Home Blog Page 161

Green Wizardries: This Week in the Garden

Green Wizardries, This Week in the Garden by Maxine Rogers

I am writing this on 16 January 2022. Spring seems to have struck with a great deal of force. The ice and snow melted away, warm balmy winds caress the islands and I have the first winter aconite blooms in my garden. The blooms are small and not yet open but their brave yellow is out in the world. The winter aconite flower is the very first to bloom here. Mine were given to me by Jimmy Tait of blessed memory.

Jimmy was a veteran of WWII and even after that had an adventurous life. Jimmy was the unofficial Queen of Denman and ruled the island like a benevolent dictator. She gifted flowering plants far and wide and it is a rare garden on Denman that does not owe her a debt of gratitude.

The first spikes of garlic are up in the vegetable garden. The peach tree branches are thronged with swelling buds. With good luck and a following wind, we might be self-sufficient in peaches this year.

We have heaps of carrots, beets, leeks and celeriac still in the garden. This is my first time ever growing celeriac and we harvested our first one and ate it grated with a carrot as a salad with some home-made mayonnaise and dried tomatoes from last summer’s garden.

I want to stop and say a couple of words here about olive oil, for you cannot make a good mayonnaise without good olive oil. There is a lot of adulterated or counterfeit olive oil on the market. We bought a Greek olive oil at a popular store in Courtenay and for a while, I was able to make good mayonnaise from it. Then, suddenly, nothing I could do would turn the oil into mayonnaise. I had never had this trouble before.

I decide to check my oil and poured some of it into a small bowl and put it in the fridge for 24 hours. It was still liquid after all that time in the fridge. A real olive oil would have become thick like yogourt and a little opaque.

We called the store in question and were told to bring all the oil back and they would refund our money no problem. We took several cans of the oil back to them and they eagerly returned our money even though we did not have a receipt. They knew damned well it was counterfeit olive oil and just wanted us to go away.

They still carry the same brand of Greek fake-olive oil. The problem with this is if the oil is counterfeit, how do we know it is wholesome at all? So I would advise all my readers to get up now and put some of their olive oil in the fridge and check it again tomorrow.

Why would the Greeks choose to tarnish their good name by selling bad oil? I had this explained by a friend who had visited Greece and spoken to the farmers there. Greek farmers are not allowed by the EU to sell or even press their own olives but have to buy in sub-standard (rancid) olives from abroad and or cut the resulting oil with vegetables oils. The EU gives all the olive oil quotas to Spain and Italy because they are more important members of the EU.

I have had successes in last year’s garden but it is even more important to talk about the failures. I did not think we were going to get such an Arctic winter here and I left many Brussel’s sprouts plants standing in the garden. We had always been able to do that when we had a garden in Victoria. We used to have only four or five plants but they were all so tall and mighty that we left them in the field and harvested them all winter long. Turns out, you can’t do that here.

When the ice and snow melted, we went out into the garden and found the Brussels’s sprouts were much rotted. I was so disappointed as we love fresh Brussel’s sprouts. I have pulled most of the plants up and am feeding them to the hens who are not so fussy and feeding the best remaining sprouts to the rabbits who are.

This year, I hope to grow many more Brussel’s sprouts but this time, I will harvest them at the peak of readiness and blanch and freeze them. We did that with our huge cauliflower harvest last year and still have many bags of cauliflower to use in salads, soups and other recipes. Blanched cauliflower makes a wonderful salad with a lemon juice, olive oil, salt and chopped garlic dressing. Green beans likewise.

I know that if everyone is really well prepared for an extreme winter that we will have a mild one. I think this is a little, simple, natural magic that we would be well advised to pursue as a community.

When I was out in the garden, I noticed a huge host of those small, grey slugs fornicating in the heavy mulch. I also found a too high number of cutworms. I think we had all better start slug hunting early and often this year.

We have a single, ancient Muscovey duck who is too old to lay eggs anymore. She has been a good duck and given us many, many eggs and reared dozens of ducklings for us so we keep her as a pet. We caught her and clipped the flight feathers on one of her wings so she cannot fly away.

