Home Blog Page 94

Shucking Oysters: Shopping Cartels

I was in Nanaimo for a three-day conference last week. It was not the content of the conference that moved me when I was there, it was the content of the city. Downtown in every nook and cranny, wherever you looked, you saw the horrible effects of opioids and homelessness. Most, if not all, had that familiar contorted body, the “fentanyl fold.”

A guy bent over pushing a shopping cart full of random objects, screaming at no one in particular. Another yelling, aiming a guitar menacingly as if it was a rocket launcher at some unseen threat. Two bundled individuals, huddled on the pavement, awkwardly trying to feed each other spoons of ice cream. A young woman with sores on her face, sitting on the sidewalk, legs twitching, staring vacantly, dead eyed. How did we get here?

The following evening, I wandered around downtown trying to find a place to eat. The smell of urine permeated the air. Many places were closed or boarded up. Corner after corner, personal encampments at entrances to buildings, parking lots, and alleys. It was like a game of not-so hidden object. And then the ones who continually push their shopping carts throughout the night, searching for a place to feel safe and sound. Which, sadly, they may never find. 

Eventually, I found an Indian restaurant. It had a makeshift wood front door, with a sign warning us to open and close carefully. The daughter of the owner said the restaurant had been broken into a week earlier, and cash, a stereo and speakers were stolen. Regular break-ins and thefts are happening so often that more and more businesses are moving away or closing down. Nearby residents are having their cars and garages broken into. People don’t feel safe on the streets. 

According to StatsCan, Nanaimo was pegged as Canada’s sixth-worst municipality for crime. To date, the city has lost 68 residents to drug-related deaths, 5% of all opioid deaths in BC, despite being just 2% of its population. There are 76 emergency shelter beds for 600 known homeless individuals – a whopping 200% increase from 2016. 

With the imminent provincial election, it’s not surprising to hear Premier Eby announce in the middle of September, that they are working with Nanaimo to open a 60-bed navigation centre “to provide accommodation and supports for people experiencing long-term homelessness.” Just a few days later, the province also announced that Nanaimo would be getting one of six new Assertive Community Treatment teams, which will focus on “delivering community-based mental health services for people with serious challenges.”

In Vancouver, whack-a-mole mayor Ken Sim announced that he will be increasing visibility of officers to deal with the homelessness. Sim says more focused attention will be brought to the downtown Eastside using several “police resources and tactics.” He’s confident the added police presence will address chronic shoplifters and bring relief and security to the area. My spidey sense says not. Patrolling cops in armoured body wear and helmets will not provide comfort and joy. More like agitation and fear, which will further exacerbate already unbalanced, vulnerable human beings. 

This is an express lane to incarceration not streamlined access to humane treatment. Like every city in North America, we are divided on how to combat the fentanyl crisis. Some want the streets swept clean, others favour a more compassionate, health-based approach. Punishment and retribution versus compassion and hope. 

It is this population, those with severe addictions and mental health issues that often don’t receive the help they need from community support systems. Either the services don’t exist in an official capacity, are chronically underfunded, or in the words of downtown Eastside psychiatrist Dr. Bill MacEwan, the people themselves are viewed as “too difficult” or “too unsavoury” to deal with.

On the election campaign, both the provincial Conservatives and the NDP have voiced their full approval for the controversial involuntary care under the Mental Health Act. To address this, the government is creating more than 400 mental-health bed facilities “with more to come.” Meanwhile, Conservative Leader John Rustad accused Eby for being inconsistent and not acting on this issue sooner. 

Green Leader Sonia Furstenau accused Eby of following “John Rustad off every reactionary cliff” and said she was concerned about an over-reliance on involuntary care. “Where are the investments in prevention and addressing the root causes of what we’re seeing in our communities? There’s also no focus on long-term, community-based care after discharge,” she said.

Taking people off the streets and institutionalizing them against their will, is complicated, legally, morally and practically. We should be investing in better voluntary mental health support services which help maintain peoples’ dignity and rights. With drug addictions, there is little evidence that compulsory treatment is effective and some evidence that it could even be harmful. 

