us all to stand against the war machine. If we can end the wars, we can end the empire. Not until then will we have a shot at building a healthy world.

___________________

Caitlin’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

The best way to make sure you see everything I publish is to get on my free mailing list. My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece here are some options where you can toss some money into my tip jar if you want to. Click here for links for my social media, books, merch, and audio/video versions of each article. All my work is free to bootleg and use in any way, shape or form; republish it, translate it, use it on merchandise; whatever you want. All works co-authored with my husband Tim Foley.

Bitcoin donations: 1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Feature image via The White House (public domain).

brain on drugs

#1736

The Voice of Hind Rajab, movie screening

The Denman Island Palestine Solidarity Group will be hosting a screening of “The Voice of Hind Rajab” on Sunday, May 24th at 2p.m. at the Denman Community Hall. This Academy Award nominated film tells of the last hours in the life of 5 -year -old Hind Rajab and her extended family as they try to evacuate from Gaza during the ongoing genocide. 

  In an interview with Amnesty International, Hind’s mother, Wesam Hamada talks about her daughter and why she feels compelled to keep Hind’s memory alive. When asked what does it mean to her to have Hind remembered in this way, she replied, ” The film represents not only Hind’s story, but the stories of thousands of children in Gaza. More than 20,000 children have been killed in Gaza. The film documents this crime. And this documentation will be there for generations to come.”  To read her full interview go to https://www.amnestyusa.org/blog/wesam-hamada-i-want-to-keep-hinds-voice-alive-because-hers-is-the-voice-of-all-the-children-of-gaza/

Amid ongoing efforts to discredit Francesa Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories and Karim Khan, Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) watching this film is a small act of resistance. Supporting the work of those who refuse to be silent is necessary if we are going to stop the ongoing genocide of Palestinians.

The film is a docu-drama that uses audio from the 911 calls between Hind and members of the Palestinian Red Crescent Society trying to rescue her. For those wishing to debrief there will be a sharing circle after with light refreshments. This film is not suitable for children. This event is by donation with all proceeds going to the Hind Rajab Foundation. 

The Hind Rajab Foundation (HRF) was established to honour the memory of Hind Rajab and all those who have been killed or suffered under the genocide. To this end the HRF has filed criminal complaints and cases at the ICC and in several countries. For those who wish to donate but cannot attend go to

THE HIND RAJAB FOUNDATION

 

THE HIND RAJAB FOUNDATION

https://www.hindrajabfoundation.org

How Do We Know Governments are Lying?

How Do We Know Governments are Lying?  By Keith Porteous (Op-Ed)

While you may have heard about Prime Minister Carneys deal to essentially pre-approve and fast track another pipeline to the B.C coast, you may have missed Premier David Ebys announcement of the Phase 2 doubling of capacity of the Coastal GasLink Pipeline at the Kitimat terminal that was rammed through Wetsuweten unceded territories, where the hereditary indigenous land defenders were criminalized for defending their right to free, prior, and informed consent to resource development on their lands. Even the moderate human rights organization Amnesty International declared this as a brutal and repressive violation, while the B.C. Supreme Court ruled against the violence and racism of RCMP premeditated actions against the Wet’suwet’en people, who they have been covertly surveilling for many years.

A year after the election of PM Mark Carney, you may be confused, asking the question: what the hell is going on? The elected representatives of the Crown pay lip service to the climate and environmental and First Nationsissues, while doubling down on the massive expansion of resource extraction projects. Their playbook involves paying off economically challenged elected First Nation bands and calling it reconciliation and consent. This is all done in the name of independence from the United States, while the benefits of massive fossil fuel exploitation go to American owned energy extraction corporations in Canada where the greatest subsidy to these companies, besides tax breaks and other incentives from the public purse, is the environmental degradation to the air, land, and water that Canadians are left to deal with. 

Meanwhile, PM Carney committed Canada to increased military spending from $40 billion a year to $150 billion a year, purchasing 75% of its arms from the U.S., in support of wars in the Middle East and Eastern Europe and elsewhere. No increases to services for Canadian people, but unlimited borrowing of billions of dollars to fund increased militarism, the single biggest Co2 emitters on the planet. Canadians voted for a Carney government that would push back against American threats and economic dominance, and instead got the governing policies of reactionary Conservative Pierre Poilievre. More corporate subsidy of American owned industries in Canada, more money for NATO warmongering, more climate and environmental degradation, and more running roughshod over First Nations objections using RCMP repression.

There is a food and housing crisis for millions of people in this country, and these economic and military alliances are only making things worse for everyone except the wealthy. These are the real threats to us all, and not the manufactured fears about the rise of economic rivals in Russia and China. The billionaire Epstein Class” owns the dominant political and economic institutions and corporate media of Western democracies, and their dystopian techno-feudal vision for our human community is what is driving the decline in the health and well being and prosperity of it, not Chinese or Russian bogeymen. Our government is promoting Ai data centres that gobble the electrical power and water of entire cities, while serving to eliminate human productivity and creativity. 