I carried her into the garden and orchard complex so she can hunt slugs and cut worms to her heart’s content. We catch her in the evening and put her back in the secure hen house so she can sleep safe from mink attack. I maintain that having a couple of hens or ducks in the garden is the most efficient way to deal with slugs and she turns those slugs into high-quality manure to fertilize the garden.

Just one more thing, my husband said to explain that we do have thin cables strung across the gardens to dissuade the eagles from hunting our garden poultry.

 

Thoughts about the 2022/23 budget

Thoughts about the 2022/23 budget

 

The cost of the Islands’ Trust is too high, its programs expanding out of control, its connections to the communities it’s supposed to serve increasingly hostile. 

 

Some thoughts about the budget could be scaled back:

 

Three-year moratorium on new hires.

 

Three-year moratorium on sponsorship applications other than Indigenous cultural ones.

 

Two-year moratorium on hiring of co-op students.

 

New projects for RPC/LTCs should be achievable in one fiscal year or deferred or dropped acknowledging that a new LTC/TC may have different priorities.

 

Planned work should be reduced to account for a ‘shortened’ year due to elections taking place in November 2022

 

Development application fees should cover a much larger share of the actual processing costs.

 

Development applications formerly processed through the Capital and Nanaimo Regional Districts (and maybe other RD’s) shouldn’t require pre-approval from the Islands’ Trust.

 

Cost-saving recommendations from the governance review should be implemented.

 

LTC projects should prioritize using staff, not consultants.

 

The Climate Indicators Project should be dropped as potential results re. global environmental impacts from one-half of one percent of BC’s population couldn’t justify the cost.  The IT should publicly acknowledge its limitations in addressing this global problem.

 

The Freshwater Sustainability Strategy should be scaled back to the scope of the freshwater policy of the most progressive of our 7 Regional Districts, rather than the IT positioning itself to be “the most progressive regional government in British Canada (typo?) and indeed the country.” (Econics Consulting, 2021).

 

Limit of $5,000 to be awarded to community environmental initiatives authorized by Bill 26.  These to be decided by community referendum.  If community groups need additional funding, they should seek it through environmental organizations grants.

 

 

No more than one Planner and one Regional Planning Manager and a recorded should ever be allowed to attend a regular LTC meeting, in-person or electronically.

 

Numbers of Planners on staff should parallel numbers of Planners on staff in other jurisdictions of similar population. 

 

Numbers of staff attending committee meetings should be limited.

 

More trustees are needed to promote democracy.  Islands with over 1000 residents should have three elected trustees, and islands with over 4000 residents should have five.  There would then be no need to have Executive Committee members serve as ties-breakers on at least 6 of the islands, and so EC members shouldn’t attend those meetings.  The elected LTC Chair could report to the EC.

 

Elected trustees should serve as communication specialists, and the full-time Communication Specialist position should be dropped.  At least three LTC meeting in each year should be replaced by a “Trust café” session, on a weekend or evening.  These should serve coffee and cookies (or whatever), play music, other friendly things, and the trustees should explain in plain language what’s happening in the IT, including controversial issues and costs of programs.  Trustees should include explanation of the governance structure of the IT, its jurisdiction, and what projects/problems are ongoing on other islands and how their LTC’s are coping with them.

 

Mapping initiatives should reflect need, not technological capability.  If maps duplicate those made by other jurisdictions, the IT shouldn’t make them.  If they haven’t been used for meaningful on-the-ground work in a year, they shouldn’t be updated until a need arises.

 

No public money should be spent on advocacy letter-writing to higher jurisdictions.

 

No staff time should be spent on paperwork exercises re. affordable housing that don’t directly generate new affordable housing.

 

The words “unique amenities” should be dropped from all IT language, too be replaced by “environmental, social, and economic amenities.”

 

Sincerely,

Margie Gang

 

Islands Trust (IT) Budget and timing of Public Feedback survey

Author: Mairead Boland, Saturna Island

Date: January 19th 2022

Subject: Islands Trust (IT) Budget and timing of Public Feedback survey.

In November 2021 I became aware of the poor timing of the Islands Trust public feedback survey on the budget. The survey is launched in late January, takes place over 10 days, survey results are provided to the Financial Planning Committee (FPC) in mid February and the budget is adopted by Trust Council approximately 10 working days later.