As one disillusioned healthcare worker said: “If the ultimate goal of forced treatment is reducing homelessness – and easing the moral heartbreak of witnessing ill people sleeping on the street or using drugs in the open – then lawmakers are writing the wrong prescription.” 

Cowboy Corner: A Visit to the Doctor

I finally had to succumb to the pain in my shoulder. It just became unbearable. I tried all these home remedies and nothing worked. At first I figured I strained it by lifting something really heavy. Then I thought that maybe I had some sort of repetitive motion disorder brought upon by several years of something I have no recollection of doing. So I decided to go to a Doctor to figure out the problem. I walked into her Office and the first thing she said was, “Hello! And what seems to be the trouble today?”. So I briefly explained my symptoms and then she interrupted and said, “Well, first of all, you’ve got an arrow sticking out of you. How long have you been walking around like this? It’s a miracle that you’re alive”. Then I looked down and realized she was right. So I gave her twelve dollars because that was all the money I had on me at the time and went home and drank which I will readily admit was quite a bit more beer than I should have and then had a smoke or two and decided the logical course of action was to pull the offending projectile out with a pair of vice grips. It worked, but I would not recommend this procedure at all. However, if you do, you will need to take a 12 or 16 gauge shotgun shell, insert a knife into the top portion between the folded edges, carefully bend the flaps back, empty out the pellets, then pry out the paper wad below with the same knife, then pour the gunpowder into the wound, and light. This procedure will cauterize the area and decrease the likelihood of infection. Oh, and don’t attempt this near an open jug of kerosene. I learned that the hard way.

Letter to BC Ferries Commissioner Hage

September 27, 2024
To: Commissioner Hage, info@bcferrycommission.ca
cc < Minister.MOTI@gov.bc.ca , < Engagement@bcferries.com ,
< Josie.Osbourne@leg.bc.ca >, < karen@hiceec.org >, < sborthwick@islandstrust.bc.ca >
< leciastewart@bcferryauthority.com >, < nicolas.jimenez@bcferries.com ,
< tdpinfo@bcferries.com >,
<terry.farrell@comoxvalleyrecord.com>,media@taxpayer.com
Subject: B.C. Ferries Uses Trump’s Deny, Deny, Deny Playbook to Avoid
Accountability

Dear Commissioner Hage:
Directing BC Ferries recently to strengthen its deteriorating relationship with ferry
dependent communities by making us feel respected, heard and valued is long over-
due. Denman and Hornby islanders, however, do not trust BCF’s response that they
value this feedback as BCF has dismissed our collective feedback about the unreliability
of the Baynes Sound Connector cable ferry for over eight years.
Despite expert industry criticism that a cable ferry could not do the job, ousted CEO
Collins replaced a perfectly reliable vessel with a perfectly unreliable cable ferry. Since
the beginning of the vessel’s sorry lifeline, the following list of BCF actions confirm a
pattern of denying negative feedback that is incompatible with a mandated collaborative
decision-making policy:

Ignoring Feelings and Experiences:

  • Dismissing our collective anguish, anger, and despair due to depending on an unreliable
    vessel every day for eight years.
  • Dismissing our collective fears for our school children and other vulnerable islanders
    who need lodging and food when stranded overnight.
  • Dismissing our collective outrage when important appointments are missed or when
    ailing islanders cannot get to the hospital in time for care.
  • Dismissing our collective economic anxiety concerning service providers doubling and
    tripling transportation costs due to ferry insecurity.

Dismissing our collective anxiety and expenses when organizing lodging the night
before flights or other important commitments because we cannot trust the ferry will be on schedule the next day.

Engaging in Deceitful Practices:

  • Using a survey of islanders’ positive responses to the summer tandem service to
    support keeping the cable ferry in service.
  • Underreporting service interruptions in annual performance reports.
  • Continuing to claim, without evidence, that the cable ferry has exceeded corporate expectations in saving tax dollars and providing service on a par with its predecessor.
  • Engaging in questionable record-keeping of the ferry’s operating expenses that have triggered an appeal to the Auditor General to conduct an investigation.
  • Gaslighting after media exposure of lengthy cancellations that the complications are resolved and that service is improving.
  • Continuing to promote a mandated community engagement policy despite evidence that BCF has yet to move beyond the gathering and reporting feedback stage to reach a collaborative solution.

