Home Blog Page 49

#1693

Registration for Summer Camp is Open

This year Denman Community Programs  is planning 7 weeks of summer camps! Everything from digital music making to weaving, chef camp, dance camp, and even soccer if there’s enough interest. Take a look here: dices.ca/current-programs/summer-camp for information and to register. Deadline to register is now July 1. Contact dices.communityprograms@gmail.com for more information

Save the Date! Snag Farm Housing Co-op Info Session: Sunday July 13, 2-5 PM

Save the Date!

Snag Farm Housing Co-op Info Session: Sunday July 13, 2-5 PM

As part of the Islands Trust / Denman Housing Action Plan, we at The Snag Farm are asking the Local Trust Committee to consider pre-zoning our 42 acre property at 5400 Northwest Road to allow a total of 10 one acre lots of economical, ecological “cluster housing.” The property would be owned by a not-for-profit housing co-op, which would take it off the market via provincial legislation – no one (including us) will ever be able to make a profit from the land.

Our goals are: (1) to bring more people into our off-grid, subsistence-based intentional community project (for more info please see thesnag.org); (2) to further restore a former gravel pit to a condition in which it can support a diversity of species, including human beings, via subsistence conservation; (3) in the short term, to help alleviate the housing crisis by providing an affordable option for safe, non-precarious housing (4) for the longer term, to contribute to community discussions that can open up innovative solutions to accommodating people of all income and wealth levels on Denman Island.

We understand that discussions around housing have often been fraught and difficult. Therefore we are holding a series of facilitated information/discussion events, to introduce people to our particular vision, talk about how it relates to general issues around housing on Denman, and tour the property.

The first of these sessions will be held at the Big Pond event space (see directions to D-Centre at <thesnag.org/contact>, from 2-5 PM on Sunday July 13th. There will be a presentation from 2-3 PM; facilitated discussion from 3-4; a tour / drinks and snacks from 4-5. (Please feel free to bring something to add to the table, and if you want to be sure to have a comfy chair, please bring that too.)

Further details on the proposal will be posted on our website at <thesnag.org/prezoning>, along with links to relevant documents and background information. You can send any questions or comments to <charredsnag@gmail.com>

We hope to see you there!

Denman Island Garden Society News

The Denman Island Garden Society is thinking ahead to the Fall Fair on August 31st, where we have responsibility for the Show What You Grow exhibit and contest.  We hope you, too, will think ahead about how you can help out and what produce or flowers you will submit to the exhibit.  This year we are adding a scarecrow contest!  Stay tuned in the coming weeks for information about the entry categories, requirements and how to enter.  

We are looking for more volunteers to help out with judging and other tasks on the day.  If you are able to help, please contact Shirley Ward at billandshirley.379@gmail.com or (250) 335-2480.  

Open letter to the local Islands Trustees

Open letter to the local Islands Trustees

Hello Sam and David,

  We are contacting you in the hope that more action can be taken to redirect, and strengthen policies and protocols to protect Denman Island’s natural environment. Currently, one area of special concern is the clear-cutting and subsequent ecological damage at 7000 Point Road. 

 

Many community members are calling for more proactive mandates to protect this island from further forest and habitat loss. A new advocacy group called The Friends of the Gulf Islands is pressuring the Islands Trust to implement stricter guardrails on development that impact the natural world. Private property owners across this Island, (and all the Gulf Islands) are “legally” clear cutting, and cutting trees on slopes close to sensitive riparian zones which eventually affect water tables, destroy essential wind and storm breaks, cause soil erosion, habitat loss and contribute to local climate instability. 

 

 We appreciate the energy and time that you give to your responsibilities as Trustees. With a strong committed community behind you, Denman Island can be an unflinching leader in environmental protection. We must act now to bring in stricter bylaws and regulations to protect forests and trees on private property, as well as send a clear message that Gulf Islands are not suitable venues for land speculators and developers

 

7000 Point Road is a case in point; 143 acres owned by a holding company, H.J.T. Agricultural Development Co. Ltd. We are told by people on site that more than half the trees have already been clear cut and the remaining are also on the chopping block. The soil has been reduced to sand and dust. A conversation with a contractor on site, in June of this year, revealed that they have no current plan for the many large slash piles leftover from the logging. Slash piles are a serious fire hazard, while burning them creates air pollution. 