How can this survey have any impact on the adopted budget I asked myself?

After my delegation in Dec 2021 to the Trust Council, when my request that IT use last year’s results was disregarded, I decided to conduct a Citizen Survey based on the central question asked in each of the IT past surveys.

In January 2022, I launched the Citizen Survey with the question which is central to each of the previous IT surveys (2019, 2020, 2021).

“What Budget Principle do you support?”

The results were provided to the Islands Trust FPC for the January 19th meeting.

As of today, 524 people responded from across the islands, of whom 316 commented.

42% of islanders want the budget, expenditures, taxes, to be reduced through the reduction of services and programs.

90% want no increase – this is the sum of those who want a reduction and those who want the budget to remain the same.

9% voted for increased expenditure and activities.

The trends though the IT surveys (2019, 2020, 2021) and now this survey, are significant – none more so than this; 38% wanted an increase in 2019, by Jan 2021 it was 20%, and now in Jan 2022 it is 9%

In summary, the survey is conducted too late in the budget planning cycle to be effective, the survey key questions are poorly worded and little effort is spent analysing the results.

In my opinion the public feedback survey results are not being used to develop or adjust the budget.

At the FPC meeting (Jan 19th) it was agreed in principle to conduct the survey earlier. There was an extensive discussion on the facts and figures to be represented in the survey. There is tension between providing a lot of information and a belief that people will be impatient with an extensive survey – especially if they are using a small mobile device.

I personally believe that the Islands Trust could create an ad-hoc community working group to collaborate on budget creation – those people could become ambassadors to explain the budget to others. This would be true community engagement and consultation.

 

To Take the SURVEY:

https://forms.gle/XKCPGpAr9aNHkX458

To View the RESULTS (Live)

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1K4188gcjXtRIGyRvibihGGYQ5rABWiNjpW7T5UR2PAA/viewanalytics

To take part in the survey scan this QR code or email info4allourvoices@gmail.com for a link

 

An Unpainted Portrait, Who Me?

Who, me?

As we stood panting gently in the growing heat of the morning, we were informed of a new and exciting feature of the annual parade display. For this marvelous spectacle, only twenty-four of us would be chosen. With a little more organization based upon height, we had four teams of young men standing together and looking a little bewildered. Bottomley then cheerfully introduced each team to one of the coloured logs. Each was approximately sixteen feet long (I would be more precise, but I never seem to have a tape measure with me at such times) and painted in chequered patterns; one blue and white, one red and white, one yellow and one green. I presumed it was so that a) we didn’t lose them, or b) we didn’t accidentally wander off and use another team’s pole by mistake.

We carried the poles on shoulders – hence the height requirement – onto the very front of the parade square, at which point the remainder of our intake, until then kicking their exquisitely white heels and becoming increasingly bored, began to watch with interest – and with good reason. We lined up and then, after some instruction and very nervously, we began to throw and catch these two hundred and-something pound lumps of splintery wood. Straight up and down, over our heads – throwing it up on one side and spinning underneath it to catch it on the other side. We even dallied with testicular splinters and slid the bloody thing between our legs (yes really). Hopefully, you get the idea, because re-living this once is enough for me. It wasn’t the first time that I’d cursed evolution for giving me external gonads, and neither would it be the last.

It was all a bit dangerous and very silly but since Mr Bottomley was behind it, we complied without a word of complaint. The theory, as I understood it, was that we were providing a very important person (Sir Lionel) with a dazzling display of disciplined teamwork, something that was sure to amaze and delight both the great man and the attendant audience. They, incidentally, would be there in order to support their relative graduate and not watch a gang of badly dressed idiots fooling around with large painted logs. Instead of creating a marvellous spectacle, it felt like a rather pathetic and half-hearted exercise that belonged to the same era as our PT kit. On the plus side, I suppose I learned that multi-inch splinters can be every bit as painful as they look.

