https://printartphotography.ca
Free Shack Future?
Free Shack Future?
Shane Nelson.
At Flagstone’s submission deadline (Friday 19 Sept), I was announcing the closing of the Free Shack on 30 Sept, and removal of all donations. As you read this, we should know how that played out.
If you aren’t familiar with the Free Shack, it was in the smallish plastic garden shed at the driveway to Elkhaven at 2325 Northwest Road. As Elkhaven’s resident caretaker, I opened the Shack as a reuse / repurpose way for islanders to share stuff, when COVID had forced closure of the Free Store at the Old School.
Elkhaven was sold effective July 1st, and my contract was was ended by the new owners from Sept 30th. That ís when I move out.
I hope by now that fans of the the Shack are on the way to finding a new place and new structure. And looking at the whole concept. For sure, our community has shown it’s needed. It ís a huge financial benefit to the community. For donors, easy downsizing. For re-users / re-purposers, free used goods. For both, the 24/7/365 access and outside location have made it very easy to use. The financial benefit is surely growing, as prices rise due to Trumpanomics. There ís also the ‘Sale Day’ thrill of wondering what you might find on each visit.
I’ve never seen the Shack as mine and would love to hand it off (maybe that’s already happened). On average I spent many hours a week on managing it. Also, I did a weekly trip to Courtenay. Sometimes took the Free Store’s surplus too. Gave unwanted good stuff to thrift stores (sometimes I brought back their stuff). Some weeks, I also visited Cumberland dump with stuff that was clearly not usable, or could not be recycled here, or was just plain old, bagged household trash (summer visitors were guilty every year).
Some of this work will surely be needed in a new version, and I’ve been urging fans to share ideas on how it could be continued. Though I don’t have the energy or skill to manage the discussion process.
If you haven’t already, see Facebook’s bulletin board for the community discussion – maybe write letters to the papers?
If you used the Shack even rarely, you would know the problems with that space. It was only just OK for a rack of clothing, 2 – 3 shelf units with books / DVD’s, kitchen stuff / small household gear, etc. Stuff was always overflowing on the floor and outside. The bigger pieces (furniture etc.) got damaged by rain. It needs a much bigger space ñ covered ñ plus backup storage. Has anyone stepped up yet to offer a new location? Maybe someone could do some fundraising / grant writing for new buildings etc?
Could it be staffed by volunteers? Although the 24/7 access is a big plus, making it lockable might prevent the problems of trash dumping and the town trips for disposal. We could look at Hornby’s recycle centre / free store for ideas.
A new place would need backup storage at least as big as a garage ñ like we had at Elkhaven. Ideally this would be located very near the open shelves. User traffic needs proper off-street parking so that the bottleneck at the old Shack doesn’t create the same traffic hazard. This happened who-knows-how-often on the bend where Elkhaven driveway is located.
I’ve found a new place to live, thanks. Thanks, too, for the help in moving the donated stuff, wherever it landed – my temporary storage, the Free Store, Recycling, or Cumberland dump.
We’ve been doing something awesome here! And thanks for practising RRR. It helps reduce climate change too.
Dinner with Ruth Kirwin
Hello Denman Island!
Do you know Ruth Toussaint Kirwin is inviting you to dinner?
Every two weeks Ruth is going to put on a delicious dinner, by donation, at the Back Hall with the next one being on Sept.30th at 4:00. And you can contribute by helping her to afford the care of many Haitian refugee children in her other home of the Dominican Republic.
This has been a tough year down there, with the children losing their right to education and medical care because they lack citizenship. But together we can finance the legal process for them to become citizens, one child at a time.
Then there will come the need to, as you can see from the photo, to get them their school uniforms. Yes, kids still wear uniforms to school in the Dominican Republic!


So please remember you’re invited to dinner on Sept.30th at 4:00. Ruth can be reached at 250-650-2553. (Perhaps one of you has expertise in fund raising and would like to help Ruth with this big responsibility. Help of any kind would be greatly appreciated.)