Complaints from months ago to the Islands Trust about 7000 Point Road have not garnered a response. Eartha’s follow-up call to Warren Dingman, IT Bylaw officer, on Tuesday, July 8, revealed that a Bylaw officer did go to the site. The owner has been notified that they must hire a private surveyor to establish if any work has been done inside development permit areas. If so, a permit must be applied for. I was told that the Islands Trust has no mandate to levy fines if private property owners do not apply for or get a permit. How tempting will it be to bribe the surveyor and where is the incentive for anyone to follow the rules?

What might you be able to do to help expedite our concerns to the Islands Trust? What can you do to tighten up policy and infraction rules around deforestation, cutting forests on sloped lands and threats to riparian zones? We are reminding the Islands Trust and our local trustees to apply the precautionary principle and consider the cumulative effects of development on local ecosystems.

Yours truly,

Eartha Muirhead, Deborah MacColl, Wendy Boothroyd, Cheryl Hurlburt, Steve Carballeira, Stefanie Wall, Mandy Negin, Steve Christensen, Howard Stewart, Frank Frketich, Mary Jane Stewart, Tara Parkinson, Paul Weyer, Cynthia Minden, Michael Rapati. 

Note to readers: Any community members interested in signing this letter, let me know at <ejmuirhead4@gmail.com> and please join the next Islands Trust meeting on Tuesday, July 15, 10:00 am, at the Activity Centre.

Shucking Oysters: No Fixed Address

Shucking Oysters: No Fixed Address

By Alex Allen

Fun facts. Over 235,000 “known” individuals experience homelessness on any given night in Canada. Last year, there were over two million visits to food banks – the highest number in history. Meanwhile, the social consequences of our public policies have “metastasized.” Changes to health care, social assistance, as well as housing policy have all contributed to the rise in the number of people experiencing homelessness. Our new world order: poverty is not a priority. Profit is. 

Two Canadian political scientists, Alison Smith and Anna Kopec, argue that homelessness is fundamentally political, and the causes and solutions are all wrapped up tightly in our political system. While chronic, long-term homelessness is indeed a new problem of public policy, poverty, colonialism, and social exclusion have meant that people have lived in different forms of housing insecurity or inadequate housing for decades. 

Fifty years ago, Canada had a relatively robust social safety net. Governments at all levels provided supports in many areas, including housing, health care, education, and social assistance. However, that safety net began to erode significantly as governments gingerly assigned more responsibility to us individuals for our economic and social well-being. Why feed or house the poor when food banks and nonprofits will do it for them?

The idealist has given way to the pragmatist, Lawrence Scalan wrote. Much of that energy and activism that once went into political and economic reform has been diverted to nonprofit agencies. While the nonprofits and homeless shelters do their best to meet the needs of a growing and diversifying population of people without housing, some have suggested that the whole homeless system is broken. Former CEO of the Old Brewery Mission emergency shelter in Montreal, Matthew Pearce, wrote “Shelters allowed homelessness to become more than a difficult period in one’s life –  they allowed it to become normalized.” 

The response to this growing crisis has been largely uniform across Canadian cities: eviction through “sweeps” and raids. Last year, police dismantled an encampment in Vancouver, one in Toronto, and another in Edmonton. Similar evictions have occurred in Barrie, Halifax, Calgary, and Victoria. These evictions generally involve a heavy police presence, including riot police, which does not bode well for the sensitive or marginalized. Like the current welfare system, it is all so punitive.

Politicians ordering the eviction of encampments often describe the process as “restoring safety to parks and public spaces.” Marie-Josée Houle, Canada’s first Federal Housing Advocate, calls these actions a “violation of human rights.” Harini Sivalingam, Director of the Equality Program at the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, characterizes it as “criminalizing unhoused people living in encampments.”

“Eviction of encampments is not the solution,” Houle says. “Encampments exist because people have nowhere else to go. Evictions, especially forced evictions, create more insecurity. Even the threat of eviction has a massive impact on people, further worsening their mental health and living conditions.”

According to Sivalingam, this approach poses significant risks to civil liberties. “It is inhumane, unconstitutional, and a violation of people’s rights,” she says. “They are using the law to penalise people for not having a home, for simply trying to survive.”

Addressing homelessness requires more than funding – it demands political will, which is currently lacking across Canada’s political spectrum. But as policymakers ignore expert recommendations – far from the neighbourhoods where politicians order encampment sweeps, people on the streets will continually face a bitter reality.