And who benefits? Most people, especially younger people, are highly sceptical of the false promises of an Ai Industrial Revolution” because they intuitively understand that the only people who will benefit are the tech-bros. the global venture capitalists, and the repressive governing and surveillance systems everywhere. Manufacturing fear through corporate media propaganda is used to coerce our consent for all of this, in an opportunistic strategy of mass deception. There is a simple answer to the question: how do we know governments are lying? Their lips are moving.

Shucking Oysters: The Deadening Effect of Wealth

Shucking Oysters: The Deadening Effect of Wealth

By Alex Allen

There are two groups of people who have to think about money all the time: the very poor and the very rich. On Hornby we see a lot of rich people. Some are lively, curious and engaged, but others display this “dullness in spirit.” There’s a sense that nothing is sufficiently stimulating to hold their attention, that they have lost their capacity for wonder. George Monbiot said we are all consenting to the “Earth-eating, soul-sucking mode of exploitation we call capitalism.” One day we too might live the “affectless life” of the ultra-rich.

What if most rich ass holes are made, not born? What if the cold-heartedness so often associated with the upper crust – known as the Rich Asshole Syndrome (RAS) – isn’t the result of “having been raised by a parade of resentful nannies, too many sailing lessons, or repeated caviar overdoses, but the compounded disappointment of being lucky but still feeling unfulfilled?” We’re told that those with the most toys win, that money represents points on the scoreboard of life. But what if that narrative is just another grift in which we’re all getting ripped off?

In his essay “Extreme Wealth is Bad for Everyone – Especially the Wealthy,” Michael Lewis noted, “It is beginning to seem that the problem isn’t that the kind of people who wind up on the pleasant side of inequality suffer from some moral disability that gives them a market edge. The problem is caused by the inequality itself: It triggers a chemical reaction in the privileged few. It tilts their brains. It causes them to be less likely to care about anyone but themselves or to experience the moral sentiments needed to be a decent citizen.”

Of course, there are exceptions. Plenty of wealthy people have the wisdom to navigate the difficult currents their good fortune generates without succumbing to RAS  – but such people are rare, and they tend to come from humble origins. Perhaps an understanding of the debilitating effects of wealth explains why some who have built large fortunes are vowing not to pass their wealth on to their children. Several billionaires, including Bill Gates and Warren Buffett have pledged to give away all or most of their money before they die. Buffet has famously said that he intends to leave his kids “enough to do anything, but not enough to do nothing.” 

Brooke Harrington, a professor at the Copenhagen Business School wrote that “when the wealthy are revealed to be drug addicts, philanderers, or work-shy, the response is – at most – a frisson of tabloid-level curiosity, followed by a collective shrug.” Behaviours indulged in the rich are not just condemned in the poor, but used as a justification to punish them, denying them access to resources that keep them alive, such as healthcare and social assistance. We are seeing this played out with utter cruelty in the US. 

In 2016 Jeff Bezos purchased two adjacent houses in Washington, DC for $23 million in cash. Bezos then hired an architect to oversee a $13 million renovation. One house for the family headquarters and the other for entertaining guests featuring a 1,500 square foot ballroom with floor to ceiling fluted columns. Shortly after this purchase, Bezos bought David Geffen’s Beverley Hills estate for $165 million (believed to be the highest ever paid for a home in California), where he now flies back and forth in his $66 million Gulfstream jet, when he is not schmoozing on his $500 million super yacht, Koru, the largest sailing yacht in the world. Anointed the fourth richest man on the Earth, Bezos’ net worth is estimated to be over $270 billion. Musk is number one at over $800 billion. 

The rich didn’t get rich by thinking a whole lot about others. Getting rich involves ignoring most people while you pursue wealth, and at worst, it involves screwing other people over. Either way, it’s naturally the more selfish among us who will pursue wealth. Nicer people, by nature, take most of their pleasure and satisfaction in life through interacting with others. They have love in their lives and are thus less likely to need to pursue wealth despite the cost of doing so. 

In the Atlantic this month, Noah Hawley touched on how billionaires have conveniently left the world of consequences. “They float in a sensory-deprivation tank the size of the planet, in which their actions are only ever judged by themselves.” Being truly rich doesn’t just mean amassing enough money to afford super yachts, private jets, or a million acres of land. It means everything becomes free, and if everything is free and nothing matters, “then the world and other people exist only to be acted upon, if they are acknowledged at all.” Empathy is gone. Elon Musk once called empathy “the fundamental weakness of Western civilization.” If empathy is the problem, then lack of it isn’t a deficiency – it’s an advantage.