Engaging in Irrational Decisions:

  • Failing to factor in expert industry advice when considering the cable ferry in 2013 or
    create a contingency plan should the experiment fail.
  • Ignoring evidence of trial failures that are redacted in a full page of the shipbuilder’s
    promotional literature.
  • Designating $l7M in the current budget cycle to stretch a vessel that remains
    handicapped by unresolved mechanical issues and service unreliability.

Considering stretching the vessel despite evidence that heavier cables and a heavier
engine would reduce the vessel’s current kayaking speed even more.

The above actions are predictable symptoms of corporate hubris or arrogance when a
CEO goes out on a limb to make a promise that cannot be delivered. In studies of
corporate hubris, these actions inevitably lead to corporate failure. In order to avoid this
outcome, new CEOs are advised to right the wrongs of their predecessors by firing
executives who frequently, as in the case of BCF, appear to remain loyal to past
leadership and by returning to essential service.

A return to essential service for Denman and Hornby islanders demands
replacing an unreliable vessel with one that exceeds OUR expectations. Only
then will we feel respected, heard, and valued and begin to trust BCF. Since
islanders do not expect BCF to change course, I am appealing once again to you to
follow your mandate to balance the needs of ALL stakeholders by guiding BCF to end
an eight year long charade that creates profound suffering for islanders.

Respectfully,
Sharon Small,
Denman Island Resident

Letter to the Editor – Perri Gorarra

                                Caitlin Johnstone: An Alternate View.         

                Caitlin Johnstone is a fully crowdfunded journalist who answers to no one and can speak her truth as she sees it…. Just as we can do in our beloved Grapevine. Her goals;

               “To do every little thing  I can do to help save the world. Humanity seems to be hurtling toward extinction by way of climate destruction or nuclear annihilation, both of which are movements held in place by a transnational alliance of plutocrats and secret government agencies. This unelected power establishment, (which is sometimes referred to as the Deep State…) seems to be motivated not by any ideology, nor any loyalty to any particular nation, but by sheer hunger for limitless power. I place emphasis on the United States because that’s where the largest amount of power appears to be centralized.”

                I will continue with one more quote from Caitlin:

                “It isn’t the West versus Russia.

                 It isn’t Left versus Right.

                 At this time, the real conflict in our societies is a few ruling elites and their cronies versus humanity’s natural impulse to act in a way that is beneficial to humanity.

                All we need  to do is to help that Impulse to flourish, get out of our oligarchy imposed brain boxes, and build a new world.”

                These quotes clearly demonstrate to me why Caitlin and her partner, Tim Foley’s work merits a place in our Islands Grapevine. We are living in a time when the behaviour and the goals of the Elite are coming into view, slowly but surely. Hopefully, our “brain boxes” will continue to discard the programming that we have all been subjected to and help us to create a much healthier, holistic world in the near future.

Carpe Diem and Peace and Love as us old hippies say.

                 Perri Gorrara

First Time God

Otto of the beach

CORRECTION!!

It seems someone was asleep at the controls and didn’t update the Crossword’s ‘DOWN’ clues in this week’s (Sept.26th) issue. Not quite clueless given last week’s clues have joined this week’s puzzle. One of those ‘no cigar’ moments.

HERE are the correct clues for this week’s crossword, with apologies for the inconvenience:

     Down
1. Chem. rooms
2. Barn neighbor
3. Descend
4. Pert
5. A lot of land
6. Barn dweller’s query
7. A Crosby
8. Actress Bancroft
9. Classroom sound
11. Group of fish
12. Gave hands
13. Burnt tree
14. Tribute
21. Batter ingredient
23. Fraternity characters
25. Catchall site
26. Housing unit
27. Clan emblem
28. Daffy
29. Nordic rugs
30. Balaam’s ride
31. Big vessel
32. Arrest
33. Carpentry or printing
35. Out of play
38. Caravansary
41. Falsely ingratiating
43. Partner of to
44. In recession
46. Ace, when not eleven
47. Peptic problem
49. Like some breath
50. Courted a ticket
51. Type of organic compound
52. Bagel or bialy
53. Far Eastern money
54. Deliver from peril
56. Diamond Head island
57. Dad’s day gifts
58. Helm position
61. Allow

How Much is a Frog Worth?

pastedGraphic.png

Beaufort Watershed Stewards

HOW MUCH IS A FROG WORTH?

