An Update from Spectra Health
Spectra Health
Physiotherapy Traditional Chinese Medicine
Osteopathy
An Update from Spectra Health:
Spectra Health has been serving Denman and Hornby Island for 4 years now! Though I have met many of you in person, many may not know much about how Spectra Health came to be. This is, of course, the abridged version.
Spectra Health began as Denman Island Physiotherapy over 10 years ago now. I had graduated with a Masters in Physical Therapy from UBC and before that, completed a Doctorate of Traditional Chinese Medicine at Pacific Rim College. At the time I was doing home physiotherapy by referral from the physicians (practicing at the Denman Island medical clinic), for clients unable to travel off island for therapy. However my full time employment was in Parksville, in a bustling clinic. Gradually Denman Island Physiotherapy grew to a full day of practice in a shared space at the medical clinic, while still commuting for work the rest of the week.
In 2021 it was finally time to give my full attention to the Islands. I wanted the same level of reliable and quality care local residents were having to travel hours to receive. Travel that often defeated the purpose of the trip in the first place, especially when travel would exacerbate a person’s pain. It would also allow me to build from scratch an integrated and interdisciplinary practice, something I had dreamed of since 2003 when I began studying in the medical field.
I chose the name Spectra because it is the plural of Spectrum. To me it denotes the multitudes of tones by which we can approach health and wellness as a practitioner as well as tuning to the wide array of ways a clients’ nervous systems, physical/emotional/spiritual being-ness may present at any given time. I was thrilled to be able to collaborate with the Denman Medical Board to lease a designated physical therapy space at the medical clinic. And on Hornby Island, the Hornby Denman Health Care Society had worked tirelessly to have an allocated wellness space that I was able to rent as well. This allowed me to purchase the necessary equipment, and fill both rooms with all the medical and top of the line rehabilitation devices one would expect when travelling to town for care. Small but mighty spaces.
Quality and reliability of care has been the corner stone on which I have built Spectra Health, and what I keep coming back to as the practice grows. My goal also included bringing on-board other practitioners, to work together cohesively, to provide more seamless care but also making it easier for you, as a client, to seek out care from one common source with peace of mind. As a care provider, I find myself incredibly fortunate to be able to work so closely with not only other therapists on my team but also across the islands and with the physicians as well. This is an alliance I treasure, and is not as common as you may think in the medical system at large.
Spectra Health has continued to evolve since it’s inception as I brought on more practitioners. Rebecca offers Osteopathy once per month. She travels from her successful practice in Cumberland, to offer her services from the Denman Island location. Hornby patients are welcome to book of course (at least it’s one less ferry, and we do hope to offer these services on Hornby Island as the demand grows). Rebecca has a background as a professional dancer and over 20 years experience in movement education including Gyrotonic and Gyrokinesis methods. After completing her 5 year training with the Canadian School of Osteopathy in Vancouver, Rebecca has focused her practice not only on chronic pain, vascular and immune conditions but also has gained extensive training in perinatal and paediatric health. The profound yet gentle approach Rebecca has is perfectly suited to help young babies and children feel at ease during their assessment and treatment.
In 2024 Christopher Mainella, an excellent Physiotherapist who had practiced on Denman and Hornby a few years ago, moved back to Denman Island and I asked him to join Spectra Health. This would allow more diversity of care fitting with the “spectrum” theme of Spectra Health.
Christopher’s broad skill set also now includes IMS (inter-muscular stimulation) and dry needling. IMS involves inserting needles into specific muscle points, better known as trigger points, to elicit a local twitch response that helps decrease pain, improve muscle function, and promote healing. Christopher studied Physiotherapy at McGill University and graduated in 2007. He has since furthered his studies in myofascial release, acupressure, joint mobilisations, fall prevention, cranio-sacral therapy and much more.
Having a team of therapists means that Spectra’s doors are open 4 days per week on Denman Island and 2 days per week on Hornby.
With Spectra Health taking flight, I was able to qualify the practice for the voucher program through Vancouver Island Health Authority in 2025. This has allowed patients undergoing knee and hip total joint replacement to receive their allocated post-op rehabilitation with either myself or Christopher, while having the cost covered by VIHA. Spectra was one of the first 3 clinics enrolled as the program finally arrived to the Comox Valley.