Once we’d finished throwing, juggling and shuffling our logs, we were lined up for a little competition: a thrilling race. This silliest of all silly ideas involved us shuffling the poles between our legs, over our heads and doing some other just-as-daft throwing stuff with them, before raising each pole vertically and having the most monkey-like member of each team shinny up to the very top of it, there to claim a glorious victory. Dennis, a remarkably hairy and wiry guy from my own class was, fittingly, chosen to be our team’s ‘monkey’. He had been a merchant seaman and was no doubt well practised at making his way up masts and yardarms etc. It didn’t really matter – just so long as it wasn’t me trying it. It was all very 1930s, very silly, and worst of all, it meant that when the exercise finished, I ended up looking directly up the voluminous shorts of one of the hairiest men I’d ever met. It wasn’t what I’d envisaged doing with this part of my life.

In deference to the well-established fact that modern politicians are quite happy to send people off to war/into harm’s way, yet detest the icky sight of blood, we were ordered not to injure ourselves lest we disturb Sir Lionel’s carefully established and in-no-way-cognac-infused equilibrium. Therefore, we had to be good at this…thing, whatever it was supposed to be. In other words, repetitive practice loomed large in our futures. Great, just great. Subsequent rehearsals for this display of dubious wisdom were inevitably fraught with injury; ranging from pretty darned impressive (six inches long) splinters to significant bruises, minor crush injuries abrasions, strains and sprains. I was fortunate to avoid any significant injury because my head usually got in the way first.

To me, this kind of upper-class ‘let’s entertain the great unwashed masses to prevent a revolution’ dickery was an anachronism. I very much doubted that any audience – apart, of course, from the Home Secretary, who would be privy to the arcane reasoning for such things – would be anything other than a little puzzled as to why trainee policemen were throwing telegraph poles around and shuffling them between their legs. I mean – have you ever seen your local constables demonstrate this skill? No, you haven’t, and for very good reason; that would be because only a very few were so carefully and specifically selected and trained to do so! It was probably comforting for the onlookers to consider that, should a power/telephone pole emergency break out in the high street, the brave expertise of the pole-shuffling squad was close at hand. Perhaps.

For the next month, we practised several times each week. Thankfully the summer weather that year was spectacular, and the sun always seemed to be shining as we went through the increasingly dull routine. The format was that we would troop onto the empty parade square in a single file with me at the back. Everyone would jog in step – harder than it sounds when we were all strung out in a very long line – to their allotted position. I was the last to come to a stop on that (freshly re-painted) dot directly in front of where Sir Lionel Nutbar would ultimately be seated in all his glorious, toffee-nosed political boredom.

After a short introduction speech which was comically ad-libbed by Mr Bottomley on each occasion, we were started with a single whistle peep, upon which we jumped from attention to a ‘stand-at-ease’ position. From that point, with the music blaring scratchily from a huge forty-year-old speaker cone – it looked suspiciously like the foghorn from an old battleship – on top of the adjacent building, it was all up to me to take everyone through the routine on tempo. They moved when I moved. I was counting to a rhythm, but it looked like I was making them all move; if only I had been, I could have had some fun, albeit at the expense of a career. If I screwed up, however, I would be taking everyone else – including Bottomley – with me. Memories of my marching ‘expertise’ occasionally reared their ugly heads and for a split second all control of my limbs would leave me but, fortunately, the routine was easy to remember and easy to perform. It almost became fun. As my confidence grew and my trepidation about being the focus for so many pairs of eyes receded, the universe rubbed its hands with glee and hatched its evil plan for me.

 

Lost Comrades

Lost Comrades

By Eartha Muirhead

Since August 2021, two Fairy Creek defenders have tragically vanished into thin air.

Gerald (Smiley) Kearney walked off the mountain, in late August, after about 10 days. He spoke to someone at the Roadside camp, who reportedly said he was tired and was heading home to Victoria. He did not have a vehicle, so we assume he hitchhiked. No body has been found.

Kevin (Bear) Henry, was last heard from on November 27. He was sleeping in his van in Lake Cowichan, on his way to the blockade. He texted family members that night, saying someone was trying to break into his van. His van has not been found and neither has his body. I am trying not to spend time speculating, so here are the facts.

https://www.vicnews.com/news/friends-and-family-begin-fundraiser-for-missing-kevin-bear-henry-last-seen-near-fairy-creek.