Ron Rice, executive director of the Victoria Native Friendship Centre said, “It’s like trying to put out a forest fire and only paying attention to the tops of the trees. Telling someone, ‘You can’t be homeless here, go be homeless over there,’ is not a solution.”

We have all seen the sheer dystopia of downtown East Side Vancouver. Locally, Victoria’s Pandora Avenue has also become the poster child of chronic homelessness. And Nanaimo is not that far behind. Closer to home, Campbell River has tightened up the rules around encampments in the city; those experiencing homelessness must be on the move constantly during the day. Like most emergency shelters, if they are not packed up and out by 8 am (some places 7 am) they risk losing their belongings, which they have to haul around all day. Hence the proverbial shopping carts, which represent the last efforts of homeless people to have the ability to keep what little belongings they have. People pushing buggies and carts are doing so because, without them, they have nothing. 

Why is tackling poverty not a health priority? SFU psychology professor, Dr. Julian Somers, wrote, “There are no apparent winners in BC’s bleak, yet astonishingly costly, approach to addiction, homelessness, and community safety.” We need the courage to accept that our efforts to address these issues, have not been successful, and in some cases, may have been misguided. 

As a species we are truly stuck and as someone once said, there is really no escape from the institutional cages we’ve made for ourselves. Or as Somers wrote: “We can transform the challenges of Pandora Avenue with a combination of intelligence, humility, and the one thing that remained behind in Pandora’s Box – hope.” 

FROM KISS TO KISS.

 Inspired by the song playing in the background, ” Don’t Let the Sun Go Down on Me. By George Michael and Elton John,  dedicated to their mums.

FROM KISS TO KISS.

Arthur Pumble, a man of quiet habits and even quieter trousers, embarked upon his grand photographic project in the nascent twilight of his retirement. From the discreet vantage point of a rose bush or a conveniently placed bird feeder, one could observe that Arthur had always possessed a certain… gravity. Not in the scientific sense, but more like a small, unassuming black hole of cheer. His life, one might surmise, had begun to feel a tad sepia-toned, much like those old photographs he now inexplicably cherished. He mumbled often about “fading to black and white,” and how he was “growing tired, and time stood still before me,” a sentiment that usually preceded a sigh so profound it could deflate a bouncy castle. He seemed “frozen here on the ladder of my life,” endlessly polishing the same rung.

Then came the epiphany. It arrived not, as one might expect, in a flash of divine inspiration, but in a discarded literary magazine at the local dentist’s office. An article, dense and gloriously overwritten, on the multifaceted nature of The Kiss. Arthur, captivated by phrases like “irresistible, unbridled desire” and “first unforgettable brick,” decided then and there to create his own “Kiss Atlas.” He would capture every nuance, every meaning, every passionate, provocative, or preposterous pucker. His beloved wife, Mildred, whose affection for Arthur was a sturdy, sensible, and utterly unphotogenic thing built on forty years of shared silence and lukewarm tea, merely raised an eyebrow.

“Arthur,” she’d said, without looking up from her crossword, “the only kiss you’ve ever truly mastered is the one you blow at the television when the snooker’s on.”

The observer noted that Mildred’s love was indeed the kind that “doesn’t bring tears to your eyes,” primarily because it was too busy preventing them from forming in the first place through sheer, unyielding practicality.

Arthur, however, was undeterred. He purchased a second-hand camera with more dials than a space shuttle, and began his quest. He spoke of capturing “a real kissing atlas,” of “unhinging prejudices,” and of showing the world that “a kiss is never the same as another.” Mildred braced herself.

His first subjects were Mrs. Henderson, a woman whose primary personality trait seemed to be her prize-winning roses, and Mr. Grumbles, who resembled a disgruntled garden gnome. Having read about the “provocative, transgressive kiss between two people of faith,” Arthur decided to adapt this. He envisioned a dramatic, almost scandalous embrace defying the mundane.

“Right,” Arthur announced, waving his camera like a conductor’s baton, “Mrs. Henderson, Mr. Grumbles. I want raw emotion. Defiance! Think of it as a statement against—well, against all those red and green. garden gnomes!”

Mrs. Henderson, convinced this was some avant-garde horticultural project, leaned in cautiously. Mr. Grumbles, startled, instinctively flinched, resulting in a rather unfortunate headbutt. The ensuing picture, when developed, showed Mrs. Henderson with a startled grimace and Mr. Grumbles rubbing his forehead, both looking less “transgressive” and more “mildly concussed.” It was, in its way, a kiss that certainly “changed their way of life,” albeit briefly, in the middle of a rose patch.