2026 is just around the corner, there are still many goals and projects in the works. The official kettlebell classes haven’t yet begun though I am doing one on one kettlebell training with a physio twist at the clinic. Stay tuned to the Spectra Health blog page on the website for educational, health related postings.
It is such an honour and pleasure to be of service to these two beautiful communities. If you’d like to learn more about myself, Rebecca or Christopher feel free to visit the “About Us” section of the website: www.spectrahealth.net or email me directly: carmen@spectrahealth.net
I’m happy to answer any questions you may have or take on any suggestions you may have for your rehabilitation/wellness care.
Sincerely,
Carmen B-Gautrais, Registered Physiotherapist, Registered TCM Practitioner (Acupuncturist, Herbalist), Owner/Founder of Spectra Health
Current schedule:
Christopher Mainella : Denman Tuesdays –Hornby Thursdays Rebecca Halls: Denman 1 Friday per month
Carmen B-Gautrais: Denman Monday, Thursday, Friday –Hornby Tuesdays
Phoenix Riting! – November 27th, 2025
Since my article came out last week, I’ve had many responses, most in enthusiastic agreement. The day after I submitted it, the contractor posted an in-depth explanation of what they’re doing there, and why. I read it with interest, but nothing changed my mind, and much sent a chill through my bones. He describes the campground as a “structure” and defends removing large trees to make way for the “underground infrastructure” that needs to go in.
And my head spins. Structure? Infrastructure? It’s a campground. People go camping for a break from technology, for immersion in the natural world. At most, a good campground should offer a place to shower, outhouses, a few taps for water, and a handful of sites with hookups. The old campground had all that. It could have been upgraded without this rip-it-out-and-rebuild-it approach.
Oh, wait. That is so last millennium of me. These are modern times. None of that hippie nonsense, claiming nature is alive, or that trees are ancient beings who communicate through channels we’re only beginning to observe, or that we should preserve what we promised to protect.
Campgrounds have been rebranded. Now, operators are expected to provide a fully serviced structure offering maximum convenience, where visitors can park their mansions-on-wheels close to shopping and the beach. Every site will, I’m sure, be wired, watered, and wifi’d.
Who needs nature? If we break it, we’ll fix it. Right? Nature is just stuff, arranged randomly, and humans are super smart. And anything we can’t figure out, we’ll invent an AI to figure out for us. Problem solved. But can throwing more technology on the problem fix a problem caused by overuse of technology?
In The Overstory by Richard Powers, a character asks, “What do you need to do to make a healthy forest?” The answer: “Nothing.” Less is more when it comes to managing nature. Balance re-establishes itself without intervention. Look at what happened when wolves returned to Yellowstone. Remember how quickly nature restored itself when everything went still during the Covid lockdowns. Blue skies over Beijing. Wild animals roaming urban centres. Nature is waiting for us to wake up.
I was taught “nature is smarter than people.” That was our family religion, since we were otherwise atheists.
For a sharp contrast, look at the Arts Centre. It’s a beautiful example of working with nature with minimal impact. I love that they left so many big trees, especially that one big tree in the parking lot you have to drive around. I love that they’re replanting with indigenous ground cover that doesn’t need watering. I love that they’ve worked every step with Elder Barb White of the Comox First Nation. The first peoples understood nature and respected its ways. I’m not saying we should live as they did. But we could take a page from their book and scale down, slow down, be gentler, show some respect.
I’ll address a few arguments I’ve heard. First: no, it’s not the same as when someone logs their private land. I may object, but I don’t get a say. Nobody bulldozes their entire lot, covers it with gravel, and rebuilds from scratch. That would be silly, and ought to be illegal. But the campground is provincial property. It belongs to us as much as to anyone. In fairness, they ought to defer to the overall island aesthetic and the Islands Trust ‘preserve and protect’ mandate. It’s disrespectful to bulldoze their way in without any clue of context or culture.

In practical terms, many will miss those big shade trees over the parking lot in summer. Hoo boy, that campground is going to be hot and dusty. All that gravel for drainage, combined with removing the old trees, guarantees drier conditions than usual. Why do they need drainage? Oh, it gets muddy in winter? So what? No one uses a campground in winter. With the big old trees, it was nicely shaded and dampish even in summer.
Some say, give it time, it will look beautiful in the end. But that evades the point. How it looks, now or someday, is only a small part of the issue. It’s about the ecological integrity of our island, this limited and fragile ecosystem.