Bear Henry has been missing for more than a month, and friends are worried. A few of them started a fundraiser via Go Fund Me—to fund search efforts.

Henry was reported as missing on Dec. 11, and since Dec. 15 friends with winter-ready cars have been searching the area around Lake Cowichan’s south shore. The RCMP have conducted two helicopter fly-overs.

On Jan. 2, fundraiser organizer Tareen Sangha wrote that they had hired a helicopter to conduct an aerial search of the Lake Cowichan cliffs. “No leads yet but we will continue to search and hope to bring our friend home,” Sangha wrote. Sangha met Henry in university several years ago, and the two were roommates on and off. “We became family,” he said. Henry is a Victoria-based outreach worker who had been involved with the blockades at Fairy Creek, and before that was part of a group at Beacon Hill Park advocating for people experiencing homelessness. His aunt, Rose Henry, is a prominent Fairy Creek activist. To learn more about Bear Henry, go to The Capital Daily website, April 3, 2021, an interview with Nina Grossman.

The search organizers are waiting for a bill from the helicopter company to know how much money is left to continue the search. In the meantime, they’re reviewing map data to find areas that haven’t been searched by helicopter and boat. Sangha said they’re looking for people with snowmobiles and boats already on Lake Cowichan to help. If you can help, the name of the fund-raiser is “Bring Bear Home”.

Last week, after a series of requests, the RCMP finally authorized a search party of friends to go inside the injunction zone. However, when the search party tried to gain access, Teal-Jones’ employees, the outfit given the Tree Farm License to illegally log that area, refused them entry. This causes many to speculate that Teal-Jones has something to hide. Maybe they are just afraid that a few exhausted and grief-stricken folks might try to steal one of the world’s last remaining three thousand year old Yellow Cedar Trees. Or, maybe Teal-Jones’ seven private detectives, who have been spying on the blockades since early summer, were off duty that day.

 

Memoir of a Rural Sisyphus-Redux

Memoir of a Rural Sisyphus-Redux

Introduction

Memoir of a Rural Sisyphus-Redux

Bill Engleson

www.engleson.ca

For a few years, I kept a diary of my inauguration into the Denman Community. This column, recently renamed Memoir of a Rural Sisyphus-Redux, will

extract several of my observations from a dozen or so years ago and share them. Hopefully, they will have some modern times currency.

Strikes

October 11, 2005

I have always supported a workers right to strike. My first strike was a pulp workers cessation of labour in 1957. I was ten. It was winter and I went on the picket line with my old man. I remember fires burning to keep everyone warm. I remember swigging my first cup of coffee. Harmac, the mill being struck, was miles out of town. We had to drive down the Island highway, snow banking deep on both sides, and then take the Cedar turnoff. A few miles along, we drove over the old bridge that hung high above the Nanaimo River.

The strike camp was pretty close to the mill but was nothing more then canvas tents and burn barrels.

As vague as the memory of that single occurrence is, I have repeated the tale numerous times over the years. Any time I found myself on my own picket line, and that was six or seven times including one of the summers I worked at Harmac as a student earning the coming years tuition-a time when that was possible- I have invariably boasted about my introduction to a union picket line.

The papers these days are full of under-stimulated journalists decrying the current teachers strike. “It’s anarchy,” they rail. “It flaunts the rule of law,” they add.

The courts have struck at the pocketbooks of the teachers, freezing their strike pay. Think coal miners for a moment. Think Dickensian child factory workers. Assuming they had strike pay, had progressive unions, what would be our view if the courts froze their union wages to coerce them back into the coal pits, the poisoned air of slave labour factories?

I admit strikes grind things to a halt. Often they have no immediate benefit. At the end of the day though, people have the right to withhold their labour. Their labour is them. There often is little differentiation between the two.

More to the point, however, is that strikes are often mostly about the future, hopefully ensuring improved conditions for the ones that follow.

While strikes beget sacrifice, they usually beget change.

Therein rests their principal value.