Fall 2025 Updates to Tribune Bay Park
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Updates to the Tribune Bay Park Recreation Enhancements Project
Campground construction, picnic shelter replacement, and next steps
HORNBY ISLAND, BC – DATE, 2025 – PROJECT UPDATE – FALL 2025
As another busy summer at Tribune Bay Park comes to a close, preparations for next season are already in the works. There are two phases planned for improving recreation at Tribune Bay:
PHASE 1: Enhancing the existing campground
Phase 1 will focus on improving the current campground within its existing footprint. Construction is scheduled to begin immediately after the campground closes for the season on October 1, 2025. Details regarding upgrades to campsites, amenities, and the overall visitor experience were released in Spring 2025.
What to expect during the Phase 1 construction period
A construction contract has been awarded, and work will begin on October 1, 2025 with the installation of construction fencing, equipment, and temporary office facilities. Phase 1 is scheduled to be completed by May 2026. New traffic advisory signs will be installed along Shields Road and access will remain open during construction but there may be some limited delays from time to time. Access to the campground will be closed during the construction period.
Impacts to ferry capacity will be minimized by transporting materials by barge to Shingle Spit Terminal when required throughout the project. As needed, marine landings may occur several times a week, and an excavator will offload aggregates directly from the barge into waiting dump trucks, ensuring efficient handling. Work hours will be based on the tides but managed to minimize disturbance for the community as much as possible. The boat launch will remain open during barging activities.
Environmental considerations
A Construction Environmental Management Plan, prepared by a Registered Professional Biologist, will be approved by BC Parks before construction begins. This includes
measures to mitigate impacts at the material offloading site and in the construction area. Some of these measures include inter-tidal shoreline protection, erosion sediment control, tree protection, and noise controls to mitigate impact on bald eagle habitats.
Trees may be removed at the campground if they are found to pose a danger to workers or the public. All recommendations will be reviewed by BC Parks prior to removal and trees will be retained wherever possible. BC Parks has decided to withdraw campsite 41 and 42 from the current design to protect a mature Pacific crab apple grove.
There will be over 5,000 new plants installed on this site including native shrubs, sedges, and trees. These plantings will help to improve biodiversity, privacy between sites, and stormwater management.
Picnic shelter replacement
The existing picnic shelter has been assessed by an engineer and determined to be near the end of its life. A new picnic shelter will be constructed on the existing footprint in the day-use area with construction expected to start October 2025 and be completed before Spring. Park users can expect some limited closures of the beach trail and the Outdoor Education Centre, as construction will be staged from this site. Picnic shelter materials may be brought in and out by helicopter and barge in Tribune Bay. Construction staging may also occur in the day-use parking lot.
PHASE 2: Planning and engagement for remaining campsites
The existing campground will see a temporary reduction in campsites during Phase 1. These campsites will be built in a different area of the park to ensure there is enough space to provide the experience people expect in our campgrounds. The location for the remaining campsites is currently being explored.
More information regarding plans for Phase 2 and opportunities for engagement will be provided soon. Planning for Phase 2 will continue in Spring 2026 with the goal of beginning construction in Fall 2026.
For project updates and additional details visit: helpshapebc.gov.bc.ca/tribune
Public Displays of Disaffection
Public Displays of Disaffection By Keith Porteous
I didn’t agree with Charlie Kirk’s words and ideas, but I can take no pleasure in a conservative politician being murdered in front of his wife and children. There are those who are publicly celebrating this political assassination, which is their right, but what does it say about their own character? In printing Kirk’s obituary, the centrist New York Times had to publish a “correction”, retracting an attribution to an offensive statement that Kirk didn’t make. In-his-obituary! Another centrist publication, The Nation magazine has made the same mistake, in falsely crediting Kirk for positions he didn’t take. All of this undermines the cause of the grassroots Left.