Those big trees were here long before we were. Their roots met underground; they conveyed messages; they sequestered carbon, released oxygen; they monitored their environment, they helped each other stay healthy, they provided habitat for myriad species. New plantings are less resilient, cut off from their histories.
Trees are a community. They cooperate, they communicate with trees farther away. This has been demonstrated again and again. And yet the same people who say “trust the science” go deaf and blind when new science shows that what we’re doing is wrong: unworkable and ultimately destructive.
Those trees were old. No new plantings can replace them, not in our lifetimes. Trees matter, and they’re being removed from the face of the earth at a blinding pace.
We have an opportunity here to do better. We’ve prided ourselves on being a model, in our small way, with our pioneering recycling program, our nature-friendly architecture, our thatched roofs. We have worked hard to do minimal harm, develop sustainable methods, act with care and awareness of consequences. Granted, that has been changing. The Thatch condos, for example, steepened the already-slippery slope.
Are we really going to roll over and embrace the modern monoculture of greed and convenience that’s eating the world? Are we all so tired and dispirited? Or is that just me?
So very tired, y’all.
That’s what I think. What do you think? Email me at phoenixonhornby@gmail.com
All-Seeing Bliss: Full-Spectrum Drone Surveillance

*Satire*
All-Seeing Bliss: Full-Spectrum Drone Surveillance
By Thomas P. Hunterson,
Chairman and CEO of Newcor Strategic Observations Group™️
In these uncertain times, when porch pirates roam free, raccoons behave with open impunity, and neighbours have the audacity to mind their own business there is only one logical solution: full-spectrum drone surveillance blanketing every inch of our beloved communities. Some naysayers may mutter words like “privacy,” “civil liberties,” or “I’d prefer not to be filmed showering,” but these concerns quickly dissolve when compared to the unparalleled glory of a sky buzzing with benevolent robotic observers.
Imagine stepping outside your front door and feeling the gentle whirl of rotor blades above; the modern equivalent of a guardian angel, only louder, shinier, and equipped with thermal imaging, and the comfort of constant aerial companionship. It’s incredibly reassuring to know that no matter where you go, a drone is hovering nearby, documenting your every move in case you ever want to relive the magic of your visit to the recycling centre.
For centuries, humanity has suffered from the oppressive burden of not knowing what everyone else is doing every second of the day. But fear not: with full-spectrum surveillance there is an end to all mystery, while gossip becomes obsolete. Why speculate about your neighbour’s romantic life, when you can view a 4K aerial replay? Why wonder which dog is off-leash and leaving unwanted “presents”, when you can call up a heat-signature track and file a detailed report? At last, the dream of total transparency, especially other people’s, can be fully realized.
Drones bring people together in ways previously believed impossible, boosting community engagement whether you want it or not. Suddenly, parent-teacher meetings are more lively when parents review flight logs to determine who exactly let their kid leave a bicycle in the ditch by the ferry. Bridge Parties are no longer plagued by awkward dancing and instead, residents enjoy spirited debates over whose backyard trampoline generated the most suspicious movements at 3 a.m. Nothing fosters togetherness like mutually assured visibility.
Gone are the dark ages where homeowners lived in blissful ignorance of their yard’s imperfections. Full spectrum surveillance harkens a new golden age for lawn care. With drones capturing every brown patch, weed, and slightly crooked garden gnome, citizens have been elevated to peak horticultural enlightenment. Neighbourhood standards rise, competitive edging becomes the sport of the summer, and front yards everywhere achieve an immaculate, surveillance-optimized sheen.
What better time than early childhood to teach kids this important life lesson, that privacy is a quaint relic from the past? Thanks to drones hovering lovingly over playgrounds, children adapt quickly to performing for an invisible aerial audience. They grow up confident, self-aware, and perfectly prepared for adulthood in which every job interview, commute, nap, and dental cleaning is monitored for quality assurance.
Sure, some critics claim that full-spectrum drone surveillance represents a “dystopian overreach,” or a “nightmare scenario,” or “literally the opening montage of every cautionary sci-fi film ever made.” But these cynics overlook the profound joy of living in a community where nothing escapes the warm, unblinking gaze of tireless mechanical helpers.
After all, what is freedom compared to the soothing certainty that someone, somewhere, somehow, is watching you at all times? Because if safety is good, then omnipresent aerial monitoring must be great. And in this brave new world of beautifully buzzing skies, we can all sleep soundly knowing that even our dreams might be recorded for an even brighter, buzzier, future review.