The little Northern Red-Legged frog that plopped into the water as we approached Hart Creek for our weekly water sampling was certainly a valuable addition to our morning. Growing up on the edges of suburbia my days were often spent catching frogs and snakes and interesting bugs. But now I rarely see a frog. This day was richer for having seen our amphibious friend, but I could never attach a dollar amount to that brief encounter.

We all believe that nature has value. But we’re referring to a philosophical value, not the kind of value that an accountant can enter into a spreadsheet. But there is a growing movement among urban planners and city managers to do just that: to put a dollar value

on certain aspects of nature and then enter that value into a spreadsheet. This approach, referred to as Natural Asset Management, was pioneered by the Town of Gibsons on B.C.’s Sunshine Coast and treats certain aspects of the natural world as capital assets. According to the Gibsons website their municipal asset management policy:

Explicitly defines and recognizes natural assets as an asset class 

but more importantly 

Creates specific obligations to operate, maintain and replace natural assets alongside traditional capital assets. These obligations include having well-defined natural asset management strategies in place, as well asthe financial resources to maintain them.

There is a good, local example of these ideas just a few kilometres to the south of us. In 2017, the City of Nanaimo, together with the Municipal Natural Assets Initiative (MNAI), began a study of the Buttertubs Marsh Conservation Area, an area of reclaimed wetland. The wetland had been restored to provide the public with recreational and educational opportunities, but as a side benefit the marsh also provided the Millstone River with flood protection, giving excess water somewhere to go other than the streets of Nanaimo. They estimated the costs of replacing that flood protection with engineered stormwater management ponds. What they found was that it would cost almost $5 million dollars to build equivalent protection to what the wetland was already providing. This doesn’t include the cost of purchasing land on which to build the ponds. If the effects of climate change were considered, the costs jumped as high as $8 million dollars. 

As a thought experiment we might apply these ideas to the value of our local aquifer. What would it cost to replace it? We might start by imagining each household installing cisterns for storing rainwater. If cisterns ran dry too soon, we might imagine adding in the cost of buying truckloads of water. Providing water for firefighting might involve large community storage tanks and associated infrastructure. Even without actually putting numbers to these ideas it should be quite clear that our aquifer is a very valuable financial asset. I’m sure our friend, the Northern Red-Legged frog would agree that it’s worth protecting.

Mike Mesford

Director.tech@beaufortwater.org

250.702.5900

Is the Lone Soldier the Lone Ranger?

Everyone of my generation knows of the Lone Ranger. He was a really good guy, always coming to the rescue of poor settlers in trouble – brave, strong, principled, only fighting “bad guys”. His mysterious nature, with his white hat, black face mask and self-containment only added to the allure. In actuality the Lone Ranger was never alone, always accompanied by the resourceful but definitely subservient indigenous “Tonto”, who always addressed him as “Kemosabe”. A Mexican friend of mine, well-versed in the ways of settler-colonialism and white male dominance, said that what Tonto was really calling the Lone Ranger, in the subversive way of those so dominated, was “Quien no sabe” – he who does not know. To us children unaware of the necessary script of settler-colonialism, the Lone Ranger was always a hero, and he always came out on top.

Now what about the “Lone Soldier”? How many of you, dear Readers, have heard of him/her/them? This is the name given to those who go from other countries, non-Israelis, to fight in the Israeli army. As Heather Reisman, owner of Indigo, sympathetically describes them, these are soldiers “without families in Israel”. We would do well to learn more about them however, because we give them enormous support every year through our tax system. Every person who pays taxes to the Canadian government supports “lone soldiers”, with money that incentivizes young people to go to Israel and join the military, by providing numerous benefits such as a university education upon their return. In fact, it is very likely that we taxpayers have supported Reisman’s “lone soldiers” project to the tune of about $180 million in the last 20 years.