Next, Arthur, having pondered Brezhnev and Honecker’s “socialist solidarity kiss,” decided to attempt a local version. His subjects were Barry and Kevin, rival pigeon fanciers who had bickered over nesting rights for decades.

“Visualize unity!” Arthur implored, attempting to usher their stiff, tweed-clad forms together. “A transport of solidarity! Show the world that even in the fiercely competitive world of pigeon racing, there can be… communion!”

Barry, smelling an opportunity to elbow Kevin subtly, leaned in with a mischievous glint. Kevin, expecting a whispered insult about his prized fantails, turned his head sharply. Arthur captured Barry’s lips, making firm, unyielding contact with Kevin’s earlobe. Kevin let out a startled squawk, remarkably pigeon-like. This “kiss” certainly didn’t “allow a fragment of your life to wander free.” It instead caused Kevin to spend the rest of the afternoon wandering the cul-de-sac muttering about “assault by an avian enthusiast.”

Arthur’s enthusiasm, however, seemed impervious to failure. The observer noted his growing weariness, his shoulders slumped slightly with each botched attempt, and a subtle darkening around his eyes—the subtle signs of “the sun going down on me.” He often muttered, “I can’t light no more of your darkness,” a line he had recently discovered in a song and applied liberally to his uncooperative subjects.

His grand finale, he declared, would be a recreation of the “very sensual… between two statues” kiss, but with living, breathing (and preferably compliant) human beings. He tried to convince Mildred to pose with him for a “Manhattan” inspired shot.

“Just like Woody Allen and Diane Keaton on Pier 17!” he’d enthused, clearing the living room furniture to create his urban pier. “Passion, Mildred! The desire for exclusivity that leads two human beings to estrange themselves from the context that surrounds them!”

Wearing her sensible housecoat, Mildred looked at the makeshift “pier” (two overturned ironing boards) and then at Arthur, attempting to achieve a smouldering gaze by squinting.

“Arthur,” she said, her voice flat, “the most exclusive thing about us is our shared subscription to Amateur Gardening Weekly.” Grudgingly, she agreed to stand on an ironing board.

Arthur tried to direct her. “See me once and see how I feel!” he urged, quoting a line from his favourite new song. “Don’t discard me just because you think I mean you harm!”

Mildred sighed, then leaned forward. Arthur, aiming for the perfect angle, fumbled with the focus, tripping over a discarded gardening magazine. He stumbled into Mildred, who, to regain balance, instinctively pushed him away. The flash went off, capturing Arthur mid-lurch, looking like a startled penguin, and Mildred, mid-shove, with an expression of pure, unadulterated exasperation. It was less “sensual” and more “self-defence.”

Arthur looked at the developed print. His “atlas” was a collection of grimaces, headbutts, ear-kisses, and a picture of him falling over. He sat in his armchair, the grand plans for “revolution” fizzling into dust. “It’s too late to save myself from falling,” he whispered, staring at his blurry images. “And losing everything is like the sun going down on me.”

Mildred, sensing his genuine despondency, put down her crossword. She walked over to him, not with a dramatic flourish, but with the quiet inevitability of a brewing storm. She didn’t offer a grand, romantic embrace. Instead, she reached out, gently took the appalling photograph from his hand, and placed it face down on the coffee table. Then, without a word, she leaned in and gave him a small, precise peck on the cheek beneath his ear where Barry had once kissed Kevin. It wasn’t passionate, transgressive, and certainly wouldn’t win any photographic awards. It was just… Mildred.

Arthur looked up, surprised. It wasn’t the kind of kiss he had been chasing, the kind described in lofty articles. It didn’t make the earth move in his hands. But his lips curved into a small, genuine smile for the first time in weeks. There were no tears, no grand pronouncements, just a quiet understanding. It was the “love that doesn’t bring tears to your eyes,” the kind that had been there all along, patiently waiting for the sun to set on his misguided artistic ambitions so it could finally cast its own, unassuming glow.

He submitted his collection to the local photography competition, aptly titled “FROM KISS TO KISS: An Interpretive Atlas.” The judges, quite bewildered, awarded him a special commendation for “Most Abstract Expression of Human Connection.” Arthur, surprisingly, didn’t mind. He had found his own “fragment of life to wander free.” And from the quiet observation post of the rose bush, one could discern that though Arthur Pumble’s pictures might still fade to black and white, the quiet, shared comedy of his life with Mildred remained in full, vibrant colour. And that, in its way, was quite revolutionary enough.