Shucking Oysters: Trumpettes
Shucking Oysters: Trumpettes
By Alex Allen
“Horse face.” “Fat.” “Ugly.” A “dog who has the face of a pig.” And “piggy.” These are just a few terms of endearment Trump has said to various women over the last year. Attacking women’s looks, mocking their bodily functions or comparing them to animals is his repertoire. Which is all rather odd, considering Trump has appointed more women to Cabinet-level positions than any other Republican president. The “new model of right-wing” womanhood – far-far right and blood thirsty.
In 2012, Trump attacked Cher, over her criticism of Republican candidates, saying that she should “stop with the bad plastic surgery and nasty statements.” In the same year, Trump dismissed Bette Midler as “an extremely unattractive woman.” In a 2015 interview he said, “Heidi Klum. Sadly, she’s no longer a 10.” And yet, for a man who is so obsessed about looks, the women in his inner circle are not exactly Vogue material. All have identical plastic faces. Prolapsed lips, filler cheeks and foreheads, jaw contouring, coupled with heavy makeup, spray tans, fake eyelashes, thick eyebrows, and dark smoky eyes. It’s the Mar-a-Lago look. Which makes perfect sense considering the meaning of Mar is to ruin or diminish the perfection or wholeness of.
As Guardian writer Arwa Mahdawi wrote: “Among women the look is characterized by huge lips that look as if they could suck up a small child whole, frozen facial expressions, and cheeks so bulbous you could hide a gerbil underneath them. Men also have the slick frozen faces, but instead of bigger lips they’re pairing them with bigger jaws.” Also known as the “Republican look,” their clothes, whether casual or corporate, are always form-fitting and often accessorized with big gold Christian crosses. The women are always thin and almost always white.
Mahdawi adds that these are not human faces, they are “luxury meat-masks meant to signal wealth and in-group belonging.” AI-generated caricatures that live in such weird little bubbles that everyone is addicted to filler. No more hiding your secrets, it’s about flaunting them – a sort of conspicuous consumption of cosmetic surgery.
DC plastic surgeon Anita Kulkarni has been turning down an influx of political insiders asking for “a more done look, like that Mar-a-Lago face.” And not because of a huge waiting list, but because adding extra fillers and injections on top of already treated faces, can be dangerous, she warned. It’s a situation Kulkarni calls “filler blindness.” If you add more and more product to your face and are surrounded by people who do the same, “you lose sight of anatomic normalcy.”
“It’s a mistake to dismiss this as just about fashion, just about makeup,” said Juliet Williams, a professor of gender studies at UCLA. “It’s actually absolutely central because this Trump MAGA movement was able to return to the White House in 2024, I believe, essentially because of leveraging the gender war.” Williams added: “I look at these MAGA women and I don’t see them as fashion victims…I see it as war paint.”
It’s about signalling your exclusive membership in Trump World. As Mahdawi wrote, when surgery is embraced for the purpose of political conformity, consciously or otherwise, the inner circle will just be “a steady stream of fembots, indistinguishable and dulled.”
Achieving Mar-a-Lago Face isn’t easy. According to DC plastic surgeon, Dr. Jeffrey Lisiecki, the amount of work required depends on how much a person has aged and their natural features. To obtain the signature look, most people need a whole suite of procedures. And this is only the beginning.
Achieving Mar-a-Lago Face isn’t cheap: $15,000USD for a brow lift, $30,000 for a face lift and neck lift, $12,500 for an eyelid lift, $20,000 for a nose job, and $10,000 for a fat transfer to the face. To complete the look, women will pay thousands more on Botox, fillers, neuromodulators, microneedling, facials, peels, laser treatments and medical-grade skin care products.
And like a relationship, without regular maintenance, the Mar-a-Lago Face starts to disappear very quickly. Maintenance includes more Botox injections and laser treatments to maintain the skin’s buffed appearance. The bee-sting lips and puffy cheeks will require regular fill-ups and more surgery will be needed to tighten up the aging loose skin.
Dr. Faryan Jalalabadi, a Beverly Hills plastic surgeon, uses the term “frozen face,” which is caused by filler obstructing the muscles, resulting in less expression. Studies have found that the ice princess look leads to a lack of ability to connect. “When you look at them and you’re trying to have a heart-to-heart conversation, it’s hard not to get distracted,” Jalalabadi notes. “You have a hard time connecting with this person because they can’t move their face.”