Here’s how it works: Billionaires Heather Reisman and her husband, Gerry Schwartz, establish a foundation called Heseg Foundation for Lone Soliders, and contribute large sums of money to that foundation every year, for which they get a significant tax receipt. Because they are in such a high income bracket, a much larger percentage of their donations gets written off by CRA than the average person’s charitable donation, as much as 80-90% in their case. This means that for the approximately $200 million they have “donated” to Heseg since 2005, only about

$20 million is their own money. They get back the rest of that money in charitable tax receipts. (Yves Engler, 3 September, 2024)

Here is another mystery. How do they get away with this, given that it is illegal under Canadian tax law to give money to a foreign military? Hmmmm. It seems to me Reisman & Schwartz ought to be able to do whatever they want with their excess money, but why should the rest of us be subsidizing their illegal choices?

Now that Jewish National Fund and the Ne’eman Foundation have lost their charitable status with CRA, we may see CRA responding to complaints about such brazen misuse of our taxpayer money by revoking the charitable status of Heseg Foundation. A formal complaint has been filed by Just Peace Advocates and it is likely that more attention will be given such complaints with public input to CRA by the average taxpayer.

Max Blumberg is a charity law expert in Canada. He says there are a thousand “Jewish charities” in Canada, and Yves Engler, who has been investigating the charitable status of Zionist organizations like the Jewish National Fund for the last 15 years, says it is safe to assume that while many have little to do with Israel, most of those charities have an Israel element. “According to Blumberg, the 1,000 registered “Jewish charities” have a whopping $12 billion in assets. Supposed to donate, not accumulate assets, these groups must be raising two to three billion dollars a year. Just how much of the money supporting Israel are all Canadians covering?” (Engler, 3 September, 2024)

Jewish Currents has a wonderful comic/graphic essay by Solomon Brager, their director of community engagement (When Settler Becomes Native, JD Brager, 2021), which they have republished in this week’s edition (newsletter@jewishcurrents.org. 23 September,2024). It is really worth viewing! In examining the Jewish claims of indigeneity in Israel, the idea is that Jews share common ancestry with the historical inhabitants of Israel and therefore have a claim to exclusive sovereignty over the land of Israel. These claims have the effect of positioning Israel as a de-colonial movement, despite the fact that early Zionist leaders, such as Theodor Herzl, known as “the father of Zionism”, openly recognized that theirs was a colonial enterprise. Brager quotes Herzl’s 1899 address to the first Zionist Federation conference in London: “The Zionist idea, which is a colonizing plan, should be easily and quickly grasped in England.” And indeed it was. Brager’s comic-form essay helps explain the allure Israel may have for many a young Jewish Canadian “lone soldier” in search of a meaningful identity in a secular and divided world. Saying that all Jews are indigenous to Israel ignites a saviour reflex and alleviates the guilt of displacing and killing Palestinians who’ve been continuously resident on the land and are, by all modern understandings of indigeneity, truly the indigenous people of that area.

So, as young idealists travel to Israel lone ranger style, to ride into the fray and dispel the bad guys (the “terrorists”), we Canadians call them “Lone Soldiers” and share complicity in their violence against the Palestinians through our taxpayer subsidies. This is something we can actually refuse to support. The lines are open to CRA.

Letter to the Editor – Bruce Holden

Thank you Grapevine for giving us all the information you do. Caitlin Johnstone is a very brave woman and she is doing us a service. I hope she doesn’t stop or get stopped. People who don’t want to know what she has to say don’t need to read it.

I look forward to each Grapevine to read Sally Campbell’s informed offerings, Maxine Rogers gardening and food information, as well as Alex Allen’s writings. I know we’ve gone through some divisive times and people are afraid to speak their minds.

Eartha Muirhead’s article was very good too. Thank you for hanging in there Grapevine.

Bruce Holden