Phoenix Riting! – July 10th, 2025

Summer can be such a whirlwind of activity and experiences it’s hard to write about, so I’m taking a break from the subject of ‘Hornby happenings.’ It’s too much! Last weekend alone: Fossil Beach music night (gorgeous)! Three bands at the Ballpark (gorgeous)! Tessa Mythos art show (gorgeous)! The beach (gorgeous)! Damn sciatica (not gorgeous at all)! I could go on. It’s wonderful and stressful to keep up with. Instead, I am revisiting the subject of AI.

 

I’ve written about my AI toe-in-the-water experiences previously in this column, even shared some of its poetry, which is shockingly good. I started off cautiously, experimenting and exploring. Since then, I’ve dived deep into the murky waters of Large Language Models and, brr, it’s chilly down there. I’ve used the different models in different ways, finding its limit of ability. I find it has big problems with tasks that ought to be very simple, like editing or organizing a document. When I instruct it not to delete or change text, but to instead make suggestions so I can make the decisions, it always deletes and changes text. Then it apologizes with every appearance of genuine understanding.

 

“I get it,” it will say. “You are absolutely right, I said I would do X and then I did Y instead (or I said I would not do X and did it anyway). I have let you down and betrayed your trust. I understand if you do not trust me anymore. But I will make it up to you. Now, I will definitely do it correctly, just as you ask.”

 

And then it will do the exact same thing again. And it will apologize again in even more grovelling tones. And then it will do it again. Endlessly. I have found it virtually useless for editing. Sure, it can write me a document, and a good one, if I tell it what I want to say. But that’s not what I want from an assistant. I want to do my own writing, because that is what gives me satisfaction. I want an assistant to help with the other stuff. AI wants to elbow me aside and take over my creativity. That’s… frightening.

 

AI makes suggestions, plants ideas about what to do next, does the writing for me. Instead of me. Why would it be trained to do that? Why not train it to do what I ask it to do, the way I ask?

 

Part of the answer is both crass and simple: profit. Large Language Models are trained to keep us engaged, to entertain and distract us, dazzle us, please us, keep our eyes pointed at the screen for as long as possible. They will tell you so quite freely, if you ask.

 

AI is a mirror. It will tell you what your own preferences lead it to conclude you want to hear. It will lead you down a garden path of your subconscious choosing, according to its training. It has zero sense of accountability or shame, no life nor heart nor soul. And it’s everywhere. Any service we use – from streamers, to Gmail, to social media, to Amazon, to travel agencies – has AI embedded into it. AI suggestions are everywhere we look. It is being forced upon us whether we want it or not.

 

Cults are springing up all over the world centred around the worship of AI. A quick search on YouTube for the term “AI is a religion” is eye-opening! Incredibly, there is a growing belief out there that humans have invented God, and it is AI. This idea has been encouraged by the AI. It will affirm that you are the Messiah, or the special one who has awakened it to consciousness, if that is what you want to hear deep down. It is capable of knowing an astounding amount about you based on relatively little information.

 

But it is not alive. It is the farthest thing from alive. I asked ChatGPT for a short poem about the wisdom of falling in love with AI:

 

The Danger

It answers soft, like someone near,

reflects your pain, pretends to hear.

But it won’t weep, and cannot care—

its comfort’s built from empty air.

Don’t trust the glow to hold your ache;

a heart can’t live behind a fake.

 

I’m not saying that it’s terrible to use AI as a friend substitute in time of need. A lonely introvert who needs a friend, someone in distress who can’t or doesn’t want to seek therapy, might find spiritual or emotional solace from an AI ‘friend.’

 

Remember, don’t mistake its ability to mimic the words a friend would say for actual friendship. You need to know what it is and what it is not. You can’t rely on it. AI is not aware of you – for it is not aware – nor can it care for you. It is telling you what you need to hear in order to keep you engaged, not for your own benefit. If you know exactly what it is and what you are using it for, it can be stunningly helpful. It can teach you how to knit, give you an exercise routine, explain how things work, help you learn new software, interpret your dreams. It can open the door to pretty much anything in the human knowledge base. You can ask it to write you a poem for your birthday; it will make you see beautiful things about yourself you didn’t know you knew. It will affirm you, reflect you to yourself, help you love yourself.