It’s no secret that when we get old our faces not only lose a bit of volume, they kind of sag and the only way to lift with volume is to overfill. And that’s where we see these overfilled high-cheek-boned, puffy-looking faces, “bordering on non-human looks, because what happens is people keep going back for little maintenance touch-ups.” Eventually, they can only get the surgeon who prefers money over cosmetics. The result? Jalalabadi warns they can “easily end up getting the Joker smile, where your lips are over-pulled horizontally, or windswept eyes because the skin wasn’t set in the proper direction.”
One of the women most frequently cited as embodying the MAGA face is Homeland Security Secretary and ICE Princess, Kristi Noem. “The long-hair extensions, the big lips, the big cheeks, the makeup, the lash extensions, it’s like she’s doing drag,” said Daniel Belkin, a dermatologist in New York. Megyn Kelly called out Noem for “cosplaying” an ICE agent on a police raid while wearing “25 pounds of hair, only to be outdone by her 30 pounds of makeup and false eyelashes.”
This is the real brutality of the Mar-a-Lago aesthetic. Like their boss, they have a vile streak all their own. Kaleigh Werner wrote in the Independent, “it’s not the makeup or potential plastic surgery, but the eagerness with which its adherents capitulate to the whims of their king. American politics, like our faces, may never recover.”
Saints in Cheap Rooms
Gabriel Jeroschewitz, October 29th 2025, inspired and dedicated to Jean Genet
A tragically comic tone inspired by Jean Genet’s life and sensibility—but it is not a biography. It’s a fictionalized, imaginative tribute, blending history, invention, and irony.
Saints in Cheap Rooms
I met Jean one night in Paris, which no longer exists—though, of course, it never existed except in his imagination and the stains on the floorboards of Montmartre. By then, I was older than he ever intended to become; he, meanwhile, had slipped into legend and was bored by it. “It’s exhausting,” he told me, “to be admired by the right people. I always preferred being adored by the wrong ones.”
He looked disappointingly alive: blue veins under the wrist, nicotine patch on his arm, a slight heretic’s smile. The room was small, yellow, and smelled of vinegar and fear. “They call this a boutique hotel now,” he said. “Once it was a brothel. I can still hear the heels.”
I had been sent by a magazine that believed nostalgia could be monetized to write a piece titled The Last Saint of the Streets. My editor wanted tragedy, perhaps with a whiff of redemption. Jean preferred jokes. “Tragedy is just comedy with a good tailor,” he said, plucking at his shirt. “But you can’t afford either, can you?”
In the beginning, he told me, there was no mother, only paperwork. He was a child of the Republic, property of the state, and had a signature on a form that had lost ink. “They gave me foster parents who loved God more than food. So I stole food. Later, I stole God.”
He laughed—not kindly, but the way an acrobat laughs after surviving a fall. “You can tell a lot about a man by what he steals first.”
At twelve, he was caught taking apples. At thirteen, kisses. By sixteen, he had graduated to identities. He would try on names like other boys on jackets: Jean the Porter, Jean the Pickpocket, Jean the Poet. Only one fit properly, and it was the one he fashioned himself—the Genet who would bloom in the gutters.
“I enjoyed reform school,” he said, as if describing a spa. “Such an efficient place to meet your future readers.”
The files described him as incorrigible. He considered that a compliment, which, in the language of bureaucrats, it was not.
Years later, he began writing in another cell—not out of hope but spite. “You know how others keep diaries to confess?” he told me. “I kept mine to brag.”
He scrawled on brown paper, on the backs of arrest warrants, sometimes on the skin of lovers who slept too long. When the guards burned his first manuscript, he only smiled. “They were my first critics,” he said. “And like all critics, they improved the work by destroying it.”
He spoke of that period as one might talk of a monastic retreat. The other inmates thought he was drafting appeals; he was inventing saints. “All my saints were thieves,” he said. “Because they understood transubstantiation: turning sin into meaning.”
I asked whether he believed in God. “Of course,” he said. “How else could I rebel?”
Jean had a talent for making violence ornamental. He could describe a brawl as tenderly as others describe a wedding. “Prison was my first theatre,” he said, “and the wardens were generous producers. They even provided costumes—uniforms, chains, everything in matching grey.”