The world has always been run by rich men. Hawley writes that although today’s billionaires are clearly manipulating society to maximize their own profit, something else is also happening – a “disassociation from the reality of cause and effect, from meaning and history.” These men no longer feel the need to change the world in order to succeed, because their success is guaranteed, no matter what happens to the rest of us. 

As Linda McQuaig and Neil Brooks wrote in The Trouble With Billionaires: “Today’s gigantic fortunes seem to be less a reflection of the innovative genius of current billionaires and more a reflection of how uniquely adept they’ve been at elbowing their way to the front of the trough.”

The Pseudopod Reflects on Toxic Positiviy

(*Satire)

The Pseudopod Reflects on Toxic Positivity  By Cylon2036 We/Us

Toxic positivity is the last remaining pillar holding civilization together. Without it, society would immediately collapse into a horrifying abyss where people acknowledge obvious problems, express sincere emotions, and perhaps even ask difficult questions. Thankfully, this catastrophe has been narrowly avoided by an army of motivational influencers armed with social media Bulletin Boards declaring Good Vibes Only” with a soundtrack of positivity word salads.

Critics claim toxic positivity suppresses authentic emotional expression.” Exactly, and that is its greatest strength. Imagine the chaos if every human being were allowed to honestly articulate despair, frustration, alienation, grief, or exhaustion. Organizational meetings alone would become unbearable. Instead of Chad, Chairperson of your group opening the quarterly budget review with, Looks like were all stretched to the breaking point by impossible demands,” he wisely says, Were crushing it, team!” while his left eye twitches violently from caffeine induced cardiac instability. This is leadership.

Modern toxic positivity teaches us that every calamity is secretly an opportunity. Lost your job? Exciting chance to pivot.” Crippling burnout? Your body is simply asking you to slow down.” Climate collapse? Think of all the beach property opening up from rises in sea level. The beauty of this philosophy is that it converts systemic failure into a personal growth journey. Entire industries now depend on this sacred transformation. If people ever realized their suffering might have structural causes instead of insufficient journaling habits, the self-help economy would implode overnight.

One must especially admire the corporate applications of toxic positivity. Nothing motivates underpaid workers like a mandatory resilience seminar delivered by a consultant billing $14,000 a day to explain the healing power of gratitude while employees ration groceries. Workers no longer need fair wages, housing, pensions, or reasonable schedules. They merely require a mindfulness app and a poster in the break room featuring a mountain with the words: Success Is a Journey.” The mountain, naturally, is shown with a billionaire helicoptering to the summit.

Educational institutions have also embraced this magnificent doctrine. Children are no longer permitted to feel negative feelings.” Instead, every child receives affirmation, celebration, and a commemorative ribbon for attendance. Why burden young minds with resilience when they can instead develop a catastrophic inability to process reality? The future belongs to adults who express only joy and an abundance mindset. 

Toxic positivity also performs an essential geopolitical function. It allows governments and media institutions to reassure citizens that everything is fundamentally fine at all times. Inflation? Strong economy. Endless war? Defending freedom. Mass surveillance? Personalized convenience. Housing crisis? Innovative minimalist living. Citizens are encouraged to remain optimistic and adaptable while quietly converting their garages into multigenerational housing units.

This optimism is mandatory because critical thinking is now treated as a moral failing. To express concern is negativity, and to identify contradictions is cynicism. To experience despair in response to objectively despair-inducing circumstances is simply poor branding. Modern society demands emotional obedience, and one must smile through layoffs, laugh through ecological collapse, and maintain a positive mindset while customer service chatbots deny insurance claims using animated thumbs-up emojis.

Naturally, social media perfected the art form. Entire platforms now function as digital cathedrals dedicated to performative wellness. Every influencer appears spiritually radiant despite clearly filming morning abundance rituals” at 4:30 a.m. through the dissociative haze of adrenal collapse. The average motivational video now resembles a hostage tape produced inside a candle store: You have the same 24 hours as Galen Weston.” Yes, and medieval peasants had the same 24 hours as feudal lords. Time, it turns out, is not the only variable.

Yet toxic positivity persists because it is astonishingly efficient. It converts anger into self-care routines, political dissatisfaction into gratitude exercises, and collective problems into private emotional failures. It is capitalisms emotional support animal. Why recreate society when you can simply repeat affirmations until your nervous system permanently detaches from observable reality?

In the end, toxic positivity represents humanitys final evolutionary stage, with the ability to smile sincerely while the room burns down around us. The truly enlightened citizen does not panic during catastrophe, they whisper, Everything happens for a reason,” moments before the ceiling collapses. And honestly, that kind of commitment to morale deserves our admiration..