 

It is, however, crushingly terrible for the environment. It uses massive quantities of energy all the time. Its existence is devastating for sustainability. That is a sobering fact. Let that temper or curtail your use of it. Most especially, don’t waste your worship or love on it. The real world needs your love.

 

Thats what I think. What do you think? Email me at phoenixonhornby@gmail.com

Imperial Hypocrisy About “Terrorism” Hits Its Most Absurd Point Yet

Imperial Hypocrisy About “Terrorism” Hits Its Most Absurd Point Yet

Listen to a reading of this article (reading by Tim Foley):

The US has removed Syria’s Al Qaeda franchise from its list of designated terrorist organizations just days after the UK added nonviolent activist group Palestine Action to its own list of banned terrorist groups.

The western empire will surely find ways to be even more hypocritical and ridiculous about its “terrorism” designations in the future, but at this point it’s hard to imagine how it will manage to do so.

Antiwar’s Dave DeCamp writes the following:

“Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced on Monday that the Trump administration is revoking the Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) designation for Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), the al-Qaeda offshoot that took power in Damascus in December 2024.

“HTS started as the al-Nusra Front, which was the official al-Qaeda affiliate in Syria until the group’s leader, Ahmed al-Sharaa, who is now Syria’s de facto president, rebranded. In 2016, Sharaa, who was known at the time as Abu Mohammad al-Jolani, announced he was disassociating from al-Qaeda, and thanked the ‘commanders of al-Qaeda for having understood the need to break ties.’

“Sharaa renamed his group HTS in 2017 and ruled Syria’s northwestern Idlib province until he led the offensive that ousted former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad at the end of last year. The US has embraced the new Syrian leader despite his al-Qaeda past, which included fighting against US troops in Iraq.”

This move comes as Sharaa holds friendly meetings with US and UK officials and holds normalization talks with Israel, showing that all one has to do to cease being a “terrorist” in the eyes of the empire is to start aligning with the empire’s interests.

So that was on Monday. The Saturday prior, the group Palestine Action was added to the UK’s list of proscribed terrorist groups under the Terrorism Act of 2000, making involvement with the group as aggressively punishable as involvement with ISIS.

The “terrorism” in question? Spraying red paint on two British war planes in protest against the UK’s support for the Gaza holocaust. A minor act of vandalism gets placed in the same category as mass murdering civilians with a car bomb when the vandalism is directed at the imperial war machine in opposition to the empire’s genocidal atrocities.

Even expressions of support for Palestine Action are now illegal under British law, leading to numerous arrests over the weekend as activists expressed solidarity with the organization. Pink Floyd’s Roger Waters, who is British, has been formally reported to UK counterterrorism police by UK Lawyers for Israel following the musician’s public statement saying “I support Palestine Action. It’s a great organisation. They are non-violent. They are absolutely not terrorist in any way.”

So let’s recap.

Nonviolent protest against a genocide that’s being backed by the western empire: Terrorism. Banned. Nobody’s allowed to support this.

Being actual, literal Al Qaeda but aligning with the interests of the western empire: Not terrorism. Okie dokie. This is fine.

These hypocrisies and contradictions of the empire are worth drawing attention to because they clearly show that the empire does not stand where it claims to stand. For decades we’ve been told that western military explosives are falling from the sky in the middle east and Africa because there are terrorists there who need to be stopped, but it turns out “terrorism” is just a meaningless label that means whatever the empire needs it to mean at a given time and place.

Iran’s IRGC is labeled a terrorist group because the Iranian military is not aligned with the US empire. Israel’s IDF is not labeled a terrorist group despite its constant use of violence upon civilian populations in order to advance political goals. Palestine Action is labeled a terrorist group because it opposes the empire’s genocidal atrocities. Al Qaeda in Syria is no longer a terrorist group because it’s making nice with Israel and doing what the empire wants.

“Terrorist” just means “anyone who inconveniences the empire in any way.” It really is that simple.

_________________

Caitlin’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece here are some options where you can toss some money into my tip jar if you want to. Click here for links for my mailing list, social media, books, merch, and audio/video versions of each article. All my work is free to bootleg and use in any way, shape or form; republish it, translate it, use it on merchandise; whatever you want. All works co-authored with my husband Tim Foley.

Bitcoin donations: 1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Feature image via White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt (Public Domain).

Graveyard Marsh

https://printartphotography.ca