My objections to Kirk’s ideological position is his Christian conservatism, where he used non-secular rationalizations to justify his positions on women’s reproductive rights and gay marriage. Contrary to false accusations made on the internet, Kirk did not support many of the kinds of discrimination he was accused of, however, he did vociferously oppose affirmative action and he objected to the right to gender affirming medically assisted transitions prior to legal adult status. He was a major supporter of the deplorable Donald Trump, and everyone has the right to despise Charlie Kirk and his offending views. Publicly celebrating the murder of any person is exercising your right to be an assh*le, and it can only serve one purpose. I can’t think of a more twisted and self serving public display of disaffected “virtue.”
Charlie Kirk espoused the corrupt and tired tropes of “free market” and “moral” conservatism. Many of the most vocal centrist liberals (who falsely identify as Leftists), have never really examined Charlie Kirk and his views closely, and instead rely on a meme generating echo-chamber to label him a “fascist.” This follows the pattern of centrist liberals calling anyone they disagree with a fascist, or a bigot, and they often smear the character of their ideological adversaries instead of debating them on the merits of their ideas, or lack thereof. It should not be that difficult to do so. Objectionable conservative ideas have been around for a very long time. Political assassination is not a successful tactic in advancing the cause of civil rights for all.
By weakly ignoring their own principles, calling everyone they disagree with a fascist, centrists dilute the actual meaning of the word fascist. Centrist liberal hyperbole is red meat for conservative populists, and it feeds their well financed movements. Ironically, in the emotional expressions of their objection to conservative populism that advocates for “small government/strong borders” and economic nationalism, the centrists advocate for policies that are increasingly authoritarian, believing they can fight fiery reactionary speech with fiery calls for censorship, lawfare, and wait for it……that same economic nationalism. I consider Charlie Kirk to be a passive aggressive and retrograde conservative assh*le; but I don’t celebrate any person’s murder.
Go ahead and express yourselves, but be careful that you don’t take on the low vibrational mindset of those you claim to oppose. Or am I a day late and a dollar short?
Shucking Oysters: The Joke’s On Us
Shucking Oysters: The Joke’s On Us
By Alex Allen
We Canadians, perhaps more than anything else, are known for our comedy. Or more to the point, our comedic talents. We are masters of homegrown self-deprecation. Rob Salem wrote that our national identity, if we even have one, could be said to be low self-esteem, or at the very least chronic insecurity. Common wisdom has it that our sense of humour is “borne out of the inherent isolation of our large and under-populated country.” That and possibly, the weather. “The prevailing image is of small groups of fur-wrapped Canucks, huddled together in some remote snowed-in hunting lodge, cracking wise and laughing their bums off in an effort to keep them warm.”
Martin Short. Mike Myers. Seth Rogen. Eugene Levy. David Eby. David Eby? Someone once quipped, those Canadians who are truly funny tend to run for the United States; those who are truly unfunny tend to run for office. With British Columbia facing a record $11.6-billion deficit – which is no laughing matter – Premier Eby is now trying to defend a controversial speech-writing contract he has with friend and comedian, Charles Demers.
Conservative opposition finance critic Peter Milobar revealed that the writing contract is a $165 an hour gig, with an initial two-year agreement up to $150,000, and two yearly extension options up to $450,000. Milobar rightly questioned why Eby can’t use one of the many communications writers already employed. There are nine writers in the premier’s correspondence branch, six in his communications office and five in the writing and strategy unit – not to mention the dozens more employed by the government’s communications division. And not one has a sense of humour?
Eby defended the contract, saying he has many speeches to deliver a day and that Demers (who wrote for previous NDP leaders Mike Horgan and Adrian Dix) has not billed to his maximum entitlement. “We do use contractors, because it allows us to reduce costs sometimes. And in this case, $14,000 for a speech writer is not quite as sensational as the headline the Conservatives are using.” BC Legislature reporter Rob Shaw noted however, that Eby’s numbers are misleading, as before the contract was even renewed in February, Demers had already been paid over $95,000.
As Jordan Foisy poetically wrote about Stephen Harper, Eby has also worked diligently to be “as bland and boring as an Alberta prairie, that a joke about him can drift by in the wind like a tumbleweed.” Has Demers actually made Premier Eby funny? I searched high and low for any semblance of humour in his speeches. Far from being the other “bland, gray-washed nerd with dead eyes” Eby is just not quotable. There’s nothing sensational about him.