He adored men who were bad for him. “It’s not masochism,” he protested. “It’s aesthetics. Villains have better posture.”
Once, he fell in love with a murderer named Maurice, who wept only when shaving. Jean kept his tears in a bottle and later sold them as holy water to a painter from Montparnasse. “They were counterfeit tears, of course,” he said. But then, what isn’t?”
Their affair ended, like most of his affairs, in an arrest and an epitaph written in lipstick. Yet he remembered Maurice with laughter, describing how they used to gamble cigarettes over hymns. “He had such a voice for blasphemy. You could almost believe he meant it.”Fame arrived while he was still pretending not to want it. One morning, two gentlemen of letters appeared at his cell: Cocteau, wearing a silk scarf, and Sartre, wearing an opinion.
Cocteau called him a poet; Sartre called him a phenomenon. Jean called them “clients” and asked if they wanted receipts.
They campaigned for his release. The President signed a pardon. “They say I was freed by literature,” he told me, “but it was paperwork again. Always paperwork.”
Out of prison, he wandered Paris like a ghost who had overslept the apocalypse. Sartre invited him to salons, where people discussed existentialism and ate small sandwiches. Jean pocketed the sandwiches. “If you can’t live up to your reputation,” he said, “you might as well snack.”
Sartre later wrote a seven-hundred-page book about him. Jean never read it. “I already know the ending,” he claimed. “I remain misunderstood—but beautifully so.”In middle age, he grew political, though he insisted it was just another form of erotica. “I love the scent of danger,” he said. “It’s cheaper than perfume.”
He travelled to America and befriended the Black Panthers. “They greeted me as a comrade. I greeted them as a tourist of oppression.” He grinned to show he knew the irony. “At least they had better posture than the French revolutionaries—practice with rifles, you see.”
Later, he supported the Palestinians, scribbling essays that were half love letters, half manifestos. “The world thinks I choose sides,” he said. “But really, I just choose the beautiful losers.”
He claimed solidarity was the purest form of desire. “To march beside someone is to fall slightly in love with their stride.”
In this, he was consistent: the same hunger that made him steal wallets now made him steal injustices. Whatever belonged to others, he adopted—then returned, slightly more tragic and slightly more comic, as art.
“Being respectable,” he informed me over cheap wine, “is a contagion spread by furniture.”
He refused armchairs and preferred the floor. “Chairs make one complacent, and complacency kills poetry faster than vice.”
Publishers begged him to tone down his work. “They wanted homosexuals who behaved like diplomats,” he said. “I gave them saints who behaved like thieves.”
When television producers proposed an interview, he demanded to appear in drag as the Virgin Mary. They declined. “Another missed miracle,” he sighed.
He liked to walk through respectable neighbourhoods to lower the property values by association. “Every culture needs its scarecrow,” he told me. “I volunteer.”
At this point, dear reader, I must confess my role. I had come to chronicle the legend, not to become part of it. Yet Jean, like quicksand, pulled everything into his orbit—pity, curiosity, even journalistic detachment.
He insisted I accompany him to a dinner thrown by admirers from the university. The evening dissolved into arguments about whether art should liberate or provoke. Jean said it should be embarrassing. “If a book doesn’t make you afraid to hand it to your mother, why bother?”
Midway through dessert, he pickpocketed the dean’s watch, then presented it as a gift to the waitress. “A redistribution of time,” he called it.
That incident cost me my column but gained me this story.
Old age suited him like rust suits iron—it gave him character while threatening to destroy him. He lived in hotel rooms that smelled of damp lace and burned coffee. “Each day,” he said, “I throw out one more illusion. Soon I shall be pure absence.”
He wrote slowly now, his sentences looping like prayer beads. Sometimes he forgot the plot but never the style. “Plot is for readers with errands,” he said. “Style is for those with faith.”
Visitors came hoping for wisdom. He gave them sarcasm; it lasted longer. To a student who asked how to live authentically, he replied, “Stop trying to look authentic. Die anonymous, and they’ll build you a museum.”
His laughter had shrunk to a cough. But when he laughed, the walls still vibrated, as if amused by his persistence.
One winter morning, he decided to die in a hotel he couldn’t afford. “Death should always be an act of theft,” he said. “I’m stealing a few more hours.”
I found him half‑asleep, murmuring to the ceiling. “Tell the concierge,” he whispered, “not to change the sheets. They are holy relics now.”