 

Margaret Magson

On Monday 17 January 2022, Margaret Magson passed away at age 90 in Cumberland Lodge, Cumberland, BC. Marg was born on 3 March 1931 in East Stratton, England to Horace and Lily Knight.

Marg met her life-long partner Reg just after World War II and they made the best of the post war life spending many hours riding around England on a motorcycle. They married in 1954 and together they emigrated to Kitimat, BC in 1956. Reg went to work for Alcan and Marg went to work for the Royal Bank. Margaret was a wonderful cook producing meals from wild meats and fish and from multiple cultures. She ignited the love of cooking and enjoying good food in their son Ken.

Reg and Margaret made a massive life change in 1970 when they moved to Denman Island and became the joint owners of the Denman General Store. They sold the store in 1974 and moved to a new location on Denman Island. This idyllic spot provided a large garden, homes for beef cows, chickens, etc. She supported Reg in his job as the Denman Island school bus driver, Fire Chief and local small engine mechanic. She figured out schedules, fielded many calls from parents and customers, all between harvesting produce and helping maintain the garden. They lived there until Reg passed away in September 2020.

Marg had a wonderful memory and took great interest in everyone’s family remaining sharp until the end, remembering and always asking everyone about each member of their family. Margaret missed her husband greatly and due to her mobility issues moved on to assisted living and finally settling into Cumberland Lodge.

Survived by her son Ken, daughter in law Patricia, granddaughter Eilisha, and several other grandchildren and great grandchildren.

 

Press Release, Concerned Island Residents Association

Concerned Island Residents Association

November 3, 2021  · 

Concerned Islands Residents Association

NEWS RELEASE November 3, 2021

Gulf Islands residents not consulted about new B.C. Municipal Act amending Islands Trust Act and regional government legislation or impact, says new community group; asks B.C. government to hold off passing legislation

CIRA opposed to removing public hearings, consultation before rezoning; financial issues

GULF ISLANDS – A new Gulf Islands community group says that B.C. Municipal Act and the Islands Trust Act legislation introduced last week was not the result of consultation with island residents.

The Concerned Island Residents Association says the B.C. government legislation amending the Islands Trust Act was apparently requested by the Islands Trust but adequate consultation on the amendments or their impact has not taken place.

And CIRA says that Municipal Affairs Statutes Amendments Act (No. 2) changes that would remove the necessity for public hearings on rezoning changes for both municipalities and regional governments will apply to the Islands Trust and again undermines the democratic principles of holding elected representatives accountable and responsible for rezoning applications that impact residents.

“Some of these amendments would reduce the accountability and transparency of Islands Trust officials and others would have an unknown impact, so we are asking the provincial government to hold off on passing these amendments until communities on the Gulf Islands have an opportunity to hear from their elected representatives and understand the consequences,” said CIRA spokesperson Bill Tieleman.

CIRA is also concerned about giving the Islands Trust the ability to: “give financial support to community groups for activities that provide education about or preserve the environment and unique amenities of the Trust Area.”

“Islands residents are already facing substantial tax increases to pay for ever-expanding Islands Trust expenditures – what controls will there be on even more free spending by staff and Trust representatives?” Tieleman asked. “Who decides how to spend island taxpayers’ money and how much?”

CIRA was formed to voice the concerns of Gulf Islanders over proposed substantial revisions to the Islands Trust Policy that have not been properly discussed or debated and amount to fundamental and negative changes.

For more information: Bill Tieleman, West Star Communications, email: weststar@telus.net

 

Castaway Earth

Letter to the Editor

I’m a regular subscriber to the online Grapevine and appreciate receiving my emailed version every week. I also appreciate that you feature Gwynne Dyer’s pieces and open up some space for issues beyond those immediately affecting island residents. 

I was quite struck by his column published yesterday (Jan.6th, 2022) in which he very inaccurately and misleadingly (in my view) promoted nuclear power as a remedy for our climate emergency. I have been interested in this issue for many years particularly because of its huge potential threats to human health and safety.

Just today the article below came my way and represents a detailed and very comprehensive outline of the shortcomings and very real dangers of nuclear technology Written by experts with decades of international expertise in that field. It is written in a very accessible non-technical style, and I think would add a very balanced and articulate opinion to counter the arguments presented by Dyer. 