When politicians tell jokes, some kill at the podium and others kill at any chance of ever being elected. There are rules to political joke making. First, the obvious, be self-deprecating. Second, singe, don’t burn. Burns do occur and lines get crossed. Which brings us to the third rule: use jokes as damage control. And finally rule number four, delivery matters. The best political comedy speeches are “a mix of punchlines, extended riffs, and set pieces.”
Writing jokes for politicians is different from writing for a late-night talk show. “For a politician, it’s not just about getting laughs,” says Eric Schnure, a speechwriter who has written for both Democrats and Republicans. “It’s about being liked.” Some humour is off limits, particularly impersonations and joking about loss of life. A caveat that unfortunately, Jimmy Kimmel and others forgot to heed.
David Eby needs all the help he can get it. According to a recent Angus Reid poll, Eby’s approval rating at 41% has fallen to its lowest since he took office, leaving him tied for the second-least popular Canadian premier. Only Quebec’s François Legault fares worse. Legault’s approval dropped to 22%, while Ontario Premier Doug Ford is tied with Eby at 41% (up from 38%). Manitoba’s Wab Kinew leads all premiers with a 61% approval, followed by Saskatchewan’s Scott Moe at 50% and Alberta’s Danielle Smith at 46%.
As Reid Small explained, Eby’s decline reflects more than routine mid-term fatigue. “Economic strain, labour unrest, a decaying healthcare system, questionable spending, and unmet housing promises have left his government confronting mounting public distrust.”
Beyond the immediate labour and economic issues, several questionable policies have added to the sense of strain and need for humour. Eby very questionably committed more than $27 million to operate trade offices across Asia, fuelling concerns about the perceived value-for-money. Nine years after declaring a public health emergency over toxic drugs, the death toll is over tens of thousands and nothing has changed.
Even though every word they utter is tainted with suspicion, we want our politicians to be authentic or at least to have the appearance of authenticity. In response to Trump’s tariffs, Eby implored us to hold off on our trips to the US and to stop buying American products. When questioned about Blackstone, a hugely unethical trillion-dollar American investment company with close ties to Donald Trump, and now a partner in the Nisga’a project, Western LNG terminal, Eby replied with nuanced irony: “If you want to invest in BC, you want to build here, you want to create jobs here, we welcome you.”
Political comedy speech rule number one, David: self-deprecation. Perhaps you could start by joking about your height, but then again, the joke might go over our heads.
The Lantern’s Puzzle
Gabriel Jeroschewitz, September 12th, 2025. I was inspired by The Lighthouse, a film I saw a few years ago, and occasionally, I still dream about it.
The Lantern’s Puzzle
(A Tragic Fable of Two Men, an Unforgiving Sea, and a Light They Couldn’t Stop Worshiping)
I must begin by stating, dear listener, that I was never meant to be upon that cursed rock, nor to watch the two men unravel beneath the glare of the great lamp. I was only meant to bring provisions — barrels of salted fish, sacks of coal, and bottles of gin disguised as medicine. Yet storms anchor more than ships, and the sea, in its wet and wheezing humour, left me stranded, an unwilling chronicler of madness.
The island was a claw of stone rising from an endless bruise of water. The lighthouse — a pale tower with a cataract eye — presided like a god grown weary of its flock, watching, ever watching. The gulls screamed their obscene sermons. The foghorn moaned endlessly, like some beast in rut stretched over eternity. And in this place of sound and fury, there were two men.
Thomas Wake, the elder — a crusty stump of a mariner whose beard smelled of smoked herring and pipe ash, and whose backside was a bellows of impolite winds. He bellowed too, in the dialect of sea gospels: half scripture, half profanity. And Ephraim Winslow, the younger — lean, sullen, full of secrets, eyes like windows cracked by storms. A man who worked hard, though always with the look of one digging his own grave.