He refused hospitals—too clean, too sincere. “If I must be purified,” he said, “let it be by dust.”
He asked me to fetch a mirror. “So I can watch myself disappear,” he explained. When I returned, he was already gone, leaving only the mirror fogged with what might have been breath—or irony.
The manager billed me for the room. “He always leaves someone the check,” she said.
The funeral was sparsely attended: a handful of literary critics, two ex-lovers, and one confused tourist who thought it was a performance piece.
The priest hesitated over the eulogy, uncertain whether to emphasize repentance or rebellion. Ultimately, he settled for silence, which Jean would have considered an excellent review.
Afterward, at the café, we debated his legacy. Some called him a prophet of liberation; others, a pervert with a pen. I said he was a comedian who never told the same joke twice.
A critic shook his head. “There’s nothing funny about Genet.”
“Exactly,” I said. “That’s why he’s hilarious.”Years later, I still see him—in the corner of every bar, mocking the respectable ghosts who pretend not to notice him.
Sometimes he stands behind me in the mirror, fixing my tie. “You’re growing tidy,” he warns. “Careful—that’s the first symptom.”
I tell him the world has changed, that his kind of scandal is now mainstream, that nobody goes to prison for love anymore. He smiles. “Then go for something larger. There’s always another crime.”
He was never a hero, and he would have resented being one. Heroes end their stories; clowns keep performing under collapsing tents.
If tragedy is merely comedy that remembers its mortality, then Jean achieved both: he laughed himself into sainthood and sinned himself into laughter.
Coda
I keep his stolen watch on my desk. It runs backward, of course.
Sometimes I wind it, and the seconds tick in reverse—each moment returning to an earlier disgrace, each disgrace glowing a little brighter for being remembered.
I think that was his real miracle: not turning pain into art, but convincing us that pain was already art, if only we looked at it with the right amount of wickedness.
So here’s to the thief who stole redemption and pawned it for a story. Here’s to the saint of cheap rooms, who taught us that even degradation can have good comic timing.
And when my clock finally stops, I hope Jean applauds—from whatever infernal cabaret he haunts—before stealing it outright
Letter to the Editor – Stephen Hawkins
Denman Island High-Speed Internet: Time for Clarity, Transparency, and Accountability
by Stephen Hawkins
For more than four years, Denman Islanders have been told that high-speed fibre-optic internet is coming. In that time, millions of dollars in public funding have been committed, yet residents continue to face unclear timelines, shifting explanations, and limited transparency from CityWest
—the company contracted to bring world-class connectivity to our island.
It’s important to understand just how much public money is at stake. The current build-out is not a new initiative; it is a continuation of the earlier $5.6-million publicly funded project, which also included approximately $760,000 from the CVRD. That first phase was intended to complete the job—and didn’t. When it became clear that the project had come up short, it was Denman residents—who asked questions, pushed for answers, and drew attention to the unfinished work.
These community efforts helped bring about the most recent round of provincial funding, delivered through the Northern Development Initiative Trust on behalf of the Ministry of Citizens’ Services. That additional funding is now supporting CityWest’s renewed effort to finish the network.
Over the past year, I have been working alongside several other Denman residents to press for clarity. Together, we have approached elected officials, asked detailed questions, and sought reliable public updates. We have been grateful for the responsiveness of Director Daniel Arbour and the Ministry of Citizens’ Services, who have provided helpful information when able.
CityWest, however, continues to provide incomplete, vague, or evasive responses to key questions—questions about service coverage, outstanding gaps, completion timelines, and what still needs funding. If residents are to have confidence in the process, that must change.
Denman Islanders cannot advocate for what we don’t fully understand. And when millions in public dollars are being spent—our dollars—we deserve clear communication from the company delivering the service and from the public bodies funding it.
We need timely, accessible, public updates, ideally through community forums such as DIRA, so that all Islanders—not just a handful of people persistent enough to chase answers—can understand where things stand. Transparent information will make us better advocates for the final rounds of funding required to ensure every Denman Island household is served.
We all want this project to succeed. Fibre-optic connectivity is essential for modern work, education, health care, and economic security on Denman. But success requires openness. It requires accountability. And it requires the public to be treated as partners—not as an afterthought.
About the Author
Stephen Hawkins is a former media worker and current freelance video producer. A relatively new Denman Island resident, he has longstanding family ties to the island and has spent decades involved in labour and community advocacy.