Charles King (MD)

International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War Canada

1691 Lacon Rd. 

Subject: Four nuclear experts: “Nuclear is just not part of any feasible strategy that could counter climate change.”

This authenticity of this communiqué has been verified; see  www.nuclearconsult.com .

For pdf version : www.ccnr.org/nuclear_climate_change_2022.pdf

_________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________

Communiqué – Statement – January 6, 2022

 

Former heads of US, German, and French nuclear regulation and

Secretary to UK government’s radiation protection committee:

 

“Nuclear is just not part of any feasible strategy

that could counter climate change.”

 

 —————————————– 

Dr. Gregory Jaczko,

former Chairman of the

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

 —————————————– 

Prof. Wolfgang Renneberg,

former Head of

Reactor Safety, Radiation Protection and Nuclear Waste,

Federal Environment Ministry, Germany.

 —————————————–

Dr. Bernard Laponche,

former Director General,

French Agency for Energy Management,

former Advisor to French Minister of Environment, Energy and Nuclear Safety.

 —————————————– 

Dr. Paul Dorfman,

former Secretary of the UK Government

Committee Examining Radiation Risk from Internal Emitters.(CERRIE)

 —————————————– 

The climate is running hot. Evolving knowledge of climate sensitivity and polar ice melt-rate makes clear that sea-level rise is ramping, along with destructive storm, storm surge, severe precipitation and flooding, not forgetting wildfire. With mounting concern and recognition over the speed and pace of the low carbon energy transition that’s needed, nuclear has been reframed as a partial response to the threat of global heating. But at the heart of this are questions about whether nuclear could help with the climate crisis, whether nuclear is economically viable, what are the consequences of nuclear accidents, what to do with the waste, and whether there’s a place for nuclear within the swiftly expanding renewable energy evolution.

As key experts who have worked on the front-line of the nuclear issue, we’ve all involved at the highest governmental nuclear regulatory and radiation protection levels in the US, Germany, France and UK. In this context, we consider it our collective responsibility to comment on the main issue: Whether nuclear could play a significant role as a strategy against climate change.

 

The central message, repeated again and again, that a new generation of nuclear will be clean, safe, smart and cheap, is fiction. The reality is nuclear is neither clean, safe or smart; but a very complex technology with the potential to cause significant harm. Nuclear isn’t cheap, but extremely costly. Perhaps most importantly nuclear is just not part of any feasible strategy that could counter climate change. To make a relevant contribution to global power generation, up to more than ten thousand new reactors would be required, depending on reactor design.

 

In short, nuclear as strategy against climate change is:

 

• Too costly in absolute terms to make a relevant contribution to global power production

 

• More expensive than renewable energy in terms of energy production and CO2 mitigation, even taking into account costs of grid management tools like energy storage associated with renewables roll-out.

 

• Too costly and risky for financial market investment, and therefore dependent on very large public subsidies and loan guarantees.

 

• Unsustainable due to the unresolved problem of very long-lived radioactive waste.

 

• Financially unsustainable as no economic institution is prepared to insure against the full potential cost, environmental and human impacts of accidental radiation release – with the majority of those very significant costs being borne by the public.

 

• Militarily hazardous since newly promoted reactor designs increase the risk of nuclear weapons proliferation.

• Inherently risky due to unavoidable cascading accidents from human error, internal faults, and external impacts; vulnerability to climate-driven sea-level rise, storm, storm surge, inundation and flooding hazard, resulting in international economic impacts.

 

• Subject to too many unresolved technical and safety problems associated with newer unproven concepts, including ‘Advanced’ and Small Modular Reactors (SMRs).

 

• Too unwieldy and complex to create an efficient industrial regime for reactor construction and operation processes within the intended build-time and scope needed for climate change mitigation.

 

• Unlikely to make a relevant contribution to necessary climate change mitigation needed by the 2030’s due to nuclear’s impracticably lengthy development and construction time-lines, and the overwhelming construction costs of the very great volume of reactors that would be needed to make a difference.

06.01.2022. 

Posted by the Nuclear Consulting Group, www.nuclearconsult.com .