At first, their routine had a grim humour. Wake ordered; Winslow obeyed. Wake drank; Winslow sulked. Wake’s farts rattled the dishes; Winslow scrubbed them anyway, jaw clenched tight enough to crack teeth. For days, it was a vaudeville act of maritime misery. I laughed — quietly, of course, as gulls are spiteful gossips and I did not wish my chuckles carried to the ears of their human subjects.
But the weather worsened. The supply boat never came. Gin became breakfast, lunch, and supper. The lantern above — how Wake guarded it! He climbed nightly to commune with its glow, moaning, sighing, whispering, as though into a lover’s ear. Winslow was forbidden entry. That exclusion burned him hotter than any storm.
Isolation eats different men in different ways. Wake grew mythic in his braggadocio: Neptune’s bastard, captain of captains, self-declared prophet of sea law. Winslow, meanwhile, began to argue with shadows. He beat a gull to death with a fury that shocked me — though the gulls had been tormenting him for weeks, cackling, shitting on his freshly scrubbed stones, shrieking that he didn’t belong. Perhaps he believed killing one would silence them all. (It didn’t. The gulls only grew louder, as did his nightmares.)
Meals became theatre. Wake crunched, offering sea tales with the solemn reverence of scripture. Winslow, jaw tight, shovelled in mouthfuls of gruel, as though eating were an act of defiance. Then came the night Winslow insulted Wake’s cooking. I swear on salt and storm that the older man’s eyes bulged like a squid hauled too quickly from the deep. He erupted into a tirade, defending his slop as though it were haute cuisine blessed by Poseidon himself. I nearly drowned in suppressed laughter — yet beneath the comedy rolled something darker, like undertow.
The storm grew monstrous. No departure. No hope. Their ration barrels emptied, yet their bottle pile multiplied. If laughter was my first refuge, silence was now my armour. The two men began dancing — lurching, sweating reels across the sodden floor, clinging to each other as though love and violence were the same embrace. At other times, they fought — fists, curses, furniture thrown. The lines between play and murder blurred like the horizon in fog.
And then, there was the light. That damned, divine, unholy light. Winslow begged to see it. Wake refused with the zeal of a jealous priest. I more than once caught Winslow staring up the spiral stairs, breathing as though the lamp pulsed like a heart. Nights passed when Wake stayed in the lantern room too long, making sounds no prayer book dares record. Winslow’s face twisted with hunger — for understanding, possession, perhaps communion with whatever lived within that glow.
Winslow climbed the stairs one evening — or morning; time had lost all meaning. Wake followed, roaring curses, tripping in his drunken scramble. I crept behind, compelled though terrified, and watched.
Winslow reached the lantern first. The great eye opened, casting him in brilliance, a living figure in some cruel myth. His mouth opened in laughter, ecstasy, horror — I could not tell which, for all were the same. Wake pulled at him, screeching that the light was his alone. They grappled, bodies twisting like lovers at war. And then, the inevitable: a fall, a crack of bone, a silence that seemed to swallow the sea itself.
Wake lay broken on the stairwell. Winslow wheezed, trembling, his face glowing with the residue of whatever truth or lie the light had offered. And then he laughed. Oh, the laughter! Not of joy, but of a man who had finally understood the punchline of a joke no sane soul should hear. It echoed in the tower, cracked and booming as thunder.
When I fled — yes, escaped-for sanity is a ship that must cast off before it sinks, he was still laughing as though the ocean had whispered something obscene and divine into his ear.
* * *
Years later, I sometimes hear echoes when taverns grow quiet and winter presses in. A gull’s laugh rings too sharp, or a foghorn groans too long. I remember the two men — their grotesque dance, drunken embraces, furious sermons on soup and scrubbing—a comedy, but the kind that curdles into tragedy before the final act.
And the light, ever the light. I sometimes dream of it — a great, burning eye that sees me, that waits. I wake in sweat, chuckling without knowing why.
For the sea is a jester, cruel and eternal. And men, ah, men are merely its fools — trapped on their own rocks, quarrelling, drinking, farting, fighting, until one day they, too, stumble into the lantern’s glow and find the joke waiting for them.










